Logwritten
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2009 3:37 PM IST

New Delhi: Union finance ministry has rejected a tourism ministry proposal to subsidize private companies building one-three-star category hotels.

“We have been asked to reformulate our package and send a fresh proposal to the expenditure finance committee (EFC). This is a major set back as the country lacks over 100,000 budget hotels,” says a senior official at tourism ministry who declined to be named. “This is when we helped creation of 2,000 budget hotel rooms in 2007-08 by extending capital subsidy.”

No incentives: Hotel Alka, a budget hotel in New Delhi. The tourism ministry says India needs 110,000 hotel rooms in the budget category. Harikrishna Katragadda / Mint

No incentives: Hotel Alka, a budget hotel in New Delhi. The tourism ministry says India needs 110,000 hotel rooms in the budget category. Harikrishna Katragadda / Mint

The committee, a part of the finance ministry, approves allocation of money for government projects.

The tourism ministry had proposed an incentive for a new one-star hotel at Rs2 lakh per room, subject to a cap of Rs30 lakh for the hotel, Rs3 lakh per room for a two-star facility subject to a cap of Rs75 lakh for the hotel and Rs3 lakh per room with an upper limit of Rs1 crore for a three-star hotel.

“The package was a combination of capital subsidy (or a grant) and loans from the bank, which ever will be lower, Now that our proposal has been turned down we are not expecting any money coming for this project in 2008-09”, said the same official.

The rejection comes even as the 11th Plan has envisaged a central assistance of Rs235 crore as an incentive to develop accommodation-infrastructure. According to the ministry of tourism there is a shortage of 150,000 hotel rooms in the country. Of this 110,000 rooms will be required in the budget category.

“The proposal was rejected in the EFC meeting on Monday as it was not properly structured. A 10% or 15% subsidy in a hotel project such as this will not lead anywhere. It will not take off. What you need is land,” a senior government official in the know of the development but who declined to be named, said.

He also added there have not been too many takers for such kind of subsidies during the 10th Plan period (2002-007).

Those in the business of budget hotels agree.

“The bureaucracy is so terrible that there is a big difference between practice and intent,” said Patu Keswani, chairman and managing director Krizm Hotels Pvt. Ltd, which runs 10 budget hotels under the Lemon Tree brand and is developing another nine under the Red Fox brand. “It doesn’t make much of a difference because if I am building a 100-room hotel at a cost of Rs40 lakh per room, then I am spending Rs40 crore; but the cap of Rs75 lakh per hotel is less than 2% of my cost. I think if the government would provide an interest rate subsidy, that would help more.”

Akshay Kulkarni, directorSouth Asia, Cushman and Wakefield, a real estate consulting firm, says that although the idea of providing subsidy to budget hotels is good, even implementation sometimes can be a problem as well.

Tourism contributes $6 billion (Rs28,380 crore) in foreign exchange earnings to India, according to data from the ministry of tourism, and the first half of the year saw 2.72 million foreign tourist arrivals, up 11.1% over the same period last year. However, tour operators are expecting a 15-30% fall in tourist arrivals after the Mumbai terror attack and due to economic slowdown.

sangeeta.s@livemint.com

Rahul Chandran contributed to this story.

READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Shijo Said:


I think this is a classic example of Good intentions leading all the way to hell. Many of our ministries and business have great ideas and plans which dont see the light of the day. And all that happens due to one simple reason, the plans have not been thought through in financial terms. As correctly pointed out a grant like the one mentioned above will only mean only 2% of a good hotel (As mentioned in the case). So eventually if this plan does get implemented then it will go to those who least deserve it. In the corporate world we get such ideas when the fellow in question has a lot of budgets and no clue what to do with all that money. It appears the same with the tourism ministry. They dont seem to know what to do. If you really ask me as a ministry their job is to stimulate the demand and ensure that the guys who come to India do have a good experience. I must say that the incredible India campaign is one hell of a good job. It stands out compared to the other things that I see. However thats where the good things come to an end. Many of my friends from abroad are sold on the concept of India but when come to bangalore there is a rude shock. Its easier to buy a lonely planet and get some useful information than get something form the http://www.incredibleindia.org website. There are hundreds of fly by nite operators sitting in places like paharganj. And the way these guys are mushrooming I am only scared for the people who visit the real india. I read about some tourist who was charged Rs 10000 for a few samosas. I do understand that such things are difficult to police but at least we can provide information. Today if I want to go to europe I can make a plan and I can be sure that if I stick to it I wont overshoot my budget. But in India there are a hundred incidental expenses. Take for example if I go to europe I can get a eurorail, get discounted passes for budget hotels and access public transport and be rest assured that the food that I hav

Posted On 12/18/2008 10:44:04 AM
Shijo Said:


I do understand that such things are difficult to police but at least we can provide information. Today if I want to go to europe I can make a plan and I can be sure that if I stick to it I wont overshoot my budget. But in India there are a hundred incidental expenses. Take for example if I go to europe I can get a eurorail, get discounted passes for budget hotels and access public transport and be rest assured that the food that I have will not make me sick. Now lets look at a budget trip in india. As soon as I land I accosted by the taxi touts who charge a flat rate which I dont know whether is right or not. And then when he takes me to his favorite hotel the guy upsizes me according to the skin of my colour. Then I have to make sure that I dont drink water from taps marked "Drinking Water". I have to make sure that I eat only from designated places. Haggle with a thousand touts all around and by the time I end my visit I have had an incredible experience but surely I wouldnt have met my budgeted plans. I know that the tourism ministry cant take care of the infrastructural and behavioural problems of the country but they can create reliable information source that is free available without any copyright restrictions. What could be a better marketing tool than to provide a realistic picture of what is in store. Additionally they can create a coordination mechanism so that in case some tourist is troubled he calls up a central helpline and they issue is handled to his satisfaction. I do agree that my suggestions are classic drawing room debate points. But I seriously think that its better than the subsidy plan that these guys have come up with.

Posted On 12/18/2008 10:46:05 AM
SATISH Said:


SINCE I CAME TO KNOW THAT GOVERNMENT IS PLANNING TO GIVE SUBSIDY FOR STAR CATEGORY HOTELS UPPER LIMIT UPTO 1 CRORE FOR A 3 STAR HOTEL I STARTED WORKING ON MY DREAM HOTEL PROJECT BUT AFTERWARDS I CAME TO KNOW THAT THIS PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REJECTED MY DREAMS SHATTERED AND THIS ALL IS BECAUSE OF THIS SICK GOVERNMENT...................PEOPLE WHO WILL NEVER ALLOW INDIA TO PROSPER AND INDIA WILL ALWAYS REMAIN DEVELOPING COUNTRY...AFTER 100 YEARS ALSO WE WILL HEAR D SAME THING T6HAT INDIA IS STILL UNDER DEVELOPED JUST BECAUSE OF THESE POLITIANS WHO ONLY THINK OF THEMSELVES AND NOTHING FOR THE COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT .....JAI HO BHARAT SARKAR KI.

Posted On 5/22/2009 3:38:42 PM