Log has written
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009

New Delhi: The Planning Commission has said India must set up more hydropower projects in the North East on rivers originating in China to counter Beijing’s plan to divert water from them.

“We should really develop our hydel resources as quickly as possible, particularly in the North East,” said Kirit Parikh, member, energy, at the Planning Commission. “Unless we establish a certain degree of prior use claim, China might say that as you are not using the water, why are you complaining?”

“A broad strategic vision is required,” Parikh added.

New Delhi is concerned about Beijing’s plan to divert water from rivers that flow into the Brahmaputra to the arid zones of Xinjiang and Gansu, through its ambitious $62 billion South-North Water Diversion Scheme.

“According to international laws, there is a question of having a prior user commitment, which gives a certain amount of right. We need water from all the rivers which are fed off from tributaries from there (China),” Parikh added.

A senior official in the ministry of water resources, who did not want to be identified, said: “We are trying to address this. We are discussing how to go about it diplomatically. And we have to establish our rights.”

The Chinese embassy in New Delhi did not reply to email queries from Mint on the issue.

The North East has a hydropower generation potential of about 58,000MW . Of the seven northeastern states, Arunachal Pradesh alone has a potential of 50,328MW—the highest in the country, according to the Central Electricity Authority (CEA) the country’s apex power sector planning body.

“We have to work with the state governments to develop these projects,” said a senior official at the Union power ministry, requesting anonymity.

Hydropower projects are, however, difficult to build as construction requires more specialized technology and design compared with thermal power projects. They also have to deal with delays in environmental clearances. A power sector review panel headed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had earlier said that a “long time was being taken for environment and forest clearances and there was a need to shorten the time frame for grant of the clearance”.

The relocation and resettlement of affected people is another issue which has thwarted many projects. A case in point is NHPC Ltd’s 3,000MW Dibang hydropower project in Arunachal Pradesh. The foundation stone for the project was laid in January 2008, but the public hearing, required by law before an environmental impact assessment report is prepared, couldn’t be held due to local opposition.

“It is true that action has to be taken. We have to keep in view the international laws and ramifications. There is an urgency in developing storage projects in the North East in a sustainable manner by taking into account the environmental and social impacts in the long run,” said K. Ramanathan, distinguished fellow at The Energy and Resources Institute.

The government is worried that the share of hydropower segment in India’s power generation basket has fallen from 40% to 25% in the past 20 years. The hydropower sector accounts for only 32,000MW of the country’s 147,000MW power generating capacity. The country, which has an installed hydropower capacity of 32,326MW, plans to add another 16,501.17MW by 2012.

Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Himanshu Said:


The report "Plan panel for more hydropower projects to pre-empt China" is an example of inaccurate and misleading reporting. To illustrate: * The report says the installed hydropower capacity in India is 32000 MW. This is wrong. The installed capacity is over 38000 MW as the figures from CEA. * This 40% hydropower capacity requirement mentioned in the report has no basis. Why the report (and many others) is uncritically repeating this. We have been for years asking what is the basis for it? Even the joint secretary Hydro, at a PowerLine conference on January 15 2009 publicly said that this not some god given norm, it has to be rooted in the reality of the power consumption patterns. * The issue of resistence to Dibang project needs to seen in correct perspective. The report, strangely says that the PM laid foundation stone in January 2008, and hence suggesting that the project should have gone ahead!! Why did the PM, who also holds the environment portfolio, lay the foundation stone for a project for which neither proper EIA has been done, nor public hearing has happened, and no environment clearnace is given. No prior informed consent of the affected people has been taken. The project lacks even justification on many counts. Your report, by citing the PM laying the foundation stone as if it has some sacred value, implies that the nation must adhere to that date, actually demeans and insults so many of the statotary, social and democratic requirements. * The bogey of the delays in the environment clearances is also barking at the wrong tree. In fact, even projects that have got clearances have been delayed for ages, as research shows, because of inadequate social, technical and environment appraisals. In any case, responsible media should stop raising this, because we better be well informed about the consequences of the projects, rather than push them, without even knowing the consequences. We expect better reporting from MINT. Himanshu

Posted On 3/22/2009 6:29:11 AM