Logwritten
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2009 6:51 PM IST

New Delhi: The Tata NEN Hottest Startups Awards campaign, an ambitious attempt at the largest start-up competition in India covering some 1,000 ventures that are less than five years old, is only three weeks old but has been dogged by questions in the blog world.

The organizers of the competition, for which Mint is the official print partner, have come under fire in at least three blogs which allege that the National Entrepreneurship Network, or NEN, a non-profit organization aimed at encouraging start-ups, has acted unprofessionally. One such instance involved NEN writing to a start-up that it had been nominated by Pluggd.in, a blog that profiles and reviews Indian start-ups. This was incorrect, said Pluggd.in on its blog.

Laura Parkin, executive director, National Entrepreneurship Network.

Laura Parkin, executive director, National Entrepreneurship Network.

In an interview, Laura Parkin, executive director of NEN, concedes the error. Pluggd.in hadn’t nominated the start-up and its name had been merely obtained from a list of start-ups developed by Pluggd.in. NEN used several lists, including those from The Indus Entrepreneurs and industry lobby Confederation of Indian Industry, or CII. Edited excerpts:

There has been some talk in blogosphere that some processes followed by NEN in the start-up competition have not been professional. Questions have been raised on forcible nominations following a blog post by TringMe founder Yusuf Motiwala. What is the issue?

The issue with TringMe was the nomination was online and he emailed the contact person (to withdraw it). Unfortunately, there was an internal miscommunication so we did not close the loop in bringing the nomination down. The minute we found out that, we immediately apologized, took the nomination down. We’ve now created three email IDs so that requests from participants don’t get lost in any way. If you want to change your nomination, email changes@hotteststartups.in; to withdraw, withdraw@hotteststartups.in; and the third is to reconfirm you want your nomination to go online at confirm@hotteststartups.in

Now, with every single step, when we email the entrepreneur, we include a reminder that if you want to change or withdraw, here are the email addresses to do so.

Is it possible for someone other than the entrepreneur to nominate the company?

No, it is actually not possible to force a nomination. If we’ve heard about you or somebody else has and told us about you, our first step is to assign an internal contact person who will send you an email saying so and so has nominated you and do you want to participate. If you say no, it ends there. If you say yes, we email you the nomination form. The nomination form is only filled out by the entrepreneur (or someone he nominates); we do not fill it out. It takes at least an hour so it can’t be done by others accidentally. TringMe had already filled out the nomination form and wanted to withdraw later. Even if a company self-nominates online, we still review it and check with the entrepreneur.

Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Sunil Said:


No one responds to these email's mentioned in the article !

Posted On 10/14/2008 10:13:20 PM
purnima Said:


Hi, Since it is a new initiative hiccups is not a crime. Timely corrections are also acceptable. What is not acceptable is there is no corrective action for the gaps these hiccups have caused. It is pretty bad to see not one but a number of processes are unprofessional. While the competition first level if 50:50 for expert’s comments and voting, both areas work so-so. Moreover we feel the voting opportunity was snatched away by a minimum of 60% by the following: 1.During a period of time when the traffic was at peak, either the site was too slow to open or the page was not found to vote. We were “fortunate” to be in at that period. The effort to get clients to vote was a frustrating task. 2. Exactly during the same period the SMS got clogged. SMS sent received responses like “server busy”, “we cannot accept your request now” etc. So again the voting opportunity reduced. 3. The mail id validation for voting was introduced some 7-10 days back again has a problem. The mail confirmation link is sometimes not received at all and sometimes days later. The situation in point 1 & 2 may have been temporary but this is supposed to be a competition? The hits are captured what happens to the misses? Why conduct a competition which does not provide equal opportunities for exposure, effective voting mechanism, openness of panel / experts, right spirit of competition? Instead of just ‘rectifying SMS issues’ wont it be more encouraging to get from the SP the number of votes which has reached their server (or SMS which are charged), compare with your server to see the gap in votes and give the credit to the deserving? Of course not all gaps can be filled but most can... to bring in certain amount of spirit of the competition. Thanks, Purnima Varadrajan CEO www.ipott.com

Posted On 11/5/2008 8:12:04 AM