Log has written
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009

Can the Indian democracy claim this century for its own? That seems to me a tall order, even if after factoring in all the positives that have accrued to both the economy, and consequently, society. In part because there’s one vital facet of this democracy that has not yet been truly freed of its chronic mindset of protectionism. This facet is that of governance, which is increasingly being acknowledged as the key to broadbased development. And for governance to be truly democratic, and facilitate equal opportunity for all, an informed citizenry is a must.

It is one and a half years since the Central Right to Information (RTI) Act was passed. There were huge expectations that this law would bring in much-needed transformation in governance. And rightly so. The experience with the RTI Acts in many states earlier had been quite encouraging.

However, the experiences with the central RTI Act have been mixed. A trend can be seen —when you file an RTI application, either you get information in the very first instance; if you do not and if you file an appeal, there is very little chance that you will get information. The appellate process, notably the information commissioners, barring a few exceptions, is perceived to be functioning against citizens rather than protecting their interests.

There is one area where the RTI Act has so far been used with great precision—if any legitimate work was pending in any government department and government officials were not doing it, either because they expected a bribe or simple bureaucratic lethargy. The RTI Act has proved very effective in such situations. Whether it is a pending passport or an income tax refund or an old age pension or a caste certificate or any other work—earlier people used to feel completely helpless in their day-to-day dealings with government. RTI has given ordinary people the power to be able to challenge bribery. There are thousands of people across the country who used RTI and said no to bribes.

How does it work? When you ask questions such as—give me the names of the officials who were responsible for doing my work and who have not done it, why has my work not been done so far, when will my work be done now—it becomes difficult for government departments to reply to your queries. Because the responsibility gets fixed. In most cases, before they provide information, they end up doing your job.

Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
anuj Said:


Ya i truly agree with Mr Arvind,And i beleive total empowerment with information seems to be distant dream because beaurocracy always protects beaurocracy.

Posted On 7/6/2007 6:49:09 AM
GS Said:


Most bureaucrats will definitely do all they can to throttle RTI - because they believe RTI diminishes the power they have over our societal systems. (They are entirely correct in this belief if they view themselves as "masters of our societal systems" - and servants of the politicians. On the other other hand, if they properly understand that their proper role is to serve society and all citizens, then the RTI would truly empower them. It's all a matter of perspective). I understand that Shailesh Gandhi has been recently appointed as a Commissioner at the Central Information Commission - and that he has pledged a pendency of not more than 3 months for any RTI petition. I wish him luck - but it is surely going to be a very tough job! The bureaucrats and the politicians are all out there in force trying to throttle the RTI!! (Aside to Mint: I'd like to bring to your kind attention some useful tools that can help enable citizens significantly enhance the power of the RTI Act and its practical implementation from day to day. Specifically, to whom should I send the documentation about these useful tools?)

Posted On 9/20/2008 8:23:17 AM