Log has written
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009

New York: Donning the role of a commander ill-equipped to save the Titanic of banking world, Citigroup’s India-born chief Vikram Pandit has found a place among the 20 worst ever CEOs in the American history, but the top honours has gone to bankrupt Lehman Brothers’ Dick Fuld.

The list of America’s 20 worst ever CEOs, compiled by business magazine Conde Nast Portfolio after consulting with a panel of business school professors, identifies the business “leaders who helped drive their companies into the ground.”

These 20 include “six men who helped make today’s economy stink”, the magazine said.

The list has been topped by Dick Fuld, under whose stewardship Lehman Brothers became the world’s biggest ever bankruptcy candidate and marked the epitome of the current global economic crisis.

Pandit has been ranked last at 20th position in the list, which also includes troubled insurer AIG’s Martin Sullivan and failed investment bank Merrill Lynch’s Stan O’Neal as also computer giant HP’s former chief Carly Fiorina, Enron’s former chief Ken Lay and bankrupt telecom firm WorldCom’s Bernie Ebbers.

About Pandit, the magazine said that he “did not create the mess Citi is in, but he is the financial services equivalent of the Titanic’s Edward Smith - a commander ill-equipped to save his ship.”

READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Venu Said:


I do not think it is wise to include Vikram Pandit in the list of worst. The simple reason being, the time frame for him vesus others at the helm is different. It's like already comparing Obama with Bush/Clinton/Reagan. That being said, does Pandit have everything available at his disposal to turn the situation around the answer probably is no at the moment owing to the macro-economic inter-dependencies.We also need a clear explanation on why the experts believe Pandit is ill-equipped and on what specific grounds? Meanwhile, does the list include Bernie Madoff and Sir Allen Stanford?

Posted On 4/23/2009 9:13:11 PM
James Said:


I think Pandit has to be on this list. Frankly he is ill equipped given his past experiences to run a company like Citigroup. Citi's leader needs to have a deep international experience of commercial and consumer banking - Vikram's core competence is in none of these areas - and he has made sure by hiring all Morgan Stanley alumni that he eliminates all the folks who did have the capability in the first place. Today Citi's consumer risk head is trader (!), thei cards head is a transaction services guy !!! I mean their really is no core competence at senior levels in the firm - and Vikram is the flag bearer of that approach. If u compare Citi's senior management to say JP Mprgan or HSBC today Citi leadership will come out looking extremely naive and ill informed about their respective areas of core competence, Vikram sucks - not because he is not trying hard enough - but just because he doesnt get it!!!!!

Posted On 7/14/2009 12:23:28 AM