Log has written
SATURDAY, AUGUST 09, 2008 12:40 AM IST
In 2002, after middle-distance runner Sunita Rani tested positive for steroid use at the Asian Games in South Korea, administrators of Indian athletics turned to SRL Ranbaxy Ltd for a second opinion.
The medical diagnostic company cleared the medalist’s name—and in the process, the idea for a new business was planted: Why not localize and commercialize athletic drug testing in India?
Preparing ground: SRL Ranbaxy chief executive Sanjiv K. Chaudhry.
Preparing ground: SRL Ranbaxy chief executive Sanjiv K. Chaudhry.
Because India does not have a single facility with the globally recognized World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada) certification, Ranbaxy is expanding its laboratories and testing capability with hopes of gaining it. Local sports authorities currently send athletes’ urine samples to certified centres abroad for a dope check.
But SRL Ranbaxy is not alone. The state-run Sports Authority of India (SAI), which develops both sporting talent and infrastructure, is setting up a laboratory at New Delhi’s Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium. Wada’s certification is expected by June, says Indian Olympic Association (IOA) secretary general Randhir Singh.
This is a month after Wada officials at a meeting in Iceland urged India to implement a proper drug-testing programme. “The next cricket World Cup will be hosted by India along with other countries in the subcontinent in 2011 and it will be in the fitness of things if specialized testing is available by then,” Wada director general David Howman said at the meeting, according to Indo-Asian News Service. Wada did not return an email to its Canada headquarters for comment.
For both certification and to drum up business, SRL Ranbaxy—a joint venture of Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd and Speciality Laboratories Inc.—has begun a Rs2 crore upgrade of its Gurgaon laboratory, among the 40 it has nationwide. Already, SRL Ranbaxy, based in Mumbai, has been signed up by the promoters of the Indian Cricket League (ICL) to check players for doping. It also sees an opportunity in the 2010 Commonwealth Games in New Delhi, and wants to obtain the Wada certification before the Youth Commonwealth Games in Pune next year. “We are in the pre-application plane,” says chief executive Sanjiv K. Chaudhry. “We have got the Wada requirements and will hopefully meet the standards.”
The goal, he says, is to create a permanent, commercial service marketed to sports federations, organizers of sporting events and athletes.
Dope testing is an event-related business, and never the mainstay for Wada-certified labs. It’s impossible to sustain as a single business for events only held every one or two years, says Chaudhry.
Each sample test costs $200 (Rs7,800); logistics such as collection and transport cost more. Worldwide, dope testing is a $1 billion market annually, Chaudhry estimates.
As steroid use becomes harder to detect, drug testing in the country will need to become more sophisticated, says Dr Bharat Inder Singh, the India representative on the Wada board and the sports medicine specialist at Ranbaxy-promoted Fortis Health Care Ltd.
For example, he says, SAI’s technology can identify steroids but cannot pinpoint their source, meaning if they are naturally produced within the body or ingested.
Generally, test samples during athletic meets in India are sent to the SAI facility. If drugs are detected, the samples are sent to Bangkok. Events such as cricket matches don’t have such tests, though the Board of Control for Cricket in India doesn’t rule it out in future.
“We are concerned about this, we know what to do but we won’t go to a private agency,” says the board’s chief administrative officer Ratnakar Shetty.
Hockey federation secretary general K. Jothi Kumaran says his organization would consider SRL Ranbaxy’s services when the Premier Hockey League, which started on Thursday, is conducted next year. The federation usually goes through SAI, he says.
IOA president Suresh Kalmadi, Chaudhry says, has been “very receptive” to SRL Ranbaxy’s plans, but IOA’s Singh said he was not familiar with SRL Ranbaxy’s bid.
Chaudhry’s optimism stems mainly from the company’s one-time successful role in anti-doping tests. After Rani, a winner of a gold in 1,500m and a bronze in 5,000m at the 2002 Asian Games, had to surrender her medals, the Amateur Athletics Federation of India approached SRL Ranbaxy on her behalf. Following the new report, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) sent both results to another Wada-certified facility in the US, which confirmed SRL Ranbaxy’s findings. The athlete had indeed not used drugs.
Then days before ICL began inaugural matches on 30 November in Panchkula, media baron Subhash Chandra’s Essel Group, promoters of the league, contacted SRL Ranbaxy to set up the requisite facilities. SRL Ranbaxy had little time to implement a process, but sent representatives to observe and coordinate logistics. It promises its Gurgaon lab will be ready for the next tournament in March.
Find More Articles By:
 
K Said:


1. There is no such thing as a second opinion in dope-testing. If there was, every other case of doping will go for second opinion around the globe. If you test positive you can seek ‘B’ sample test. WADA rules require the ‘B’sample to be tested by a different set of scientists in the same laboratory. 2. The only time samples were sent abroad was at the last National Games. Otherwise tests are done in the SAI laboratory. For international meets testing is compulsorily in accredited labs. 3. SAI lab has been there for the past 17 years; it is not being set up now. 4.Drug testing around the world is not dependent on an accredited laboratory or whether that laboratory can test more sophisticated drugs. In any case, all WADA-accredited laboratories are expected to have facilities to test all drugs that are in the prohibited list. There is no WADA Board Member from India. Mr. Randhir Singh, IOA Secretary-General, used to be one. Dr. Bharat Inder Singh never has been one. 5. Steroids that are found in the body have to be within a particular threshold and over that it will become “positive” case. What Dr Singh wanted to say perhaps was that SAI Lab does not have the Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer, used to determine whether the substance was naturally produced or else ingested. The SAI Lab does have the IRMS machine. 6. There has never been a re-test done in a foreign lab, except in the case of weightlifter Anita Kumari in a recent court case. IOA and federations have imposed sanctions on the results obtained in SAI lab. 7. Sunita Rani was tested in the IOC-accredited laboratory in Seoul. Following discrepancies pointed out by the AFI and IOA, the IOC and the IAAF decided not to pursue the case and she was reprieved. The problem mainly pertained to “documentation”. At no stage did any authority say that her sample returned a ‘negative’ result. There is no provision to take out a sample from an accredited laboratory and test it in a private lab (not then, not now).

Posted On 12/21/2007 3:29:21 PM