Log has written
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2010

Whenever the family travelled together, while most of us would admire the greenery, my father-in-law would sigh ecstatically over the beauty of the giant pylons striding across the fields. To him, they represented the engineering talent and achievements of the public sector, munificently straddling the commanding heights of the economy. He was also genuinely sorry to see an empty BTS bus pass by, and actually climbed on one once even though it took him in the wrong direction! “Why go by a small bumpy car, when such a big beautiful bus is waiting for you?” he would often ask, and lived by his credo almost till the end of his life.

Papa was not alone in his faith and belief in the public sector. For at least two decades after independence, the state in all its forms genuinely represented the aspirations of the people. Citizen expectations of the state were by and large managed with honesty and compassion, and resulted in much of the public infrastructure my generation has taken for granted.

Sadly, all that changed dramatically some time ago. We now have very good reason to be as cynical as we are about government. Along with our dwindling faith, the public sector role in the economy seems to have shrunk somewhat since liberalization began.

Still, events have cycled back to a point where some of the faithless are echoing my father-in-law, seeing again the potential beauty in the guiding hand of a benevolent state.

But too much has changed on the ground in the past four decades and it will not be easy to restore the state’s effectiveness.

Just in the past two weeks of travel, from the dusty villages of Bagepalli in Kolar district, to the grimy streets of municipal Kolkata, I have seen, all over again, just how callous and neglectful the state has become in the provisioning of public services, and how devastating is the impact of that on the most vulnerable.

Kolar, one of the most backward districts of Karnataka, also has the misfortune of having high fluoride content in its groundwater, which remains the primary source of drinking water for people.

All state measures to improve the situation appear to have failed. In one panchayat, a de-fluoridation plant lies abandoned, having worked for only two months. Nobody knows what to do with it. In a government primary school, a rainwater harvesting system is similarly broken.

In one particularly bizarre instance, the government has handed out rather neat looking fluoride filters, but with no instruction on how to replace the activated alumina that filters the fluoride. With the result that the water, which we tested, now has even more fluoride concentration than before.

On the streets of Kolkata, in a scorching sidewalk school run for homeless children, the situation is even more heart-rending, with a left-wing government long in power. There seems little hope of change anytime soon for the spunky kids who generously shared their morning meal of dry bread and channa (gram). The nearby feeder school is already overflowing and no new schools are coming up in the area.

As citizens, we need to deepen our introspection on this as much as our governments do. But there are two sectors that specially need to sharpen their analyses—the business sector and the voluntary sector.

Both sectors have rapidly filled the vacuum created by the faltering state. They have become incredibly powerful in the name of the citizen. And for just a while there, somewhere in the late 1990s perhaps, it seemed that a new balance of sarkaar, samaj and bazaar would actually create desirable change. I personally believe the promise still holds good to avoid excessive concentration of power, so long as we do not give up the responsibility of citizenship.

But recent events have reaffirmed that there is no substitute for the state in key areas of the economy, and for the universalization of essential public goods and services. There are just too many millions who lie below the scope of even the most “efficient” of markets, and beyond the reach of even the most “well-meaning” non-governmental organizations (NGOs).

As one political regime gives way to another, enlightened business and NGO leaders need to come together to enable the state as never before, instead of to merely supplement or replace it.

This is never going to be easy, given deeply polarized positions on the role of the state.

Yet, we can try hammering out some new Indian-style consensus, and get back to the original task of creating a functional state apparatus that can actually serve those citizens whom no one else can.

Hopefully then, like Papa, we will soon be able to pause on our journeys to admire shiny new solar roofs on our public schools.

Rohini Nilekani works with and supports many non-profit endeavours, especially in water, through Arghyam Foundation. Comment at uncommonground@livemint.com

Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
chandra Said:


Thanks Rohini Nilekani for musing on bring back of 'The State'. But it is not at all clear that first we need to understand what 'The State' can do and can not do probably never do for stable common goods for people. Essentially we need to debate and define the role of 'The State'-power, sensible responsibility, what to tax and not, etc. I do understand the on going debate on 'The State' role in peoples common goods in India.

Posted On 3/13/2009 10:42:27 AM
Vishal Said:


Nice article. Well, we all know how technically adept the Public Sector are, we can make that out from the tranformers in the middle of the roads. NGO's should also bring in the technical expertise to help out the state, I am sure they are doing that already. At volunteer level I am ready to pitch in bringing my skills on the table...it would be nice to know where I could help.

Posted On 3/13/2009 11:12:50 AM
nautami Said:


yes let us be positively believing in our government and that day will surely come when we will admire the development work which has effectively seeped to rural areas..that day will come slowly but surely

Posted On 3/13/2009 1:58:05 PM
Swami Said:


Have NGOs made any difference at all ? Vast sums of money are being raised every year in the name of one cause or the other. Who monitors them ? Who tracks the utility of money being spent ? Who governs whether the money is being spent for the cause it was originally raised for ? Who ensures that it isnt going into the pockets of some unscrupulous fund raiser. It seems pretty lucrative to do charity with other people's money.

Posted On 3/13/2009 2:00:42 PM
jayesh Said:


Contrary to the thought laid out,India's problem has been excess regulation and not de-regulation.Applying the same standards from the western world to India's is incorrect as India is just slowing down with the typical effects of monetary tightening from last year and a mild form of a credit freeze-it isnt a crisis of the magnitude that the west is seeing.Another point government has ended up spending minimal on infrastructure,less than 2% or so of GDP-pretty well known fact.The deficit is a good reflection of how good our state is.Best leave them out.Infact liberalization has put India on the map.

Posted On 3/13/2009 7:26:27 PM
swathi Said:


The problem today is ,right from the politicians to the common man,all of us have become self-centered, unmindful of the negative externalities we create. The rush to become the "best" and earn the most has driven us into exploitation. Every one is trapped in this viciousness,some succeed,others remain sufferers.

Posted On 3/15/2009 5:06:39 PM
Shyam Said:


Bringing the state back in is a crazy suggestion. Especially from people who have spend a better part of their lives in an India where you had a choice of 1 car, 1 tv,1 pathetic channel,1 job and a lakh applicants and these aren't stories from very long ago...but then again you had to experience it to appreciate the benefits of liberalization.

Posted On 3/15/2009 7:14:03 PM
j Said:


If the state is bought in that would be the end of private sector.the management then would not be able to pay themselves and their families huge stock grants.that is a good thing, then the employees who work, literally, 24x7 might see some of these payouts.so maybe it is a very good idea to bring the state in.i am not if the author still agrees

Posted On 3/17/2009 3:12:59 AM
rajender Said:


BECAUSE THERE ARE VERY FEW PEOPLE IN LEADERS TO SHOW THE CHARACTER THE MASSES BECAME LESS AND LESS SINCERE TOWARDS COMMUNITY THE STATE FUNCTION THROUGH PEOPLE AND MORAL LESS GREEDY PEOPLE ARE BOON TO ANY SYSTEM

Posted On 3/17/2009 7:21:30 AM
Ray Said:


Nostalgia is the enemy of logical thinking. And nostalgia is what prompts and afflicts Rohini Nilekani as she exhorts, the way she states it in her column, why the 'state must be brought back in'. When Rohini says, 'There are just too many millions below the scope of ‘efficient’ markets and beyond the reach of most NGOs', and so the state must be the answer, she conveniently forgets the multiple messes the state leads us into, under the garb of social justice. Let it known, government's never the solution, its the problem. If you don't believe me, look at the housing mess in the US, brought about governmental intervention, in providing for 'affordable housing'. Listen to Thomas Sowell's explanation, 'Like most wonderful-sounding political slogans, none of these lofty goals was discussed in terms of that one four-letter word that people do not use in polite political society— "cost." No one asked how many hundreds of thousands of dollars would be added to the cost of an average home by "open space" laws, for example. Yet empirical studies have shown that land-use restrictions added at least a hundred thousand dollars to the average home price in dozens of places around the country... In other words, where the problem was real, local politicians were the cause. National politicians then tried to depict this as a national problem that they would solve. How would they solve it? By pressuring banks and other lenders to lower their requirements for making mortgage loans, so that more people could buy houses. The Department of Housing and Urban Development gave the government-sponsored enterprise Fannie Mae quotas for how many mortgages it should buy that were made out for people for low to moderate incomes. Like most political "solutions," the solution to the affordable housing "problem" took little or no account of the wider repercussions this would entail. Nostalgia is good on screen. In real life,its a recipe for disaster.

Posted On 3/17/2009 11:37:26 AM