Log has written
THURSDAY, AUGUST 28, 2008 4:41 PM IST
India has the second largest number of lawyers after only the US. There has been mounting pressure on the Indian government from other governments, particularly of the UK, for opening up professional services in India, including legal services.
Illustration: Jayachandran / Mint
Illustration: Jayachandran / Mint
Legal services in India have experienced a steady and continuous growth in the past decades as a consequence of the growth in international trade and the emergence of new fields of practice, particularly in the area of business law. Issues such as corporate restructuring, privatization, cross-border mergers and acquisitions, intellectual property rights, new financial instruments and competition law are generating an increasing demand for more sophisticated legal services, which are now readily available here. It is absurd to suggest that our legal profession does not have the expertise or experience to handle complex international transactions. Indian law firms have the requisite skill and technology to deal with high-profile work of any nature.
The legal profession in India is seeing a paradigm shift in its focus, style and orientation. This can be attributed to factors ranging from the changing face of legal education to new opportunities for lawyers and emerging law firms, and to technology and globalization. Law as a profession is no longer synonymous only with litigation. Specialization is the new mantra, and firms and lawyers are seen aligning themselves to specialized practice groups.
This is essentially a demand from law firms in the UK as they are witnessing negative growth
Indian lawyers have played a crucial role in helping formulate policy to enhance foreign investment and to create a favourable environment for foreign investors. Despite limiting circumstances, law firms, particularly over the last few years, have shown youthful dynamism by reinventing themselves to provide cutting-edge legal advice. Leading firms in different jurisdictions have worked with Indian lawyers/law firms, with several cross-country transactions in the fields of international commercial and financial law to their credit.
India did not undertake any commitment in legal services during the Uruguay Round of negotiations. It has neither offered any commitments in its initial offer, nor in its revised offer submitted at the WTO in the ongoing services negotiations under GATS. International law firms are not allowed to establish offices in India. Indian advocates are not permitted to enter into profit-sharing arrangements with persons other than Indian advocates. Foreign law firms are also prohibited from giving any legal advice that could constitute practise of Indian law. Despite this, they have set up surrogate practice and are working in the guise of liaison offices.
Find More Articles By:
 
Magical Said:


Dear Sir, While it might not be Indian law firms that want the service sector to be thrown open, at some level businesses do require this. If not to have access to global legal advise at one shop then to have quality advise delivered timely. International competition will force Indian lawyers to start servicing clients more efficiently and also improve drafting skills which I have to say are dismal. Regards

Posted On 5/21/2008 11:06:46 PM
Abhishek Said:


Dear Mr. Bhasin I agree with your assertion that the arcane rules governing the Indian law firms needs to go before foreign law firms are allowed entry into India. I also agree that the new generation Indian lawyers have the expertise experience to handle complex international transactions, and they are quite commercially tuned in too. What lacks the Indian law firms is their commitment to the clients (the service quality and response time is tardy as will happen in any monopolistic market with AMSS, AZB, JSA, Luthra dominating the market). I have worked with these firms in connection with inbound investments and I was been appaled by the fact that a senior partner of one of the above mentioned big four did turn up for a meeting for which we had travelled from UK to India.

Posted On 5/27/2008 5:00:13 PM
amit Said:


Mr. Bhasin Is SILF a representative body of Indian lawyers? Or is it akin to the Bombay Club with membership limited to the influencial law firm 'owners', and you their spokesperson. As a lawyers working on my own, can't I contend that firms like Amarchand, Luthra and Bhasin & Company are doing the same thing to the smaller firms what they contend the big 'bad' international firms will do to them! I guess 'mercinary lawyers' are fine, as long as the 'warlords' are India..eh Mr. Bhasin? Kind Regards

Posted On 5/27/2008 6:58:28 PM
Foreign Said:


The author is presenting the standard emotional rhetoric that is now cliched as far as the old school Indian protectionist lawyers are concerned. However, some factual errors in this article: - Indian lawyers do not need to pass the QLTT to practice Indian law in the UK. They need it to hold themselves out as English solicitors; - Most UK firms (many of whose financials are available in the public domain) have seen an unprecedented growth in revenues and PPP in the last 5 years. They are not witnessing a 'negative growth'; - "Indian law firms have the requisite skill and technology to deal with high-profile work of any nature" - a cursory chat with any foreign client will immediately dispel this argument; The list can go on and on. The problem with this debate is that the most vocal participants have vested interests in the outcome.

Posted On 5/29/2008 8:38:24 AM
disgruntled Said:


Who is Mr Bhasin anyway...Bhasin & Co is a one-man show and that too an also ran! Why don't you do politics and leave the legal profession alone!

Posted On 6/24/2008 3:05:35 AM