Logwritten
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2009 2:35 PM IST

New York: Car maker General Motors has been telling officials in Washington that a bankruptcy filing by the company maker would unleash unintended consequences that could cripple the country’s industrial base, a media report says.

“General Motors Corp, hoping to sway the battle in Washington over an auto-industry bailout, has begun telling federal officials that a bankruptcy filing by the car maker would set off a chain reaction hammering hundreds of suppliers and dealers - and in turn the company’s Detroit rivals,” the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday.

Quoting people familiar with the situation, WSJ said “GM is holding meetings this weekend with US Congressional leaders, the Bush White House and members of the Obama transition team.”

Some of the GM board members including Erskine Bowles, Phil Laskawy, John Bryant, Armando Codina are pitching in on the lobbying effort, WSJ said.

“Part of GM’s premise is that a bankruptcy would threaten both jobs and the health of the government’s pension-benefit insurance arm, which covers millions of workers not in the auto industry,” the newspaper said.

Auto-related industries employ 3.1 million people around the country, encompassing everything from car-seat makers to auto dealers to auto-parts stores. GM itself employs 1,23,000 in North America and does business with thousands of North America suppliers.

Meanwhile, another person close to GM has told the WSJ that executives recently told GM’s board they are “increasingly optimistic” that GM will receive a liquidity injection before the end of the month.

To muster up support for the bailout, GM has also been sending letters to tens of thousands of dealers, supplier executives, employees and union members, the daily said.

Leading car makers like General Motors Corp, Ford Motor Co and Chrysler LLC are seeking an emergency infusion of cash, in order to survive the global financial turmoil.

On Friday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has signalled that he would move forward tomorrow with a bill giving the industry access to the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), the daily added.

TARP was set up by the government in October to help ailing banks and other financial firms.

However, the Bush administration and many Senate Republicans oppose giving auto makers access to TARP. Instead, last Friday President Bush had urged Congress to speed up the release of $ 25 billion in already-approved loans to the auto industry, the report added.

Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Jay Said:


In 1973, a demoralised and beaten John Z DeLorean resigned from General Motors. A group of GM management bullies, jealous of his successes in life and business had beaten him. DeLorean had played a huge role in taking Pontiac to #3 in the car business for nearly a decade, invented the muscle car and the personal luxury car. He was also married to a supermodel, had a wonderful family and was not afraid to take GM in to the futurte. In fact, DeLorean was the heir apparent to be the CEO of GM when this cadre successfully ostracised the young exec., placing him in an office on GM's old 14th Floor with meaningless assignments designed to make him either comply, or leave. When DeLorean took over as General Manager of Chevrolet in 1969, he had been expounding the need for GM to take a higher level of corporate responsibility by building safer and more economical cars. He had indeed lived the nightmare of the Ralph Nader years and saw that the US auto indusctry was not sustainable. However, in 1969 gas was 35 cents a gallon, most cars got less than 10 mpg, and GM market share was nearly 50%. DeLorean's ultimate crime was that corporate responsibility just didn't sell. Few could have predicted the Arab oil embargoes and no one could have ever predicted that John Z. DeLorean would be GM's last shining hope for a future. We know now, 35 years later that GM never really learned the lesson of corporate responsibility. Disciples of those people who threw DeLorean out of GM for preaching safety and fuel economy in the late '60s carried on through three generations of corporate management. Today, we are hearing the corporate grandchildren of those nasty people saying that indeed, they should still be running GM. In fact, they are threatening the economic viability of the entire country if we do not give it to them right now! Doubt me, or want to know more? Go read the first 12 pages of DeLorean's book... he wrote it in 1973.

Posted On 11/17/2008 12:28:19 PM
Re: Mary Said:


Interesting Jay. What is the name of his book?

Posted On 11/17/2008 7:36:54 PM
Re: Dan Said:


Delorean's self serving, 35 year old book can not be relied on to explain GM's current plight shared by the entire auto industry. This industry is a cornerstone of our economy, providing direct or indirect employment to nearly 3 million of our friends and neighbors everywhere! It is a highly valuable national security asset with its intellectual and R & D capability, as well as its support of key industries such as tool & die, and steel making. The business is burning immense quantities of cash reserves in this market collapse brought on by the global financial crisis. For the U.S. makers, it is a perfect storm on top of the collapse in truck & SUV sales due to the $4 gas spike and already dramatic recession in global vehicle sales. GM's turnaround plan has been working. US makers, and GM in particular, have been releasing exceptionally competitive products to rave reviews. GM is leading in technological advancement with the planned production of the Chevrolet Volt & Cruze and offers excellent fuel economy and quality rivaling or exceeding the world's best. Recently won union contracts will allow profitable production of smaller cars in addition to trucks and SUV's, by 2010, enabling a return to profitability with even modest market recovery. The US makers desperately need bridge loans to protect against an industry collapse in this unprecedented time. Like the government guarenteed Chrysler loans, which were paid off ahead of schedule, such loans will very likely not cost the American taxpayer a dime. Conversely,failure of even one of the auto companies will bring down all of them due to the interconnected nature of suppliers in the already beleaguered industry. Lost US tax revenue would quickly dwarf the potential loan amounts at risk, in addition to the devastation of may communities and several entire states. -Just retired 40 year GM engineer

Posted On 11/17/2008 9:44:57 PM
Joe Said:


GM 's sudden stewardship of the environment is simply a way to continue to make gas guzzlers thanks to E85 an extremely inefficient fuel. The CAFE standards call for all car companies to achieve an average MPG for all vehicles. I believe the most recent number is 27 MPG. Well if you make the biggest money off of 10 miles per gallon SUV's you would hate to say good bye to them wouldn't you? The CAFE standards has a loophole, that being that an E85 vehicle operating on E85 miles per gallon are ONLY figured against the actual amount of gasoline in the blend (15%) if you divide 100% fuel by 15% gasoline you get the multiplier to the mpg (666) therefore a gas guzzling 10 MPG SUV is given credit for 66.6 MPG. If you sell one SUV like this you can have 5 vehicles only achieving 20 MPG and this gas guzzling SUV and you average more than 27 MPG overall while not one of their vehicles really met the standard. GM is not the only one taking advantage of this free ride Ford and Chrysler are too. The big three are heading down the toilet and this is just their hands clinging to the rim.

Posted On 11/17/2008 5:02:38 PM
Rod Said:


Some truths there.... but we all know, only too well, what became of John Delorean... who talked the Irish into huge grants to build a delightful looking, but impractical stainless steel 2 door coupe...which the world needed like a hole in the head.... and then, having 'blown' the money... spent some time in custody on drug related charges.... or are we talking about 2 different people here????

Posted On 11/17/2008 6:13:08 PM
Philip Said:


The decision makers have refused to manufacture quality autos that consumers want to purchase; they have been concerned with making a buck in the short run and not looking beyond their noses. Lexus, Mercedes, BMW and now even Subaru have made an enormous impact in this country; Why keep the top executives when they have made such bad decisions over the years. I realize a bailout maybe necessary, but require new blood and control over executive salaries; require the production of Green and fuel efficient autos as a requirement for bailout.

Posted On 11/17/2008 10:10:26 PM
CAB Said:


The best thing would be to allow GM to file for Chapter 11 (re-organisation) before it is forced into Chapter 7 - (total liquidation). If the present disaster is allowed to continue, and vested interests amongt unions, management, and local politicians are allowed to control what happens, GM will eventually bring down the US economy. The good bits that are left will become slaves to a new kind of socialism under a new kind of President. Pensions and health care arrangements are at the bottom of GM`s problems, and there is no hope of a competitive solution whilst these overheads remain. It`s a no-brainer — the only problem is admitting it. Like Pan American, the problem is ultimately bad management. Why not let the Japanese (or, better the Koreans) manage auto production in the US? They are good at it, the US no longer is. I`m a Brit - we`ve been there - it works. Once we got rid of the unproductive ancient plants and restrictive practices our economy began to recover - OK it`s not the most shining example, but a heck of a lot better than it might have been. GM has some advantages if it chooses to downsize - not least real estate, all those redundant auto plants have geat development value. Think Union Pacific. How many times has that icon (and it`s constituent parts) gone broke? But those old land grants make it the biggest landowner in the US after the BLM Andrew Sanders

Posted On 11/17/2008 11:28:18 PM
Jay Said:


For those of you who still think DeLorean was a self-serving person, read on: The irony of the DeLorean legacy at GM and his book "On A Clear Day You Can See General Motors" authored by by J. Patrick Wright is that DeLorean sued to block the book's publication. He was successful until 1979, whereby he won the right to edit the manuscript and the first edition was published. The reason? While writing the book in 1973-74, he had decided to start DeLorean Motor Company, and knew that a tell-all book on a would-be competitor would not serve that purpose. Doubt me? Check the records available via Wiki and other sources. The book, written in 1973-74 was a big hit even in 1979. The names and faces have changed, but GM has not.

Posted On 11/18/2008 1:06:34 AM
Dave Said:


Bad idea, Number one, GM was in trouble before the financial crisis got, they have been reporting losses for the last couple years. it was just a meter on time falling into bankruptcy, just because they are a big union government, with fat salary.., also not to forget their produces & quality & gas sufficient are way below Toyota or Honda, number 2, nothing will help since the stop leasing and financing completely, this company will never be The big GM again, I guarantee in 2 years the will have the same problem.

Posted On 11/18/2008 1:56:10 AM
Ray Said:


Most of the people in this country DON'T have pensions, don't have platinum healthcare coverage and don't have the wages of these UAW workers. When you plead for the taxpayer to guarantee these jobs, pensions and healthcare coverage, you are asking the HAVE-NOTS to take care of the HAVES. Is anyone gonna replace people's 45% losses on their 401k's like the Pension Benefit Guaranty Fund is going to take care of these private UAW employees? What makes these private citizens more worthy than the rest of us? Government is discriminating when it takes care of one group to the detriment of the rest. Either that, or put ALL of us on the dole.

Posted On 11/18/2008 3:08:32 AM