Logwritten
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2009 7:51 PM IST

Mumbai: With just a few months left for the Reserve Bank of India, or RBI, to decide on whether to open the country’s financial sector to foreign banks, there is

Expert view: (top, from left) Panelists K.C. Chakrabarty, chairman of Punjab National Bank; Sanjay Nayar, CEO of Citigroup India; K.V. Kamath, managing director and CEO of ICICI Bank; Tamal Bandyopadhyay, Mint’s Mumbai bureau chief; O.P. Bhatt, chairman and managing director of State Bank of India; Neeraj Swaroop, CEO of Standard Chartered Bank; and Gunit Chadha, managing director and CEO of Deutsche Bank at the Mint Annual Banking Conclave held in front of an invitation-only audience in Mumbai on Monday; (below) Nayar, Chakrabarty, Chadha, Kamath and Bhatt share a light moment before the conclave begins; (above) Chadha, Kamath and other panelists head for the discussion table. While Chadha insisted that foreign banks can indeed participate in financial inclusion in a much more cost-efficient manner if they are allowed to enter semi-urban and even rural areas, Bhatt warned that India’s development goals using public sector banks will be hampered if foreign banks are allowed to enter the country en masse and significantly ramp up competition. Abhijit Bhatlekar / Mint

Expert view: (top, from left) Panelists K.C. Chakrabarty, chairman of Punjab National Bank; Sanjay Nayar, CEO of Citigroup India; K.V. Kamath, managing director and CEO of ICICI Bank; Tamal Bandyopadhyay, Mint’s Mumbai bureau chief; O.P. Bhatt, chairman and managing director of State Bank of India; Neeraj Swaroop, CEO of Standard Chartered Bank; and Gunit Chadha, managing director and CEO of Deutsche Bank at the Mint Annual Banking Conclave held in front of an invitation-only audience in Mumbai on Monday; (below) Nayar, Chakrabarty, Chadha, Kamath and Bhatt share a light moment before the conclave begins; (above) Chadha, Kamath and other panelists head for the discussion table. While Chadha insisted that foreign banks can indeed participate in financial inclusion in a much more cost-efficient manner if they are allowed to enter semi-urban and even rural areas, Bhatt warned that India’s development goals using public sector banks will be hampered if foreign banks are allowed to enter the country en masse and significantly ramp up competition. Abhijit Bhatlekar / Mint

little consensus among bankers from some of the largest public, private and foreign banks on the much anticipated issue.

At Mint’s fifth Clarity Through Debate series, top executives of State Bank of India, or SBI, ICICI Bank Ltd, Punjab National Bank, Citigroup, Standard Chartered Bank and Deutsche Bank AG discussed “Should the Country Open Up the Financial Sector?”.

The panelists at the Mint Debate, held on Monday in front of an invitation-only audience here, were, however, clear that more Indian companies shouldn’t be allowed into the country’s banking sector and that the best route to allow the foreign banks in India to expand would be through setting up of a wholly owned subsidiary.

But the current guidelines about such subsidiaries of foreign banks are not clear and need to be modified before foreign banks can consider that route, said several of the bank CEOs participating in the Mint Debate moderated by Tamal Bandyopadhyay, who writes the Monday Banker’s Trust column and is also Mint’s Mumbai bureau chief.

The Indian banks’ charge was led by K.V. Kamath, managing director and CEO, ICICI Bank, who said India is a far more open country than most developed countries when it came to bank licences, and that the same level of reciprocity given to a foreign bank in India is never awarded in most countries to Indian banks looking to expand overseas.

Kamath said that out of the 18 countries that ICICI Bank operates in, 16 — including several developed ones — aren’t as welcoming as India has been towards foreign banks. “We need to ask this question, ‘why are these markets closed, why should we open?’” he said. “If they want to access our market, they should allow us to access their market as well.”

1  2 3 4 
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Zahid Said:


Though we do not have any survey to compare community-wise financial exclusion in India, the study of data available through Sachar Committee report reflects Muslims are the most disadvantaged community in financial sector, and banking is inversely related to concentration of Muslim population. Muslims have over 80% Muslims financial exclusion due to interest-based deposit and credit schemes available with formal financial institutions and SCBs. Due to restriction on Islamic banking mechanism in India, the financial sector was one of the most unflavoured sectors for Indian Muslims. This reflects participation of Muslim workers in RBI and SCBs as well because with population share of 13.47%, Muslims have 0.78% and 2.2% share in employment with RBI and SCBs. Similarly the participation of Muslims with specialized financial institutions and corporations such as SIDBI, NABARD and NMDFC is miserable. Hard to believe that Institutions such as National Minority Development and Finance Corporation (NMDFC) have no Muslim employees. This has excluded Indian Muslims from formal financial and banking sector in India and to get rid of interest with meeting the banking and financial needs, wherever Muslims are concentrated; they find practice interest free banking through societies and NBFCs. With inception of Islamic banking it is expected that Muslims will join Islamic banks which will remove their financial exclusion. The Indian Muslims have a share of 7.4% in saving deposits while just get 4.7% of credit in terms of PSAs. If we consider this as a standard proportion in national aggregate deposits with and credits maintained by SCBs, Indian Muslims annually lose around Rs66,700 crore because Muslims have a credit deposit ratio of 47% against national average of 74%. It shows that Muslims of India lose around 27% of their deposits by not availing as credits. After Islamic banking, this deficit may be removed to curb financial loss to Indian Muslims because with 31% Muslims living below poverty line and 40% Muslim workers as own-account workers, the deficit of credit is like economic assassination of the community. Muslims avail just 4% and mere 0.48% credits from special financial institutions such as NABARD and SIDBI respectively because there also the community has to indulge in interest which is strictly prohibited in Islam. The schemes launched by RBI, NABARD, SIDBI and Ministry of Finance for financial inclusion focus on providing access to credit and other financial products. Can allowing access to Mutton shops for non vegetarians yield inclusion of non vegetarians to mutton retails? Definitely not, because Vegetarians do not need Mutton shops, but seek access to retail shops of vegetables only. Similarly to remove financial inclusion of Indian Muslims, Indian financial sector regulators need to provide access to interest free banking and finance to Indian Muslims, because interest is so strictly prohibited for Muslims that it is more acute than prohibition of muttons for vegetarians. The operation of Islamic banking will allow the Muslims to work with majority community in banking sector and it would definitely help us build civil society economy. With introduction of Islamic banking in India, the 150 million Indian Muslims would enjoy their religious rights in banking sector with provision to get rid of interest which is strictly prohibited in Islam. This may please the second largest community of India who are somehow uncomfortable with linking of recent terrorist attacks with only Muslim community or in other the terminology of Islamic terrorism. With introduction of Islamic banking, Indian government will certainly gain diplomatic advantages to make financial dealings with Muslim dominated nations especially to attract a trillion dollars of equity finance from gulf countries.

Posted On 9/16/2008 11:00:43 PM
Bhasker Said:


I fully agree with CEO of ICICI bank Mr Kamath, why suold India go out of it,s way for the foreign banks to expand in India. Indian banks are not given the same oppertunity in the west. Mahtama Gandhi kicked them out and now we are well coming them, or they are trying to get in through back door.Smell of East India company all the way through. We do not need these people in our country.

Posted On 9/17/2008 7:53:37 PM
khurram Said:


Though RBI has still got some time to re-think on the issue of opening indian market to foreign banks but in my opinion our market is still not that mature to handle the competition of the leading banks like the Bank Of China.Imagine indian market captured by Chinese banks the same way as the chinese products are flooding Indian market.It must also be kept in mind that no country allows a foreign competitor to step on its soil untill it is fully prepared to stand against it.china it self was a closed economy untill few years back.so RBI must work hard towards extending the licence date for the entry of Foreign banks.

Posted On 8/7/2009 5:46:55 PM