Logwritten
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2009 3:08 PM IST

Kingfisher has always said that they want to make Bangalore their operational base. And (Kingfisher owner Vijay) Mallya has requested for additional facilities. When they complained about the problems in the first two days, they complained in a very professional way, whatever they said was very justified. And we really solved it in a professional way. In view of this, I can’t understand the bad remarks from Mallya about us. Because he has the least reasons to speak like that. He asked for a lounge, we have given him that, he has a Kingfisher bar there. Whatever he requested, we have given him. He wanted space for office, we have given it. But they are yet to begin work on it. I personally do not understand why he made such remarks.

We have offered him whatever he wanted—office space, MRO (maintenance, repair and overhaul facility). The first time he came to the airport, he may have expected a much bigger airport, which is grand. But we have always said we do not want to build a status symbol, we want a functional airport; whenever the need arises, we can increase the size. Maybe he was disappointed...

Comparison with GMR Hyderabad International Airport Ltd, which built a bigger facility relatively more smoothly?

We wanted construction of the airport (to take off) in 2002. We could begin construction around mid-2005, the time we wanted to open the airport! During the same time we had unprecedented gowth in aviation, because we had a proactive civil aviation minister who opened the skies. They allowed new airlines.

Our promoters were disappointed with the slow progress... It would have been impossible for us to go to the board to tell them that we will be building a bigger airport and we need to redesign. Nobody would invest one additional rupee for that—they never knew whether we would succeed or not. I made a new traffic study and went to the board for additional money. We had two choices—either we stop and redesign, which will result in further delay or begin construction and during construction, try as much as possible to expand the airport without delaying the opening. We increased the scope of our contractors by 70% without delaying the opening date. We went from Rs1,412 crore to Rs1,930 crore and finally we had to increase (the cost) to Rs2,470 crore because of delays.

Hyderabad, which was two or three years behind us, were carefully watching. They even copied our concession agreement and it is not a joke.

It is said within a year Bial will get full in terms of handling capacity...

(Interrupts)... It makes me angry. Even the ministry speaks about annual capacity. There is nothing called annual capacity. Peak-hour capacity (is what matters). We don’t have peak hour for 24 hours.

If airlines want to operate, when the slots are full between 6 and 8, we ask them to come the next hour and we have space. You spread the peaks over the day, if you could do that over 24 hours, then our capacity would be 24 million.

What are the indications on the past one month in terms of traffic?

Presently, we get a feeling that there is a slowdown. It may be a seasonal slowdown, it is a slow season now. But we should see how it grows. Let us assume that we have an increase of 15%, then next year we may have around 11.5-12 million, this we can handle, another 10% we can handle, then it will be a bit tight.

But for two-three years down the line, infrastructure building has to start now. Right ?

Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Vikram Said:


Mr. Brunner, I think is being foolish, when he says and I quote "The city will lose out having a strong airport and an opportunity to attract lot of international airlines and make it stronger. Airlines are already losing money." Hasn't he ever been to London where they have two airports operating - Heathrow & Gatwick - Is that a loss to London??? No - instead I think it's brilliant a concept and India should also have two airports in the high traffic volume cities - Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore, etc.

Posted On 7/8/2008 9:25:33 AM
Veeresh Said:


Albert Brummer must be indeed a very happy man - the interview carried in your newspaper on the 8th of July'08 let him off the hook on all the really contentious issues that any regular user of the new airport in Bengaluru will point out. To start with, the air-cargo terminal is far from ready - as a result, all landside activity is still carried out at the old HAL Airport. Customs seem to be absent at BIAL cargo. In other words, documents flow up and down from BIAL to HAL, which increase the demurrage charges at BIAL, which works fine for BIAL I guess. That's a major component of any revenue at any airport in the world - passengers are not as profitable, simply put. Next, for the bulk of the passengers travelling to and from BIAL by BMTC buses, crossing other road traffic at least twice is an invitation to disaster. A very simple change in the flow would enable bus passengers to embark and disembark right on the main landing area, but no, that would make things very simple and impact parking as well as taxi franchisee revenues. So, bus passengers are pushed away into a distance, and then they need to scurry through other road traffic. This does not happen in any other world airport, not even in Zurich, so Brummer would know. Please also take a look at the width of the staircases provided to take passengers from the check-in area to the security area upstairs. There are international standards on how wide these stair-cases should be, in case they are needed to be used for emergency evacuations, and these do not confirm. We also do not see so much fire-fighting and life-saving equipment as we see at airports worldwide - and if it is there, then maybe some signage might help. The area around BIAL used to be fertile and green, and has now been reduced to a dust-bowl, so much so that 10-15 minutes outside and you will need a shower. Provision for which, even if payment is made, is not available. Provincial Airport, BIAL, actually.

Posted On 7/10/2008 10:49:01 AM
Raghu Said:


Why on earth should a huge infrastructure project like an airport, be designed in such a way tht it "breaks even" in 5 years ? They shd target a break even in 20-30 years and thats the way all infrastructure projects operate all over the world. Here, the idea is tht they have to be a "monopoly" and that they must be able to do everything on their own terms. Good to see tht Mr. Brunner is not even making an iota of effort to hide the fact tht this is a real-estate money making enterprise. I wud propose tht the govt: treat BIAL not as a public service utility but as a profit making enterprise and hence, revoke all the orders waivering stamp duty, tax, levy etc and must not give it the status of an SEZ. They shd also open HAL airport immediately and all low cost airlines must be operating out of HAL. Theres no other way to protect public interest.

Posted On 7/10/2008 3:09:02 PM
Vishvas Said:


Mr. Brunner's argument look more like ones for the sake of doing so. There does not appear to be any logic in what he says. I dont think one would like to pay a UDF for the horrible, sub-standard facilities at BIAL. This airport is nothing better than the HAL airport. I boarded an International Flight out of BIAL and there was only one flight at the time I boarded. The security hold area looked too full and claustrophobic. The domestic area is no better. Early in the mornings, there would be queues for the toilets! What planning is this!!!! This is just a transfer of monopoly from AAI to BIAL. Given so much of resources, there is little doubt in my mind that AAI would have done more or less the same job.

Posted On 7/21/2008 4:06:02 PM