Logwritten
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2009 9:30 PM IST

Stereotypes suck. Your sociology teacher probably gave you one of these speeches: “Stereotyping inhibits socializing, it doesn’t even give the person a chance. You go into an interaction with certain preconceived notions. This is unfair and can be harmful. One must never use stereo… SIDIN! STOP TALKING IN CLASS. YOU UNRULY, REBELLIOUS MALAYALI BOYS ARE SUCH PAINS IN THE BACKSIDE. WHY DON’T YOU GET A VISA AND GO TO DUBAI, TOO!… As I was saying people, we must never, ever use stereotypes…”

And, what is the great engine that helps spread such vile ethnic stereotypes all over the world? Bad advertising! And besides that? Global tourism!

With all this economic growth brouhaha, rising incomes and greater connectivity, more people are travelling across the world than ever before. The World Tourism Organization estimates that international tourism generates revenue of over $2 billion per day. And they expect this to grow by around 4% a year till 2020.

(Illustrations by Jayachandran / Mint)

(Illustrations by Jayachandran / Mint)

And the intrepid Indian is a sizeable chunk of this pie. A recent Kuoni report on Indian travel projects that India will despatch between 17 million and 20 million outbound tourists marching all over Sentosa, Mt Titlis, New York and other such top destinations by 2020. (Something spectacular, I assume, will happen to tourism in 2020. No one wants to project beyond that. Perhaps teleportation will finally become a reality. Or global warming will wipe out civilization. Either way, don’t make plans for that summer.)

Outfits such as Cox and Kings, Raj Travels, Kesari Tours and Travels and an ever blossoming number of travel websites have all begun to tap into this growth trend. But with more Indians going abroad on holidays, what is happening to the great Indian stereotype?

For centuries we were the land of colours, jewels, elephants, insane maharajas, the rope trick and graduate students in electronics engineering. We were also, by and large, seen as nice and friendly people.

No more. Apparently the globetrotting Indian tourist has put paid to this warm impression.

In 2007, Expedia, an international network of travel websites, published the Best Tourist League Survey report. They painstakingly asked 15,000 hoteliers across Europe what they thought of tourists from various countries. Which ones were polite? Which ones were well dressed? Which ones liked to try out local delicacies such as that Italian cheese which has, yum is the word, maggots thriving in it?

India came second. From the bottom. We were officially only better than the French who, it turns out, are le absolute pits when it comes to leisure travelling etiquette.

Our Chinese brethren, by the way, came in third. So poor is the prevalent reputation of Chinese trippers that in 2006 the government put out guidelines for outbound tourists. Littering, spitting, snatching bus seats and queue-jumping were some of the practices frowned upon.

1  2 3 4 
Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Harsh Said:


It is a shame that Indians came at the bottom of the list. Rudeness and impoliteness is not only a question of words but also gestures. After all, they say 60% of communication is non-verbal which includes hand gestures, body language and facial expressions. Hence, the lost in translation argument is not really applicable. Then again, why does translation and syntax not hinder other nationalities traveling to countries where their mother tongue is not spoken, such as for speakers of Spanish, German, Russian, Polish, Japanese, Korean, Malay and Arabic? In fact, many Indian languages are derived from the same roots as English, wherein Arabic, Japanese and Korean have completely different roots and hence have a stronger argument with regards to problems with syntax and translation is concerned. Would not tourists from other countries be also “more conscious and aware of” their behavior when they go abroad? I’m sure at least some of the cultures in the world, especially like the Hispanic culture of Latin American countries which have a lot in common with ours, are also conscious and aware of their behavior when traveling. But they don’t go around snapping and whistling to get attention of waiters. With regards to Indian sociability, there are many cultures as sociable as ours and either way that does not give us an excuse to be loud and make a scene. Actually, a number of people I have talked to have seen more friendly and sociable people on domestic flights within the United States compared to on domestic flights in India. They are more likely to greet you with a smile and make polite conversation.

Posted On 4/26/2008 6:17:40 PM
Harsh Said:


PART II Being thrifty is one thing and being stingy is another. It is completely understandable if people take the most economical vacation packages available. It is their prerogative how much they want to spend on a holiday, however I don’t think this is what the survey meant by Indians being penny pinching. It is attempt to bargain in every shop or store Indians visit, including places like Harrods (A very expensive department store in London, UK), which gives us a bad name. It is the measly tips we give the waiters or none that we give the taxi drivers. It is the aim to maximize usage of whatever we pay for, whether taking all the complimentary items from the hotel room, or keeping the driver of rented car till late at night just because we paid for the full day. With regards to food there is no question that most Indians, whatever their income or age, will try and eat Indian food wherever they go. Even today, Indians from the metros are no exception to this rule. Yes, people with dietary restrictions might not have much choice but that is restricted to a few like the Jains who don’t eat potatoes and onions. But even for the rest, it has always been Indian cuisine or maybe Thai, that to because it is similar to Indian. Everything else is too bland. No, the Indian love affair with spicy food continues. With regards to destination, I don’t think that affects rankings as much. What difference does it make where Indians go? That is each traveler’s choice. Yes, influence of Bollywood, proximity and cost does make a difference on where we choose to go. This may not help us get to the top of the “Best Tourist” list but I highly doubt that this should cause us to get negative points.

Posted On 4/26/2008 6:21:27 PM
Harsh Said:


Part III There is a difference between being famous and infamous. There is a difference between the stardom of Sachin Tendulkar and Paris Hilton or Osama bin Laden. Yes, we have “arrived”, but at the wrong destination. I don’t want to be on vacation and being treated differently because someone else did something to make the locals negatively stereotype all Indians. Most of all, I don’t want the world to think of Indians as rude, stingy and inconsiderate people. Indian tourists are ‘ambassadors’ of the country and that’s how they should behave. A little consideration for others would go a long way in changing perceptions. But how could one expect consideration from Indians abroad when we have no consideration for each other at home. I hope I’m proved wrong!

Posted On 4/26/2008 6:23:34 PM
Nikhil Said:


Awesome article. Truly funny!

Posted On 4/27/2008 10:47:42 PM