Logwritten
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009 2:55 PM IST

Before you snigger at yet another tiger story, let me assure you that I understand your point. Yes, it is our national animal and yes, it is quite a sight even in the zoo. But in a country that is wracked by poverty, unemployment and terrorism, does the tiger deserve prime ministerial intervention?

No wonder you just don’t get this thing about the tiger.

The queen: Machhli, the famous tigress in Ranthambhore, has raised nine cubs in four litters. According to the latest national census, there are only 1,411 wild tigers left in India. Photograph: Jay Mazoomdaar

The queen: Machhli, the famous tigress in Ranthambhore, has raised nine cubs in four litters. According to the latest national census, there are only 1,411 wild tigers left in India. Photograph: Jay Mazoomdaar

The more compassionate among us might spare a thought for it were we not repelled by rabid environmentalists who seem to value all living beings except humans. But for most, the tiger does not make the cut. It does not even make a legal pet. Is there, then, a valid case for saving the tiger?

Years ago, I was with some children at the Dhikala Complex in Corbett National Park. When I asked why they were there, they told me they had come “to see a tiger”. Why tiger? “It’s so big and powerful…even elephants are scared of it…”

At this point, a proud father prompted his seven-year-old to say “We must save the tiger” and a few other children echoed the same thought. But when I asked them why they should do so, even the parents looked foxed.

Suddenly, a tiny girl threw up her hand and said in a sing-song voice: “…because it is the king of beasts”. With a few children protesting “nooo, that’s the lion”, the parents broke into indulgent laughter.

But I had my answer. This whole thing about the tiger is not about the tiger.

Though it is indeed the king of the Indian forests, having won the territorial battle with the Asiatic lion long ago, let us not meddle with traditional titles. What children understand as king of beasts is, in fact, the ecological equivalent of the apex predator or the animal at the top of a food pyramid. In that sense, both lions and tigers are kings.

Also Read Battle Cry (PDF)

Common sense tells us that to keep the top block in place, every block down the pyramid must be in place. So a healthy tiger population typically indicates that everything is fine with the rest of the forest. The same is true of the lion, but it can serve as an indicator only for Sasan Gir National Park, Gujarat. The tiger roams much of India’s best forests. So this thing about the tiger is really about the entire forest.

In talking to children, few can match Mumbai-based environmentalist Bittu Sahgal, who runs the Kids For Tigers campaign. Some of his ploys are dramatic. One of his routines is to call two children on stage (usually a boy with cropped hair and a girl with a thick mop). He asks them to bend over, then pours a glass of water on their heads. Then he takes out two white handkerchiefs to wipe their hair dry. He demonstrates how the handkerchief used by the boy gets less wet than the one used by the girl. It’s Sahgal’s way of telling children how forest cover is essential for our water security.

1  2 3 4 
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Jamaka Said:


As a member of Big Cat Rescue, I read with great interest and admiration your article above.referenced. Thank you for caring about, and advocating for, the tiger. Believing that ALL cats are magnificent and should be accorded respect and good treatment, I am heartened to see positive communications about them and hope other readers will be inspired to advocate for protection of the tiger as well. Respectfully, J N Petzak

Posted On 4/26/2009 12:54:52 AM