Log has written
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2009

Sure, it could have been election-time rhetoric, but Samajwadi Party chief Mulayam Singh Yadav’s grievances against the use of the English language and English-medium education—both real and imagined—touch a chord. Last week, Yadav said that if his party won, it would abolish ‘expensive education in English’. He is against ‘the compulsory use of English language in education, administration and the judiciary’. Does learning and working in English mean we neglect regional languages and literature? It’s an old debate—do we make a ‘foreign’ language, alien to most Indians, our nation’s lingua franca? We asked the experts. Edited excerpts:

Mahesh Elkunchwar

Marathi playwright, Nagpur

By excluding English, we would be shutting the doors on vast resources of language, literature and knowledge. And, like it or not, it has become India’s link language.

Illustration by Jayachandran / Mint

Illustration by Jayachandran / Mint

I have taught English in college for 35 years and the problem is that our system of education is bad and we don’t have good teachers. I came from a small village to Nagpur as an 18-year-old and used to pronounce “chaos” as “chay-os” because that is how my teacher pronounced it.

It was around 1845 that Vishnu Shastri Chiplunkar, the first great essayist in Marathi, called English vaghiniche doodh or the tigress’ milk. It is only after we drank it that we realized we had to be independent. Chiplunkar, incidentally, insisted that he would write only in Marathi, but also said that we should learn English to acquire knowledge.

I know people and families in Mumbai, Pune and Nagpur where both English and Marathi is spoken with great ease—not a word of Marathi is used when they speak English and vice-versa. This attitude—don’t learn English— will only foster laziness; at this rate they’ll say you don’t have to know Marathi or Hindi to join the public services.

Sunil Gangopadhyay

Author, Kolkata

We can’t do without English because it is a global language that liberates us from the confines of regionalism. As a writer who has never thought of writing in any language other than Bengali, knowing English has enriched my work. I think in Bengali and express myself best in the language, but my fiction is better because of my exposure to English literature. And without English I would only be read in Bengal.

Yadav's statement rings hollow because he is talking about a ban that has already failed. In 1981, the Communist government in West Bengal (under Jyoti Basu) banned English in all government-run schools. Millions of Bengalis, who lacked the means to improve their plight anyway lost job opportunities to the middle-class youngsters who went to private schools and learnt English.

Raghu Dixit

Lead singer, The Raghu Dixit Project, Bangalore

 
Howie Said:


I don't agree with this assessment and find it to be rather shortsighted-- and I'm an Indian-American who co-majored in English in college! I've worked for several years in India, and no, English is not in any way "the link language" in this country. I've worked in not only the Hindi belt and its environs (Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand and Chattisgarh mainly) but also in Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal. In most of these places, the vast, vast majority of people-- including educated office workers and engineers-- do not speak English to any reasonable degree of fluency, not even close. Furthermore, the most accurate calculations have shown fewer than 10 lakh native English-speakers in India-- that's even less than in non-English speaking countries like Germany or Brazil (which have higher numbers due to immigration from Britain/USA)! Adding to the complications, I've also been to places like Pondi where if anything, people are more likely to greet you in French. They even speak Portuguese on some regions of the West Coast. It's ridiculous to claim English as a "link language" in India when very few people speak it at all, let alone fluently. The one language I *did* find to be spoken throughout India was Hindi in one dialect or another (yes, even in a Tamilized form in Tamil Nadu), though for nationalistic reasons, it was often a "popular" (colloquial) Hindi from e.g. Bollywood rather than standard Hindi. Nevertheless, in practice, that's the link if we have one at all. Besides, when it comes to global languages, English has lost its prestige-- the Anglo-USA economic model just hasn't worked (I grew up in the USA, believe me I know!). So there's a shift underfoot in international languages. Undoubtedly Chinese will be a crucial one. But in addition to Chinese? Everyone's mentioning German these days due to EU and high-tech. (Also Spanish/Japanese to a lesser extent.) As a global tongue, that's where India should be redirecting.

Posted On 5/31/2009 9:32:01 AM