Logwritten
SUNDAY, JULY 20, 2008 5:42 AM IST
At the risk of creating possible scandal, I would like to state that I am not particularly fond of the Beatles. Well, maybe Paul McCartney a little bit. But that’s because Paul looks like he knows it’s all a joke anyway. At any moment, he may be expected to burst out laughing, owning up to some sort of super-charade: “We were lip-syncing all the time!” or “They were all actually sung by the Bee Gees!”
Runner-up: Jesus Christ trails the Beatles by 31 million hits on the Net.
Runner-up: Jesus Christ trails the Beatles by 31 million hits on the Net.
Their music is okay enough. In fact, I like a few Beatles numbers sufficiently to hum them when nothing by Dire Straits will come to mind (if I am in a situation involving yellow submersible oceancraft or walruses, for instance). It is the same with Metallica, Iron Maiden and (prepare for hate mail now) Pink Floyd. They all please me in moderation, but I don’t think I own any of their albums.
But, I do own several by Mark Knopfler, Sinatra, and Hootie and the Blowfish. Oh what the heck, I am married already…I also own a bunch by Boyzone, Outlandish and Vengaboys.
So, I am eternally fascinated by the mad frenzy that the Beatles create to this day. For a band that was active for just about a decade — the Bee Gees, in contrast, hit those high notes for 46 years — and produced just 13 albums, there’s something about the band that makes even the passing odd fact a global news item. A quick Google search for “Beatles” throws up slightly more than 64 million results (Jesus Christ, a rather popular man in his own right, gets a shade less than 33 million).
Which brings us to the important question: Why are the Beatles such a big deal? What did those gentlemen with sexless haircuts do that gave them fame, and fortune, that seems like it will last well after their, and our, days? Why do people throng to buy books like She Came In Through The Kitchen Window: Recipes Inspired by the Beatles and Their Music.
Last weekend I typed “Why were the Beatles successful?” in a Google search box and hit enter. Only 423,000 results appeared.
I found some enlightenment in the June 2001 issue of Reason magazine. In an essay called Still Fab, author Charles Paul Freund says that the Beatles improvised (and how!) music styles that were popular even before they came together. To this extent they were not the rock pioneers people make them to be. Also, and this is entirely Freund’s opinion, the Beatles were the greatest Pop music act ever. Pop, in a sense, is short for popular. Quod erat demonstrandum.
So yes, Freund thinks their pop music rocked big time. But there were more relevant non-musical reasons.
The Beatles arrived in the US during a turbulent time in American history. Kennedy was dead and war was on the horizon. Teenagers had just begun to challenge contemporary society and culture; a rebellion that would reach its apex with the Summer of Love. The Beatles’ was a voice that advocated love and goodness. And perhaps, it was this feeling of youthful, happy rebellion that deified the Liverpudlians.
The Beatles also heralded a spiritual rebellion. When baby boomers began to question their beliefs and faiths, the Beatles were there with tunes that goaded them along. The fab four cemented this reputation with their eponymous trip to India 40 years ago.
India did many things to the Beatles, collectively and individually, good and bad. The band composed some 48 songs while in India. But this was also when John began to fall away from his then wife Cynthia. Cracks began to deepen between members, with Ringo famously walking out of recording sessions later on in 1968.
By then India had already become “the spiritual dustbin of the world”, as Roshan Seth’s character called it in Kaizad Gustad’s Bombay Boys. Maharishis became superstars and everyone wanted to transcend. India, typically, welcomed the troubled and meditative with open arms.
Whether you’re a Beatlemaniac or not, you will enjoy our collection of features on the Beatles on our website. Perhaps the stories will evoke old memories. That secret dance night in college where you first boogied with the missus, maybe? Or perhaps, it will inspire you to go and get your first Beatles album. Eitherways, Ob-la-di, and have a great weekend. Send mail.
Priya Ramani is away until August. Catch up on her travels at Blogs.livemint.com.
Write to lounge@livemint.com
Tags - Find More Articles On:
Find More Articles By:
 
Warren Said:


It's easy to see if a person with his musical tastes, doesn't like The Beatles.

Posted On 5/17/2008 8:13:05 AM
Dave Said:


I suppose it's a question of taste. I always "got" the Beatles' music; it immediately stands out because of its musical complexity, great harmonies, and the way they made it all appear so effortless. But I have run into a few people who don't like the Beatles in addition to the Idiot who wrote the article I'm responding to. He is Obviously a Communist.

Posted On 5/17/2008 12:00:35 PM
Marc Said:


If it were not for The Beatles, there would be no India!!!

Posted On 5/17/2008 5:51:37 PM
steve Said:


if you listen to Dire Straits and hootie you must be gay....not that thats bad because its right for you..but leave off thinking about the Beatles you just dont get it

Posted On 5/17/2008 6:10:57 PM
j Said:


regardless of one's opinion of the beatles, why would anyone waste the space to publish such rambling drivel? i'm angry with myself for wasting time to read it; angrier still for wasting time to type this response. that the author dismisses the beatles and admits to owning hootie and the blowfish product completely demolishes any credibility she might otherwise have as an erstwhile music critic.

Posted On 5/19/2008 2:30:59 AM
the Said:


are the beatles still producing a "mad fenzy" 40 years up the line because they weren't up to much do you think? or because they really were the musical blue print for the latter part of the 20th century, or is it simply because people like yourself continue to write about them today?

Posted On 5/19/2008 2:42:43 AM
William Said:


The Beatles created such a frenzy even to this day because their music was so very good. The music is timeless and continues to draw in new young fans all the time. Most people who say they don't like the Beatles only know the Beatles through songs like "I Want to Hold Your Hand" or "Hard Day's Night", which are songs that I love, but those songs were only a very small part of their enormous variety. When people start to really listen to all of the other songs they created, most people who say they don't like the Beatles end up changing their mind and finally understanding why they are so loved and admired. My wife was one of those who didn't like the Beatles, until she started listening to all of my Beatles albums and now she agrees that they were the best band of all time. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion of course, but please listen to Abbey Road, and Sgt Pepper, and Rubber Soul, and Revolver, etc before rendering your opinion.

Posted On 5/19/2008 6:10:01 AM
ken Said:


My heart weeps for a man who prefers Dire Straits to the Beatles. Nuff said.

Posted On 5/19/2008 8:04:17 AM
eddie Said:


The beatles wrote the many of the greatest songs.Thousands of cover versions were made, many of them were hits i.e 3 number ones with a little help from my friends.Versions were made by just about everyone.Sinatra,Elvis,Stones.Oasis,stc.

Posted On 5/20/2008 3:43:10 PM
michel Said:


don't worry , it's not so important to like or not the beatles . I love them but I think we are in sufficient number not to count ourselves . It's not a big deal .However, the fact that you prefer dire straits seems a bit surprising to say the least .

Posted On 5/20/2008 5:56:23 PM
Mike Said:


I'm all for ''free speech'' but the people who write articles like this say more about themselves than they could ever say about The Beatles. As I have said before, if you have to explain the appeal of The Beatles to people, then you are talking to the wrong people. Nobody explained it to me.

Posted On 5/21/2008 11:29:18 AM