Log has written
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2009

New Delhi: The drugs controller general of India (DCGI) has revoked the permission granted to Mumbai-based Shreya Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd to import anti-diabetes drug Oral Recosulin, made by Canada-based Generex Biotechnology Corp., after a Mint investigation revealed that the product had been given marketing approval in India without any local human clinical trials being conducted as required by the country’s drug laws.

A letter to this effect, issued by DCGI on 26 March with a copy to drug controllers at ports across the country, has been reviewed by Mint. In the letter, the drugs controller has asked Shreya to provide details of the quantity of the drug imported and, in case these were being used for a post-marketing study or a sort of clinical trial after the product has been launched, the status of this study.

Also See Tough Treatment (PDF)

DCGI has also suspended sale of the drug and launched an investigation into the marketing approval granted to both Generex and Shreya.

When contacted, Ram Shelat, director (domestic business), Shreya Life Sciences declined comment, saying only that the company is reviewing the paper.

Also Read New diabetes drug approved without trial

The company had received permission to import 10 million packs of Oral Recosulin, each of which was being sold in India for Rs2,400. Oral Recosulin is insulin that is administered locally and not injected. It is categorized as a new drug in India because it uses a new delivery mechanism.

The Drugs and Cosmetic Act of India makes it mandatory for a new drug undergo so called phase III human clinical trials in India before being approved for marketing here. An exception can be made only if it is in public interest and based on data available from other countries.

“The company can no longer import this product into India and whatever has been imported has been put on hold with immediate effect. This means that packs of the product can’t be distributed in the market any more and what is already available has to be withdrawn,” said a senior health ministry official familiar with the issue who spoke on condition of anonymity.

He added that DCGI would investigate the matter and then decide if the company should be allowed to go ahead with the post-marketing study or if the permission to import the drug should be cancelled and it be asked to conduct a clinical trial.

The import permission was granted in 2007 to Generex Biotechnology, and later transferred to Shreya Life Sciences. It was restricted to 10 million packs. Usually, such import permissions have no restrictions on quantity of the drug being imported. Shreya, however, was to conduct the post-marketing study and submit a report to the regulator.

“Now this permission will further be acted upon after the DCGI receives and studies the post-marketing data submitted by the company,” said the same official.

On 26 March, Mint had reported that the marketing approval given for Oral Recosulin by DCGI highlighted a lapse in the regulatory mechanism as no clinical trials were conducted in India before the drug was launched.

Before it was granted approval in India, this anti-diabetes drug was being sold only in one other country, Ecuador, which has no drugs regulator.

Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
RJ Said:


"The drugs controller general of India (DCGI) has revoked the permission granted to / after a Mint investigation..." The first Mint article on this topic was rife with errors. If the DCGI reverses a prior marketing decision based on a poorly researched opinion piece then it would further erode the credibilty of India's beauracratic regulatory agencies. "Before it was granted approval in India, this anti-diabetes drug was being sold only in one other country, Ecuador, which has no drugs regulator." That would be news to Ecuadorian Minister of Health, Caroline Chang. "The Drugs and Cosmetic Act of India makes it mandatory for a new drug undergo so called phase III human clinical trials in India before being approved for marketing here. An exception can be made only if it is in public interest and based on data available from other countries." The data does not come from sales of foreign countries, but from clinical trials. These articles keep mentioning Ecuador, while overlooking the trials in the US, Canada, Italy, England and Israel. India is refered to as the diabetes capital of the world, and has inadequete health care to meet this growing epidemic. The DCGI should be working to serve those in his population that have both a propensity for developing the disease and for having a greater disdain for the injections. Far too many amputations in India are reported due to the powerfull hold diabetes has on its society. Instead of using new safe tools such as buccal insulin to help bring more diabetics to insulin treatment, the DCGI is making rash decisions as a result of questionable journalist reports. "health ministry official familiar with the issue who spoke on condition of anonymity." I think an investigation should center around the origin of this suspect investigation. Those suffering are the diabetics losing access to their buccal insulin. When the topic is serious and complex, fiction should never be allowed to mask fact.

Posted On 3/28/2009 7:25:53 AM
david Said:


this drug is insulin, it's already accepted worldwide. The rapid mist system is the same used for oral spray everywhere . When it's in the public interest a drug and system can be licensed and go to phase iv testing for review. What part of Diabetes in epidemic proportions and public interest don't you get. If you had done your research and reviewed the same documents and test the DCGI did in 2007 you may have realized why this type was approved. Insulin is insulin dummy and the oral spray system is approved. They were just not approved together but in public interested they were fast tracked. So my question is why now after 2 years and why even bother when all this information was available. Or is there another faction pushing you to do this?

Posted On 3/28/2009 7:43:50 AM
Larry Said:


"An exception can be made only if it is in public interest and based on data available from other countries." If an insulin product that has shown no adverse effects in 10 years is not in the public interest then I don't know what is. Diabetes is pandemic in India due to dietary and cultural factors and the rampant disdain of injections. The DCGI had a solid rationale to approve Oral Recosulin back in November of 2007. Now they appear to be embarrassed and are shifting to "face saving" mode. The whole debacle will blow over in short order and Oral Recosulin will retain its approved status. The greater public good must take precedence whenever there are exceptions created in rulemaking. And that's how this issue must be looked at.

Posted On 3/28/2009 4:55:44 PM
Re: Jim Said:


You call yourself a journalist? What these two articles reek of, is paid partisan politics, (by a competitor) misinformation and biased reporting, or purposely, a lack of. You call yourself a journalist? What these two articles reek of, is paid partisan politics, (by a competitor) misinformation and biased reporting, or purposely, a lack of. You didn't contact Generex or even try to. You stated sales are halted and that's a LIE. They are not. You claim an unnamed Government source gave you this inside information which is pure crap. If the DCGI halted sales, why would they hide, where's a link to their site with this document? Where are ANY facts supporting all of your claims? Your articles are riddled with misinformation or lack of information and zero investigative knowledge about Generex / Shreya or their products. The approval process in India started 16 months ago, was launched in Nov 2008 and pricing and approval in Jan 2009. Your alleged concern over the "Indian people" is contradictory at best. You had 16 months to voice your concerns for "your people" and did nothing. It wasn't until sales started rolling in that your concerns for your people came to light. Maybe you should share with us what your true motives are, as it's obviously not based on a care or concern for the 40 Million Diabetics in your country. Yes the ones that are losing limbs everyday, going blind, heart attacks, etc. I'm sure those Diabetics and their family’s are proud of the fact that you're watching their backs...trying to stop a product that will help them manage this disease. How honorable of you. Sleep well. Jim

Posted On 3/29/2009 7:43:46 PM
l Said:


I find your attempt to create doubt in the minds of not only "your people" but all people about the efficacy of Resco-lyn reprehensible. It makes it clear to me that Oral-lyn will be a major player in improving the lives of diabetics world wide. Why else would you create ba lie. Oral-lyn will create a paradigm shift in the treatment of T1 &T2 diabetities as well as the prevention of childhood onset diabeties. You and whatever biotech/pharma company put you up to this represent everything that is wrong in our free market societies today. You let greed overshadow benefit at the expense of your fellow man.

Posted On 3/29/2009 8:31:48 PM
daniel Said:


I have a few questions about the research in this article. First you say Dr.Venkateswarlu who was the DCGI at the time of approval states . A drug like this requires Phase lll testing in India and he remembers the import for marketing being for phase lll only. YET the release of the approval by the company says this. "Indian approval was granted after a long and intensive review of the Generex Oral-lyn dossier by the Drugs Controller General (India) office. Indian government approved Generex Oral-lyn only after Generex submitted satisfactory responses to a series of regulatory interrogatories." Now why didn't you go to the ministry and get copies of his approval and all the interrogatories and put the reasons for the approval in your story. The only answer I can come up with is you had a preconcieved way you wanted the story to appear and it was easy to say I made a phone cal and hey didnt call back. Seems you could have gotten in touch with Generex directly and asked for information but you didn't. You wrote a completely one sided arbitrary article. Ask yourself this if the DCGI did intensive review which is also listed by the company when it issued it's statement then how is he saying something that is contrary to how it's being imported and marketed. Was his opinion final or did it go before a council who decided due to the epidemic of diabetes it was allowed to come in. This whole article seems under researched from the get go.

Posted On 3/29/2009 11:16:14 PM
Marco Said:


If you had studied some fundamentals of medicine for a few years you'd never have published such nonsense. How old are you? 15? Because this is not a sandbox - I hope the Mint will be held liable for this journalistic fiasco.

Posted On 3/29/2009 11:57:25 PM
mike Said:


Printing facts? without research, I thought that was covered in journalism 101? This article is a shame, knowing the number of diabetics in India and through out the world. This article is not the way to a long lasting career in journalism

Posted On 3/30/2009 12:27:57 AM
RJ Said:


"The drugs controller general of India (DCGI) has revoked the permission granted to Mumbai-based Shreya Life Sciences / to import anti-diabetes drug Oral Recosulin/ A letter to this effect, issued by DCGI on 26 March with a copy to drug controllers at ports across the country, has been reviewed by Mint." I researched all of what you refer to as DCGI documents, and what are normaly refered to as CDSCO documents, and can not find any official letter to document your claim that sales "have been halted" as of the date of this publication. One week has transpired since this claim that which been officially disputed. Please provide evidence of the documentation, unless it was given by illegal means? Or perhaps the claim has since been proven erroneous in some of the more outlandish regards? Specific action has been mentioned as fact, and this should not be overlooked by those researching the origin of the story.

Posted On 4/5/2009 9:31:55 AM
Re: Radhieka Said:


This is just to let you know that the DCGI or the CDSCO office, unlike the FDA or Health Canada, do not have a system of uploading letters, warning letters or recalls on their website. This is not a claim. It is a fact, which is why no clarification has been issued in this regard.

Posted On 4/6/2009 7:49:15 PM
Michael Said:


So if they don't send out letter or warning as you say, then who is your source? Funny, I contacted Apollo Pharmacy and they are selling it.

Posted On 4/7/2009 4:51:53 PM
Rajkumar Said:


Question for Radheyca. What affiliation do you have, and or if any contacts with anyone affilated with BIOCON Pharmacy in India? I do have contacts with representatives in India who knows you. I believe that the truth shall come out on your Article. I also do have contacts in DCGI and is well aware that your Article is asking questions and making a claim that is unwarranted. I believe that your answers to what you Claim is, will come through in a short few days. I am also considering doing an Investigation into your motives of writing this Article.

Posted On 4/9/2009 10:35:52 PM
Adam Said:


Still waiting for the follow up article. Shreya has resumed marketing (see oralrecosulin.com), so I'm guessing this was overblown and it's over.

Posted On 5/28/2009 5:13:52 PM
Rajkumar Said:


In reference to my postings to Radheyca, I have confirmed that sales of Oral Recossilin are being sold in Bangalore, Delhi, and Mumbai. I have telephonic verification that I can order and can receive this product in a couple of days. I have alao contacted Hospitals and they can verify that Doctors sre reccommending it to patients. I am very happy to hear that sales of this product have never been halted as per message from this Article and me veryfing it through Doctors and Institutions from India. Thanks again Raj.

Posted On 6/18/2009 2:55:32 AM