Logwritten
SUNDAY, JULY 05, 2009 2:47 AM IST
Can design have an impact on the practical realities of everyday life? A slowdown usually impacts office real estate in the form of slashed budgets or relocation to smaller (and perhaps less inspiring) workplaces. But a little imagination can go a long way in working around many common site constraints.
Too little space
Physical limitations are always a challenge. One can avoid bruised egos and bite-sized cubicles, though, when moving to a smaller workplace. New Delhi-based Sabyasachi Sen and Associates were asked to relocate the office and library of the British Council in Kolkata from a generous 15,000 sq. ft, to a compact 7,000 sq. ft.
Dimensions of partitions and storage units were tweaked to suit the council’s needs. Divider panels between workstations were lowered to allow for greater personal contact, and desks were extended to accommodate each team’s printer. Flat screen monitors saved space by reducing the depth of the workstation and eliminating the need for a keyboard tray. Creative use of storage units in particular — as partition walls and as a support for printers — allowed the council’s staff to move without losing precious data storage space.
And a problem of plenty
Too much space can pose its own problems, as architect Ritu Dimri of New
Delhi-based Vyakt realized when asked to transform a 10,000 sq. ft factory shed into a corporate headquarters for Duphar Interfran, a Thane-based pharmaceutical company.
Artful navigation of company hierarchy solved the dual issues of too much, and too little, space. Senior managers were allotted sheer square footage while junior office workers were placed in the double-height area with maximum volume, enjoying unparalleled ceiling heights. At the same time, “islands” of workstations were located to create intimacy so that no one felt lost. The same colour palette was deftly applied to seating, furniture systems, niches in the walls, ceilings and columns to divert attention from height differences.
Maxi-sizing
Creating the illusion of a large space is an integral part of an architect’s repertoire. Mirrors, glass partitions and whitewashed walls are trademark devices to enlarge an area.
Nayan Shah of Ahmedabad-based Studio Eethetics took a bolder route when asked to visually expand a 270 sq. ft office for Achal Shah, a structural engineer based in Ahmedabad. He redefined the volume of the structural engineer’s office by inserting two strong vertical insertions in the cubic shell. Large, porthole-like punctures in the two partitioned walls divided the office into two distinct work areas while simultaneously ensuring a continuous telescopic view from each end of the width of the space. The dark floor became a smooth, deft plane into which the circular cut-outs seem to be embedded.
Bringing the sky in
Innovative use of ceilings can also dramatically alter the perceptions of a
physical space.
The Mumbai office of Birla Sun Life Insurance was located in a long and narrow space, with low ceilings. Architect Aruni Patil of Mumbai-based Anurup Designs devised a strategically placed cut-out in the ceiling to give the feel of a vaulted space. The colourful, lit cut-out gave life to the workstations and nullified the linear constraints of the site.
Aparna Piramal Raje is director, BP Ergo. Radhika Desai is a Mumbai-based interior architect.
Write to us at workscapes@livemint.com
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Rajesh Said:


The authors opinion that "A slowdown usually impacts office real estate in the form of slashed budgets or relocation to smaller (and perhaps less inspiring) workplaces." and “One can avoid bruised egos and bite-sized cubicles, though, when moving to a smaller workplace” is not correct. Inspiration & workplaces has no relation with one another, for real performers and achievers. Similarly,if person’s ego get’s bruised when moving to smaller workplaces in organization, then it is very clear that the person in organization, is not there for working for organization but for satisfying his or her ego. Smaller workplaces can only result in inconvenience in working, it should not have any linkage with ego. People who have been provided big offices and air conditioned chambers and huge perquisites,(& their egos satisfied as per author’s criteria) they are not performing or are least performers. But they are smart enough to present themselves, as they are biggest contributor in the growth of organization. They are busy in giving impressive lectures only. In industries, I had seen many people who have been provided very nice & comfortable workplace, but their work output is almost zero. They are busy in thinking for whose work I can take credit and go up in ladder without any efforts. Mr. Rudolf Diesel, the inventor of diesel engine has got a passion to contribute for betterment of society,he worked day & night, ( & of course without any todays Modern A/C office as shown in your articles.) and gave to world a new direction. For people like Mr.Rudolf, a simple table & chair used to suffice, because for them, their ultimate goal of benefiting the humanity was on top priority and not of grabbing a lavish office & perquisite associated with it.

Posted On 10/25/2008 11:24:47 PM
Re: Latha Said:


Very correctly pointed out by Rajesh, I think you should write a book which brings out a real life things in an industry, in front of new comers in industry, so that they need not waste their years in understanding the real people behind sugar coated tongue & superficial humbleness showing peoples.So, that good & honest people does not fall in their traps.Keep it up, writing such honest feedback.I liked your feedback in case of other articles on this site.

Posted On 11/11/2008 12:57:23 PM
Re: Bhushan Said:


Mr.Rajesh, you have written realistic situation in an industry, but you should, i think agree to my opinion that for all this unfair things that are going in an industry,it is mainly because of the careless attitude of promoters and their Board Of Directors,in majority of cases. They are simply busy in getting huge profits, salaries, and commission on profits, from their companies and enjoying parties.They are least bothered about the quality of people they hire. They are least bothered how people in their organisation are treating one another in reality,and not in presence of topmost bosses. Once in a year they(promoters & BOD) visit their companies as a picnic place. So, unless they have got a well placed grievance redressal mechanism for employees (with full transparency and direct approach to the promoters in case of failure of grievance redressal mechanism) this type of unfair things and injustice will prevail in organisation.In the end it is the company also, alongwith honest & dedicated peoples which has to pay the price for such unfair practices by selfish people, that are in orgainsation.The organisation where, honest & dedicated peoples are victimised,in such organisation, this people will ultimately leave it and what are left, are people and group of people who are greedy, selfish and corrupted.Then one can imagine the fate of an organisation having such peoples.This is a constructive criticism for improving the organisation's performance, and i hope it will be taken positively by the readers and policy makers and implementers in the companies.

Posted On 11/18/2008 12:29:02 PM