Log has written
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2010

New York: Despite country facing worst economic downturn since great depression, Barack Obama’s inauguration will come with a hefty price tag estimating at more than $170 million, a media report said on Tuesday.

But there are plenty of rich donors willing to pick up the tab, ABC News said.

“They are not the $20 and $50 donors who helped propel Obama through Election Day,” Massie Ritsch, communications director for the Center for Responsive Politics, is quoted as saying. “These are people giving mostly $50,000 apiece. They tend to be corporate executives, celebrities, the elite of the elite.”

The biggest group of donors were none other than the recently bailed-out Wall Street executives and employees, Ritsch said. “The finance sector is well represented, despite its recent troubles. Those who worked in finance still managed to pull together nearly $7 million for the inauguration.”

The donors will get some of the best seats in the house for the inauguration, as well as admittance to some of the best balls and other events.

The actual swearing in ceremony will cost $1.24 million, ABC News reported, quoting spokeswoman for Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural ceremonies.

It’s the security, parties and countless rentals that really run up the bill, it added.

The federal government estimates that it will spend roughly $49 million on the inaugural weekend. Washington, DC And neighbouring states of Virginia and Maryland have requested another $75 million from the federal government to help pay for their share of police, fire and medical services.

“We have a budget of roughly $45 million, maybe a little bit more,” Linda Douglass, spokeswoman for the inaugural committee. That’s more than the $42.3 million in private funds spent by President Bush’s committee in 2005 or the $33 million spent for Bill Clinton in 1993.

“The money is going toward providing events which we hope are going to connect people, make them feel like we are all in this together and reinforce the notion that when we pull together, we’re stronger,” Douglass said. “And we need to pull together to face the challenges that are before us today.”

Among the expenses: a Bruce Springsteen concert, the parade, large-screen TV rentals for all-free viewing on the national Mall, $700,000 to the Smithsonian Institution to stay open and, of course, the balls, including three that are being pitched as free or low cost for the public.

Besides Wall Street firms, a large chunk of the money came from employees at companies such as Microsoft, Google and DreamWorks Animation, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Microsoft CEO Steven Ballmer and his wife, Connie, each gave $50,000. So did Microsoft chairman and co-founder Bill Gates and his wife, Melinda, DreamWorks CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg and his wife, Marilyn, and filmmaker and DreamWorks co-founder Steven Spielberg and its employees gave a total of $275,000, ABC News reported. While, billionaire investor George Soros and his family contributed $250,000, and Google co-founder Larry Page and CEO Eric Schmidt each donated $25,000.

Despite all the donations, Obama’s team has made donations much more restrictive than in the past, it noted, saying Obama capped donations at $50,000 per person, compared to $250,000 cap President Bush had at his last inauguration.

With expectations soaring high, the US media has began speculating on the contents of the inaugural speech of Barack Obama, as the 44th President of the US, and said it would emphasis on “culture of responsibility”.

In fact, some key aides of Obama also began indicating the tone of the inaugural speech, which the people, political observers and analysts are expecting that would be a historic one, given his oratorical skills.

Quoting Obama’s advisor, The Washington Post said the inaugural speech will emphasize the themes of responsibility and restoring public confidence. CNN reported that this will emphasize on “Age of New Responsibilities”.

The New York Daily News reported that Obama will use his inaugural address to preach that tough times call for government responsibility, Wall Street accountability and individual sacrifice.

When asked about the inaugural speech, Rahm Emanuel said: “I think what you will hear is a time and a place in which we all have an era of responsibility, that too long there’s been a culture of anything goes, and that to do what we need to do as a country, to regain America’s greatness and continue to move forward and be an example around the world, that we need that culture of responsibility not just to be asked of the American people, but that its leaders must also lead by example.”

The Congressional Quarterly said all the memorable inaugural speeches, Lincoln, Roosevelt and Kennedy, have been delivered at the time of serious national crisis or in times when significant changes were taking place.

“With the first African-American taking the presidential oath of office during the worst economic circumstances in three-quarters of a century, both conditions are already satisfied,” it said.

Rahm Emanuel, the incoming chief of staff, told a television news channel that Obama in his speech would seek the culture of responsibility would be sought for American leaders as well as the population at large.

Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
T Said:


Interesting. 2 hours into his presidency and he's already spent $125 million more than was budgeted. I feel a reach for my wallet already.

Posted On 1/21/2009 12:14:53 AM
sparky Said:


"The federal government spent $115 million dollars for the 2005 inauguration. Keep in mind, that $115 million price tag was separate from the money Bush backers bundled to put on the inauguration festivities. For that, they raised $42 million. So the bottom line for Bush's 2005 inauguration, including the cost of security? That's right, $157 million."

Posted On 1/21/2009 3:40:46 AM
stephone Said:


Me being a 37 year old man and an american citizen, I think the fact that this being the first black president after having caucasion presidents for as long as I've been living, $170 mn is a small price to pay for 400+ years it took for us to have an african american for a president. I am not just saying this because he is an african american but because he has an ambition to run the country, and has a feasable plan. Obama deserves his just due and I have all the faith in the world that Obama will change this country for the better after all of the problems we experienced throughout the Bush years.

Posted On 1/21/2009 4:59:16 AM
Re: T Said:


Enough with the first black this and the first black that. There has never been an Italian President either and I've never heard anything said about that or anyone whine about it. Equality is in the eye of the beholder.

Posted On 1/21/2009 6:41:58 PM
stephone Said:


Me being a 37 year old man and an american citizen, I think the fact that this being the first black president after having caucasion presidents for as long as I've been living, $170 mn is a small price to pay for 400+ years it took for us to have an african american for a president. I am not just saying this because he is an african american but because he has an ambition to run the country, and has a feasable plan. Obama deserves his just due and I have all the faith in the world that Obama will change this country for the better after all of the problems we experienced throughout the Bush years.

Posted On 1/21/2009 4:59:16 AM
Re: Sara Said:


Booo on your "first black president" Geesh! He's half white. Again, there hasnt been a woman president either. Our country is a mess and he could have skipped on the dinner etc, clipped coupons like the rest of us and cut corners to prove a point. How come everyone claims "black" and he, himself says "mutt". So lets throw him a huge party? Better idea, skip it all and when the country turns around and we are back on track, than have a party?!

Posted On 1/21/2009 9:34:58 PM
Champ Said:


people I read your comments and it a crying shame that everyone knows money is the root to all evil and yet we let the fact of money blind us from the history that is behind this and not to mention all the money Bush has spent drove the world into a bugger hole than we already was inn that he drove the economy to 0. Now we are robbing Peter to pay Paul for. People never seen a $170 million dollars or ever even imagine on having a $170 million so it sound as if it is a great amount of money remember to those that are unfamiliar with this amount of money. That is peanut money compared to the trillion and beyond that, the government and people in this world has. for those that cant understand when you compare that $170 million to those type of numbers ask your self did he spend a lot of money to cover security in 3 states and some. THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX WHEN YOU SPEAK OF OUR PRESIDENT BECAUSE THIS IS DEFINITELY OUTSIDE THE BOX.

Posted On 1/22/2009 12:24:53 AM
Yveka Said:


Notice the article stated that private donors were paying the bulk of this. Remember all those celebrities who Love him. They definitely contributed. Also, Obama is not the one who came up with the balls. Its a traditional thing. Look it up before you bellyache. At least read the whole article.

Posted On 1/22/2009 12:26:19 AM
john Said:


I believe the better comparison would be not to the previous administration's inaugural cost, in that distant time and in a different economy, but to what might have been done today. What if Mr Obama had said that his wealthy friends can give all they want, no $50,000 limits needed, and all the money would then be given to Habitat for Humanity, or rebuilding New Orleans and Galveston, or better medical care for our Veterans, on and on...I have read that the temporary stage alone cost $5 million, and was used for one day. Some one made money there. What if Mr Obama had decided that he could stand just as well on the plain old solid ground, and then given that $5 million to feed the homeless? Or to alzheimers patients? Perhaps he would have stood even taller there, being level with the rest of us. Perhaps we could have seen him even more clearly. So much is said about celebrating this mans race, but it is his actions that will either truly be worth celebrating, or fail to be. He is the decider now, he is not trapped inside traditions unless he lets himself be. What would it be like to have a president, of any color, who decides that it is the people are what really matters, and not the pose? We have yet to see that.

Posted On 1/22/2009 10:51:28 PM