Logwritten
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2009 1:08 PM IST

Mumbai: The rush for patents in India among foreign-owned and large Indian companies in the world’s second fastest growing major economy is not new. But as scores of firms and individuals scramble to get protection for their technologies and products, what is coming to light is the cosy relationship between patent controllers, the Indian government officials who decide whether or not to grant a patent, and patent “agents” filing applications for patents.

While it is difficult to prove specific wrongdoing in patents being granted, a Mint investigation, activists seeking transparency in India’s patent granting process as well as a report by an Austrian government entity all point to a nexus between government officials and private law firms that point to significant conflicts of interest and favouritism in the patent granting process.

Most of the 20 or so people Mint spoke to for this in-depth look at India’s patent granting process would only speak if they were not identified or if their information was used as background. Almost all the law firms named in this story declined to comment on specific questions posed by Mint.

These patent agents, often large and established law firms, who file some 90% of the patent applications in India’s four patent offices—in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai—have nurtured relationships in each office and are very powerful in this commercially crucial department.

The rush in demand for patents in India has its roots in a 2004 amendment to India’s Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) law that added a few industries, such as agro-chemicals, food and drugs, to a product patent regime. It threw up an opportunity for companies— including foreign-owned ones —to patent their products in India, which, with its 1.1 billion-plus people, offers a significant domestic market for these firms.

This has in turn put professional patent filing services offered by the law firms, specializing in intellectual property law, in high demand.

“More than 80% of our clients are multinational companies, who want to file national phase applications in India,” said a senior patent attorney at DePenning and DePenning, a Kolkata-based law firm that has a strong practice in Chennai, a key city because of its patent office. The attorney did not want to be named.

Also seeAgent muscle?

De Penning is not alone.

There are at least a dozen law firms, including Remfry and Sagar, DP Ahuja and Co., Anand and Anand, RK Dewan and Co., among others, that serve a significantly large clientele base of foreign-owned firms for patent filing in India.

According to V. Rangasamy, assistant controller of patents and designs at Chennai, a majority of foreign patent applications filed in the Chennai patent office is through De Penning.

A patent official in Mumbai also notes that “there are two or three law firms, including Remfry and RK Dewan, (who) file (a) large chunk of corporate applications here”.

Patents logjam

1  2 3 4 5 6 
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Vikas Said:


This is simply a great report...Brings out the hollowness of our patent examination machinery...something needs to be done 1 I know both of you Unni and Khushboo and feel proud that such nice investigations are being brought out...

Posted On 10/10/2008 5:42:04 PM
Nishanthi Said:


Dear Readers of Live Mint, The above said article brings bad impression on patent system in India. Since I am close to this patent system and very surprise to see a patent official's experience in the patent office. As I know that he never ever attended the office in time and also very irregular. He is also a sadist person. He records the chats of his friends in the mobile and blackmail them in public. Similarly he behaves with the higher authorities in the disgusted manners. Many of his colleagues who joined in lean were made confirmed in the patent office. Because of his conduct and character he was left out without punishments. So I request the live mint editors to see the genuine of a person who is commenting on the Government Offices. As the government is always kind enough on its servants he is freely talking now. Always talk the facts. The examiner in U.S and/or in Europe is provided with the leading databases and also flexible working timings. Also paid heavily with lot of perks against the Indian examiners. With the available infrastructures the Indian examiners are very well working with the latest trends. Though they are dependent on other search reports which they learn by themselves without formal training from the office and their hard work. Apart from the examinations, these examiners are working very honestly and helping the visitors who need the patent information. I am very much surprised to read an article against the exceptional government office such as 'The Patent Office'. Because of these examiners the patent offices stand like IT firms. Please don't comment without knowing the facts.

Posted On 10/13/2008 5:11:53 PM
Nishanthi Said:


Instead of pointing fingers on the patent system create awareness among the people the importance of patent system. The media should always be helpful not only in bringing the negative points which are very baseless but also bring positive approaches and for the like patent systems people should be made more aware. As of now the people in India knows that the patents are meant only for Research Institutions and great inventors and also time consuming. The renowned website journals like Livemint should help the public by imparting the positives of the patent system and its advantages. As long as we talk about the castes,negatives of society and government...the same will live longer. So please step forward to approach the same problem in different aspects.

Posted On 10/13/2008 5:40:49 PM
Nishanthi Said:


Dear Readers, I would like to clear/ to be cleared some of the things from the above article and the comments. Let us first deal what is corruption is. Possible ways of corruption in Patent system, 1. For mobilizing the patent applications 2. For issuing the receipts / patent certificates at the earliest At most one can do with the money the above said corruptions in Patent office. Examiners are never ever involved in the above said ways. In Europe patent drafting is being carried by the patent examiners as part time work. Moreover one should clearly understand the difficulty in writing patents. This is not publishing in International Journals. Even for that a research scholar knew very well the difficulties in publishing his own paper. Patent is summation of Legal and (Highly) technical documents. We can relate the patent drafting to the doctor's work. The government doctor should not practice privately. CAN ANYONE HERE DISPROVE THAT THE GOVERNMENT DOCTORS ARE WORKING PRIVATELY? As against the issuing of car licenses the advantage of patent system is that anyone can oppose an invention. That's why this is always called 'NEGATIVE RIGHT' or unusual right compared to other rights. Of course I am not supporting the examiners who are drafting but it should be made legal in Indian scenario as in European scenarios. Also one should aware of patent processes. If you feel like a patent is given for an application that does not involve invention you can oppose that invention in the Patent Office, IPAB and High Court by filing relevant forms.

Posted On 10/15/2008 12:20:42 PM
Nishanthi Said:


Actually I am unable to understand why the examiners are here pointed for corruption. Corruption means doing against law and forcing the people for silly things to be done. If anyone proves that the examiners are getting money for passing a particular file, it will be good. And Indian patent examiners are post graduates and very highly qualified AND DEDICATED that the government is not properly utilizing them. So please know the facts before commenting. Because of examiners the patent office looks like an IT firm and functioning very rapidly. No one can deny the said argument. One good thing here is that the awareness with the public on patents had increased compared to ester years. But the in and outs of patent system should be known. It is highly techno-legal. Even leading lawyers are not aware of patent procedures. So commenting on patenting procedures like commenting on the other public interacted government offices is not justifiable.because of one or two people one should not ratify the entire group even if one or two really exists. This article really hurts the feelings of genuine personalities.

Posted On 10/15/2008 12:24:53 PM
Akhilesh Said:


Here I totally agree with what Nishanthi has said. May be some people in the Patent office are bad, it does not mean to say the same to the patent office. We should be happy to have the patent office like any other MNC. And as Nishanthi has already said, patent is not like issuing car licenses that you just apply and get. The best thing with patent system is that anybody can file pre-grant and post-grant opposition request. So if you want bad patent not to granted, you should come ahead and oppose the patent. This spirit is required instead of accusing patent office. And for that, the first and essential step is to create proper awareness of the patent and patent system in the public. About current level of awareness, you can think, if you talk to somebody about Intellectual Property, they get it similar to real estate property. So we should let the people know the importance of patent and patent system. And now about the negative points; Dr Kalam has once made it in his one speech that Indian media should stop highlighting negative points and focus on positive points; but who cares. Everybody knows what are the worst; the castes, poverty, improper health, and improper education; why media does not focus on these issues. Until and unless we convert these worst into proper, we can’t expect from our people.

Posted On 10/29/2008 10:49:31 AM