Logwritten
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2009 12:43 PM IST

The Union government has started clearing the way for foreign law firms to practice in India even as it is in the middle of consulting India’s legal fraternity about their their concerns over impending foreign competition.

Union law minister H.R. Bhardwaj said on Tuesday that the government had started negotiations with Indian lawyers to prepare the ground for the entry of foreign law firms in India. “We’re negotiating this issue,” said Bhardwaj on the sidelines of a seminar on international tax.

The ministry plans to wrap up consultations with domestic law firms by December, but Bhardwaj declined to put a timetable to any liberalization, saying that “these things aren’t decided in time frames.”

At stake is a booming sector that is very tightly controlled by Indian firms and lawyers that operates under significant government regulations, some dating back to the British rule.

India’s robust economic growth and a growing influx of foreign firms has created a growing appetite among prospective clients and major non-Indian law firms to want to open the sector for foreign firms.

Even if there is a consensus and political will to open the influential sector, it could be a drawn out process.

If liberalization is allowed in the sector, it will require amendments to the Advocates Act and the Limited Liability Partnership Act, along with the evolution of a regulatory mechanism to ensure there’s a level playing field for the foreign firms stepping in.

The government met with representatives of leading law firms including members of the Society of Indian Law Firms (Silf) on 17 September to hear their views. It has asked them to suggest “safeguards” to cushion Indian firms from overseas competition once the sector is opened up, said Bhardwaj. However, the Indian legal fraternity says it is concerned that the government has already begun an exercise to alter definitions in the law, which are needed to allow foreign lawyers to practice here.

“A note circulated by the ministry at the meeting last week suggested we fall in line with the proposed liberalization of legal services,” maintained Silf president Lalit Bhasin. Bhasin is also a partner at the law firm Bhasin and Co.

The law ministry has, however, assured the lawyers that it was open to a dialogue and has asked the society to submit its comments by 31 October. The society is also slated to meet with ministry officials on 3 October.

“But, three days ago, the ministry of law filed an affidavit in the Bombay high court pleading that practice of law in India should be interpreted as the practice of Indian law alone,” Bhasin points out. “This would bring the foreign lawyers who practice international law in India outside the purview of the Indian Advocates Act.”

The affidavit was filed in a case where Lawyers Collective, a legal service provider in matters of public interest challenged few foreign firms that were holding licences with the Reserve Bank of India that granted them permission to have liason offices in India.

The Indian Advocates Act regulates the legal practice in India.

Sanjiv Shankaran contributed to this story.

Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Indian Said:


The Indian lawyers who seem to be opposing this can be classified within two groups: (i) litigating advocates, who are ill informed and somehow believe (or made to believe) that the foreign lawyers are interested in their territory; and (ii) a small group of Indian corporate law firm owners who are raking in the moolah and fear that their monopoly (and huge take homes) would be severly impacted. some of these have enough political clout to ensure that if the market opens, it would be on their terms. Not many realise that once the Indian market opens to foreign legal expertise, this would usher in a revolution similar to the IT revolution ushered in a couple of years back. Its time that monopolistic Indian corporate lawyers let go of their greed and let the reforms happen. Why are they scared?

Posted On 9/26/2007 5:43:53 AM
Re: subramanian Said:


There should be reciprocal arrangement. Indian lawyers and firms should be allowed to practice in other countries by their Governments without restrictions on reciprocal terms. Then only India should allow foreign law firms to enter India.

Posted On 10/15/2007 2:19:13 PM
Re: Indian Said:


Couldnt agree more. To be more precise- its the elderly sitting on the bar council, worried about THEIR children and grandsons. Its only incredible to note that it hasnt happened as yet in a booming economy as India. The results of china and Japan opening their legal markets are for all to see. We are already late in the race and theres so much to catch up on. Hope sanity prevails and we let them in- sooner the better!

Posted On 3/26/2008 6:27:05 PM
Kaviraj Said:


we welcome the government's move to allow the foreign law firm in India. delhilaw.firm.in & trustman.org

Posted On 7/2/2008 1:25:12 PM
krishnakumar Said:


The current state of practise in india is only favourable to people who have some sort of lineage in the profession, sadly only they seem to have a say in the matter, and they are gladly protecting their rear ends and of their children.

Posted On 7/7/2009 6:27:38 PM