Log has written
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009

As he accepted the Democratic Party’s nomination in August to take on Republican John McCain in what has been a historically significant effort to become the 44th president of the United States, Barack Obama said this of America, “We are a better country than this.”

In light of what happened in the US economy since and the global mayhem that has ensued, we couldn’t agree more. And that belief is one singular reason why this newspaper, published some 11,977km away from the White House, is today formally endorsing Obama as the best person to be elected the next president of the US.

We believe the world’s largest economy—and its political, cultural and intellectual capital— still make America the essential nation. The current economic and stock markets crises, we hope, end up being seen as a transformational crisis because what failed us wasn’t necessarily free markets, something Mint has proudly stood for since its own birth, but greed abetted by a failure of transparency. The danger, as some of our columnists have pointed out in recent weeks, is that the very US-led global financial bailout will make some push for a permanent role for governments and bureaucrats in running all aspects of many economies. When those voices become as loud and irrational as those bullish voices that created the crisis, America, we think, will again have to play a vital role in shaping that global debate, just as the US government acted quickly and decisively—while many governments, including that of India, just talked—once the magnitude of the current problem was clear. This is vital because the past few weeks have clearly shown how interlinked we all are, no matter where one lives. As an Irish proverb says, “It is in the shelter of each other that the people live.”

Barack Obama

Barack Obama

Therefore, the fact that the past eight years under George W. Bush have seen a disastrous slide in America’s global standing don’t necessarily give us much cheer even if there are some who want to see a false silver lining in this decline, perhaps a faster rise for China and, maybe, even India.

Today’s America is one whose health is weak and, more importantly, whose morale is low. For good reason. Under eight years of post-Bill Clinton Republican rule in America, some five million citizens of that wealthy nation have fallen into poverty while seven million more citizens are now without health insurance.

A US-started war and the resultant fighting has already gone on longer than America’s involvement in World War II, killing tens of thousands, Americans and Iraqis alike. America’s national debt has almost doubled and is close to $10 trillion, and the Bush administration has run up what looks like a $500 billion—and mounting—federal deficit (even as it spent at least $600 billion on the Iraq conflict), after starting its term with a $700 billion surplus in 2001.

Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Ray Said:


I can understand the kid, green behind the ears, endorsing Obama. After all that's what youth's supposed to be about, lotsa energy, not much sense. But then when a Business Newspaper like HT Mint endorses Obama by stating, 'Eight years of Bush have altered the world for the worse. The time to repair this is now. The Democratic Party candidate is the man for the job'; I gotta guffaw and maybe take back what I said about the 'young'. Age ain't a criterion, 'blindness' afflicts the young and the old. Let me now get to HT Mint's Obama endorsement. I quote; 'Today’s America is one whose health is weak and, more importantly, whose morale is low. For good reason. Under eight years of post-Bill Clinton Republican rule in America, some five million citizens of that wealthy nation have fallen into poverty while seven million more citizens are now without health insurance.' In response let me quote from Ben Stein; 'But the advocates for poor and black people had immense political clout. Under President Bill Clinton, they passed legislation that called on banks to be required to lend to non credit worthy borrowers. The laws, including the Community Reinvestment Act, the CRA, required two large government sponsored enterprises, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to buy those lower quality mortgages from the banks, guarantee them, and sell them to the public. These were bundled into immense pools of subprime mortgages as they were called, and sold all over the world.' So you see, who's REALLY responsible? Read my complete response at http://buyerbehaviour.blogspot.com

Posted On 10/31/2008 10:30:15 AM
Re: Santosh Said:


I don't think even after economic slowdown Americans will elect Obama as their president. As Mr Ray said the current turmoil is caused by Democrats decision to force banks especially government-sponsored enterprises such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to lend to non credit worthy borrowers. The route cause for subprime lies in this legislation by Democrats. Bush had called for reform of Mae and Freddie Mac and Democrats ignored his warnings. I haven't seen any Indinian media highlighting this. Some India media tend to put blame on Bush for the economic crises. They say it caused due to Iraq and Afghanistan war for which US spent almost a trillion. The war on Iraq was necessary for US for its energy security. Republican policy on energy security is apt for US they have some vision. Republicans want the ban on offshore exploring to be lifted. They want better and safer nuclear energy programme and do away with coal gas based power turbines. I am sure America will have veteran war hero McCain as its new President. And only he can solve the Taliban terrorism

Posted On 11/4/2008 4:52:54 PM
tirumalasetty Said:


Go Barry Go! First things first,I have been subscriber to your print edition almost since its inception. This is only second time I am eager to respond to any news item. It is by sheer coincidence that both articles related to Brarak Obama.In my view both Barak Obama and Mint have similarities. While former is product of American dream, later is chronicler of Indian dream. Both has heralded a change –you can be anybody you wanted to be and can still stick to the ethics (what better example one can get other than the one page article written by the editor delineating what this paper stand for on the first anniversary) and true to your name you have been minting than usual scripting the Indian dreams which I am sure will be seen long long time to come. Your endorsement of Barak Obama along with the reasons and facts given in the editorial only reinforced my belief. I think this particular American election campaign is being watched by many people all around the world, especially in India because it is prominently shown in our media. The under dog theory really made people to look close and know about a man called Barak Obama. In a way it can be said that he changed the way people see the world like, “so what he has got the all qualification, he still coloured to so what if he is coloured, he is still qualified”. Barak Obama shared good rapport with the people. He made himself very clear. He was accommodating .one most important thing that even the American media ignored it is the fact that John Mccain did not made any eye contact with Barak Obama while debating, on the other hand Barak Obama was not only looked convincing but also calm and poised in the first presidential debate. Let us hope that president Barak Obama will bring positive ramifications in this Global village and readily provide relief for American consumers who have been sneezing so that rest of the world can breathe. So one last time Go Barry Go…….

Posted On 11/2/2008 5:41:22 PM
Hrishabh Said:


Where is the other side of the coin (counter-view) ??

Posted On 11/6/2008 12:57:02 PM