Logwritten
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 08, 2009 4:39 AM IST

LK Advani might become prime minister next month. What kind of a leader will he make? Let us examine his qualifications. Born in 1927 to a rich family living in a Parsi neighbourhood of Karachi, Advani is from the Amil caste of merchants. In his autobiography, My Country My Life, he tells us “as far as I can remember, I stood first in every class till matriculation” and “when I completed my matriculation, I had just turned 14”.

Post-mortem: Do you want him as PM? Amit Dave/Bloomberg

Post-mortem: Do you want him as PM? Amit Dave/Bloomberg

But at DG National College, Hyderabad, Sindh, he fails to get a degree in five years. His Lok Sabha résumé mentions an LLB from Bombay University, but does not say when he got it. His autobiography’s 986 pages do not mention this degree, or his attending this college, at all.

Forced out by Partition, Advani becomes an RSS worker. He spends years in Rajasthan’s villages, where he is “scared of one thing: tapeworm”.

This is because, over the years, he sees many people with the painful exit wound this worm would make on its way out from their legs. He writes about this at length, showing that his fear, for himself and perhaps also for the villagers he served, was real. But he does no research, else he would have learnt that it was not tapeworm but guinea worm.

On a visit to Chittor fort, he is “pained to see thousands of idols of Hindu deities broken and defaced by intolerant Muslim invaders”. Such experiences “were bringing about a strange transformation within me”.

Then, for seven years, till 1967, Advani is a journalist at the RSS journal Organiser, where he writes film reviews.

His writing is lazy and he leans on clichés and stock phrases. He describes a criminal as “dreaded gangster”. He uses too many adjectives and likes hyperbole. He calls Indira Gandhi’s Emergency the “darkest period in Indian history”, but then reports its years wrong in three places (pages 259, 266 and 270).

Also Read Aakar’s previous Lounge columns

I edited newspapers for 10 years and I can place Advani as a journalist immediately. He would not have risen beyond middle rank.

He says Dale Carnegie’s How To Win Friends And Influence People would “clearly rate as one of the five or six life-transforming books I have read so far”.

After a brief term in Delhi’s municipal council, because of his RSS connection, Advani is nominated to the Rajya Sabha. Jailed with other opposition leaders, Advani comes to power in 1977.

His life’s first executive job comes to him at 50 and he becomes minister of information and broadcasting.

This lasts two years.

In the 1980s, he finds his cause at Ayodhya. He begins a campaign, but does not understand the nature of India, and what his movement represents.

READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Renjith Said:


Sorry , No takers for this totally biased,prejudiced and misleading article.Many more we readers expecting,by the way it is an election year!!!

Posted On 4/24/2009 10:26:05 PM
Re: hardik Said:


Hi Renjith, Yes this is 'biased' opinion but not misleading one. Understand this - PINIONS are always subjective, whether we like it or not(coz they dont fit well with our prejudices)

Posted On 4/25/2009 1:38:38 PM
sam Said:


Take your point on Advani but the heir to Congress throne is not Dr. Singh either. Hopefully, one day Indians will look beyond the dynasties...Narsima Rao did a remarkable job but still everyone continues to belive that no one but Gandhis can rule India. All politicians in India are unfortunately equally incompetent, corrupt and mostly criminals.

Posted On 4/25/2009 5:36:31 AM
amity Said:


very important issues these are as a bachelor of economics and journalism i know the importance of (alternative of us dollars for Asian countries and something more important to do for developing countries to cope with trade deficit because of this currency. i always feel need of alternative currency against doller and that made specially for Asian countries ....... and if something like this ever happen. Mr Manmohan singh will be the only person who can do that . i never even terrified from people like Advani to be the prime minister of India. please save our country iam not any campaigner of any party but only thing is that Mr Manmohan singh is very very important for the development of our country.....

Posted On 4/25/2009 9:44:28 AM
shriram Said:


Dear Aakar, Seems your story is totally biased. You have not been able to understand that as a politician or as a common man, whether LKA should mention about economy in his biography. There may be some missing linkages in the book but that cannot become a judgement for a person or his leadership. Talk about MMS. Though you have talked about his studies, you have not analysed his last five year on TOP POST (Really!!! He will need permission for this from Sonia ji, Rahul ji, Priyanka ji, I don't know names of Priyank's son, Rahul is not married so those names would be added later)of Indian policitcs what was his track record. A economist supported by another strong finance background person for Finance. Economy was booming, was that NDA's action on which congress was getting the fruits, Agri Economy, one can not understand how people can take credit where they do not contribute... Inflation was moving up. FM as well as PM was not able to judge whether it is effects of Global economy and oil or liquidity in Indian system. Liquidity was squeezed when global economy was coming down. Ban on sugar export has started immediately before the drop in international prices. FM was shouhting on all industry leaders to drop prices without looking at its cost structure. On Terrorism, when attack on Mumbai happend (Congress was in power both at State as well as at Centre)these people are termed as responsible. Do some more study and write Column without getting biased, as it is media only which can presents facts and one should not twist for giving favors. Thanks.

Posted On 4/25/2009 9:59:22 AM
Re: Busy Said:


The NDA was reaping the benefits of the liberalisation of the economy by Dr.MMS..

Posted On 4/28/2009 5:08:02 PM
pramod Said:


You have hit nail on the head. Let us really know this person, supposedly an iron man leading a party of hate politics. We dont need people like these in power. I shiver of the day when these folks will be in power. His party in Karnataka condones women beating, and he sleeps for weeks without offering a comment. This is a party that shirks responsibility, whether they are in power or in opposition. They dont like to sit in the parliament, they dont want to govern, they dont take responsibility for their actions. I hope the voters in India sees thru their designs and vote with intelligence.

Posted On 4/25/2009 10:35:33 AM
Renuka Said:


I beg to disagree, any person with even the most basic education can see thru the facade of what and who Mr. Advani and his policies are, it's absolutely true in what the writer has expressed his view. As a senior manager in an MNC for the past 12 years, can confidently say that the elite, educated lot are all hands down for Mr. Manmohan Singh as the leader to lead India..... well wrote and throughly researched article...BRAVO!!!!!

Posted On 4/25/2009 11:09:15 AM
Jayesh Said:


Wonderful article!! I am not a supporter of Congress, neither oppose BJP, but what I expect from every INDIAN, is sheer respect for the GEMS of India. I expect that every Indian should be proud of our honourable Prime Minister and also Dr. Abul Kalam Azad. They are the true GEMS of India. This article serves as a straight lash to those who commit the mistake of comparing these two individuals. There cannot ever be any comparision!! India in 21st Century needs economic reforms and policies. It needs leaders that are well educated and intelligent enough. We need leaders who have clean intellactual background who can negotiate with International Leaders.

Posted On 4/25/2009 11:31:47 AM
Gopi Said:


Mr Patel, FT sent editors to a many leaders at sumit and ran those talks in its pages. World looking to Manmohan singh for solving its problems - LOL. Mr Patel says Singh knew at age 30 the harm Nehru's policies did but he continued to be a top advisor to regime that imposed worst economic polices EVER in our history (THE architect of DEFORM, if you will) some still haunting us. He did not walk away like person of integrity like Patel, Lakdawala, Minhas. He looked other way as Governor of RBI while banks were being looted in name of Rajiv Loan Mela. He was advocating statist policies as sec-gen of South South Commission just before he became architech of reforms. He is a life-long opportunist and serve who will do whatever is asked of him by his patrons. A Statesman editor has accused him of asking Chandrasekhar to backdate his aoppintment letter to IMF. He accused Left of treating him as bonded labour but now he says he cherished their alliance and ready to be in bed with them again. India can do without such men of straw.

Posted On 4/25/2009 1:57:58 PM
sur Said:


I was shocked when I first read this article in today's newspaper. I always held Mint in high regard but this is a utterly biased report! Whether you are pro bjp or not, you are a journalist and as a reader I do not expect to read such articles in a supposedly neutral newspaper. Have your personal opinions but if you want them published, do so in your own book.

Posted On 4/25/2009 2:44:24 PM
Himmat Said:


This article is not about opinions. If Mr. Advani fails to get his degree from DG National College, Hyderabad, Sindh even after 5, or where his Lok Sabha Resume mentions an LLB from Bombay University, but does not say when when he got it, nor does his autobiography of 986 pages mention this degree or his attending this college at all. Or his ignorance about Guinea Worm or the other facts mentioned. This is not an opinionated article but has facts. I am sure Mr. Advani like any man has some strengths too, only those are not highlighted in this article.

Posted On 4/25/2009 3:36:54 PM
Vijayendra Said:


A fitting reply to all of Advani's claim. All his BJP has given India is a paranoid religious majority.

Posted On 4/25/2009 5:00:38 PM
sur Said:


This is the most bigoted article I have read. This is not something you expect in Mint- maybe in TOI tabloids but not Mint. If the editors want him to publish his opinions, then let him do so in a book or his private blog. I do not read Mint for private biases.

Posted On 4/25/2009 8:03:50 PM
Kris Said:


This was an interesting article..I like Manmohan Singh and do think it was nice to have somebody like him as a PM and hope we do continue to have him as a PM.. But ranking him as a brutal tough man!!!! that was the first time I have seen that mentioned about him. Interesting view.. About Advani.. all I can say is that he could have been so different..but chose not to.. He speaks well, is intelligent but would have been better he hadn't focussed on fears and negativity.. There's a lot he could have learnt from Atal Vajpayee..

Posted On 4/25/2009 8:43:55 PM
DVader Said:


Surprising what passes off for journalism these days.....Ms Ramani's rabid penchant for all things "liberal" (sic) has resulted in this train-wreck of an article making to 'Lounge'. Its absolutely fine if Mr Patel is rooting for Manmohan Singh - its his right to choose who he sees fit.However he does a downright pathetic job in making a cogent argument to influence the reader as to *why* he arrived at this conclusion.After spending 3/4ths of the article foaming at the mouth and ranting about the monster-in-waiting (Advani) he spends the remaining lines painting a beatific halo over Manmohan Singh.With not even a shred of objectivity (don't even get me started on the literary abilities of Mr Patel - its a miracle he's in publishing)this piece is little better than the cheap,hopelessly biased speeches that two bit local politicians make during elections.I'll ask one simple question to Mr Patel (if he even bothers to check replies to his literary misadventures): If Mr Singh is such an accomplished & distinguished Economist - from Oxford no less - why is that we as a country are suffering from probably the worst recession in modern times ? Does that not speak volumes about his "Economic" capabilities much less his effete leadership capabilities (26/11 anybody?) But of course such questions would make your little head spin real fast which is perhaps why you neatly sidestepped them in your article(sic).Nevertheless good luck to you for your next tilt at the Windmills Mr Patel.And thank you Ms Ramani for maintaining such a fair and balanced set of viewpoints on Mint.

Posted On 4/25/2009 11:23:27 PM
SC Said:


Our Indian journalists mostly engaged only in negative thinking and futile discussion. Take for example TV news anchors mostly belonging to NDTV, IBN 7, CNN IBN,Times Now etc. What are the serious matters they are engaged in on TV channels. I have seen that on every channel on every day, there is a discussion, time and again on Kandhahar, Gujarat riots, 1984 sikh riots, Babri Masjid, Kandhamal riots, Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi, Varun Gandhi etc. But no discussion on economic meltdown or on poverty? Our anchors are behaving like jokers. I am not surprised to read the views of Mr. Akar Patel.

Posted On 4/26/2009 9:55:41 AM
Arcopol Said:


This is by far one of the most brilliant write-ups ever, comparing Advani and Manmohan Singh. The link to this article is spreading virally across the web and I'm so glad its exposed Advani in the way he deserves to be.

Posted On 4/26/2009 10:53:21 AM
manisha Said:


An eye-opener in many ways especially when you consider a lot of the facts are out of Advani's book.

Posted On 4/26/2009 12:04:44 PM
Re: manisha Said:


My neighbour's son- whom i'd grown up with playing catching catch, was killed in the ayodhya riots. I've even seen the vedio (supposedly banned) of how the police treated people and how they'd carry off half charred bodies and throw them into the river. I've seen in the vedio, the police open firing at the camera man, a journalist. All i've heard since my teens, about this man , is the unrest he's been the cause of. You're right about the article. I do not see the journalist's opinion in the article, All I see are facts which have been put together against facts about Manmohan singh. I'd lose faith in it all if LKA becomes PM. His history shows he'll be a very weak one. I guess he's doing it to just fullfill his personal ambition of being PM. its not for the party, its not for the country and certainly not for the people.

Posted On 4/28/2009 11:45:00 AM
Santhosh Said:


I doubt whether the writer and the readers who commented against the article understood the complexity of Indian politics. The writer thinks a good economic strategy is the 'one-size-fit-all' solution to our problems. Many of the readers commented about the author being 'biased', because he highlighted all the shortcomings of 'their' leader. One thing I always find funny is that naysayers of the 'Gandhi-dynasty' rule in congress conveniently forgets Varun Gandhi, the most dangerous of all the three third generation Gandhis being on their side. I think neither MMS, nor LKA is capable enough to lead this phenomenon called India. What India needs is a great political leader who can lead forward the people of this country, having a team of economists, educationists, scientists, administrators working with her/him. A seasoned politician/economist leading the team alone is NOT a solution to India's problems. It needs strong statesmen to lead a country as diverse as ours - who can think, who understands, who can take decisions, who is compassionate, who is practical, who tolerates no nonsense and above all whom the people admire as well so that he/she is the decision maker. But we cannot expect Mohandas Gandhis or George Washingtons to be born at all times right…

Posted On 4/26/2009 5:16:25 PM
JH Said:


"He is cold-blooded enough to ignore the corruption of his allied ministers, because he understands it’s unimportant in the long run." Is Aakar patel out of his mind ? This single sentence alone shows the intellectual bankruptcy of the author.How on earth does the 20,000 crores lost in the 3G scam not matter ?!!The rest of the article reads like a low-budget political advertisement and can be ripped to shreds.Even by Mint standards, its an Absolute embarrassment of an article.

Posted On 4/26/2009 6:34:21 PM
Ganesh Said:


My quarrel is not with Aakar Patel, who discredits himself. I am not surprised that he writes the way he does. He is after all attempting to further his career and be noticed as a uber liberal, uber secular man of ideas. He is clearly out to impress the paragons of secular virtue, the ‘Masters of Our Universe’, the triumvirate of English News Channels. Do not be surprised if you soon see him as an expert on these channels holding forth on various subjects. My quarrel is with the Mint Editorial Team. In an environment, where Media has been captured by ‘Left Liberals’, your paper has been an island of sanity. Surely, people like Aakar Patel should have no difficulty in finding takers in the Media outside LiveMint? Are you so short on columnists that you should allow your paper to be used by such cheap pamphleteers? Your columns in Lounge are highly personalised opinions of individuals. They tend to be confused and at times set out very silly reasons in defence of their fanciful theories. By and large, it is harmless fun and can be ignored. But Aakar Patel is something else! There is no use attempting to critique a man who is so incorrigible. He is entitled to his views on Advani. But surely editorial balance would demand that a column is not reduced to the level of a political speech! My advice to Patel is that he should aim higher. ‘Expert’ on a TV talk show is too small for his talents. He should enter politics right away. His love for Congress matches his hero’s love for the Family. He is just 39 years old [his online profile informs us], so he should do better than his hero and get himself elected to the Lok Sabha.

Posted On 4/26/2009 6:54:49 PM
Animesh Said:


Had it been a comparison of two presidential candidates, I would have been in favour of Dr. Singh. But in selecting LEADER of a GOVERNMENT that rules more than 1 Billion people, most of whom live in villages how could a good education and a good knowledge of economy be the only parameters. And I suppose, the government can hire financial advisors with good education and good knowledge(Here I am referring to Dr. Singh aged 30). So, ultimately it comes down to decision making and implementing them.

Posted On 4/27/2009 8:56:44 AM
Deepak Said:


Rampant corruption by top ranked ministers,murderous ministers, divisive ministers in the name of caste, inefficient ministers like Balu who didnt add to the crumbling infrastructure are unimportant in the long run to MMS as per Mr. Patel but the fine distinction between tapeworm and guinea worm are. Give me a break please. The reason I shifted from the other pink papers to mint was I found the objectivity high, but looks like you are falling into the trap of a total congress mouthpiece like your parent newspaper HT is. Get a life guys..

Posted On 4/27/2009 9:21:17 AM
Arjun Said:


Renuka said somewhere above:- "As a senior manager in an MNC for the past 12 years, can confidently say that the elite, educated lot are all hands down for Mr. Manmohan Singh as the leader to lead India" :) we know managers' opinions are not respected by team members. That apart, although the accusations levelled against Advani are almost fair enough, the point about the first question asked of Singh seems facile. Reporters might have read up Singh's bio on Wikipedia and asked him an economy-related question, while the same procedure might lead them to ask Advani about the Babri demolition. So that's a silly comparison. But for people who don't have the patience to trudge through 986 pages of megalomania, this article is a good precis.

Posted On 4/27/2009 9:59:51 AM
vin Said:


This is not a fair comparison. I am not pro-bjp but this article is lopsided. A comparison should have both positives and negatives. This one doesn't even try to 'seem' unprejudiced. Not expected this of Mint.

Posted On 4/27/2009 11:08:22 AM
shadows Said:


>>> He’s still doing terrorism. Are you sure you were an editor for 10 years ?? Which newspaper ??

Posted On 4/27/2009 12:06:56 PM
shadows Said:


>>> He thumps his chest and warns Pakistan to behave after taking India nuclear, but is taken aback when Pakistan’s generals immediately use this as an excuse to weaponize their own programme. This has destabilized South Asia for generations. You actually think that Pakis would not have gone nuclear if India hadnt... Actually Pakis were so smart that they made a bomb in 15 days from scratch, because India went nuclear, is it? Do you really think Advani's chest thumping was the reason for Paki making nukes or "weaponize their own programme" ?? Personally, I am not a fan of LK Advani, but I think he is surrounded by some best political minds - Arun Jaitley, Yashwant Sinha, Narendra Modi, etc. >>> At 30, he understood the problem with Nehru’s economic model. At 59, he got the chance to set it right, and he did. No, he is a typical bureaucrat, and he was ordered by Narasimha Rao to do so.. Manmohan wrongly gets credit for economic reforms !! If you think about it, the real architects of the reforms was probably IMF. But we needed to safeguard our interests too, and PV Narasimha Rao did a good job.

Posted On 4/27/2009 12:20:55 PM
bharath Said:


'His policies....' His policies??? India was in so much debt that it had to implement the changes called by the IMF. 'He shamelessly laughs...' Y?? Coz he has no answer??? 'He is ruthless enough..' Anything goes to keep the govt?? 'He is cold-blooded enough...' or blind???? 'At 30.. At 59..' Thats more than half of democratic India's age. 'the world looks to MMS for answers...' But does he have any???

Posted On 4/28/2009 3:13:07 AM
Ajit Said:


This is a highly informative, factual article. I find it v. funny that the RSS types who are calling it biased can't quote a single fact to substantiate their allegation. Now I wonder where Advani got that LLB.... Hmmmmmm... maybe from the same place Varun Gandhi got his phoren degree...?

Posted On 4/28/2009 3:14:55 AM
Anju Said:


Is Mr. Aakar campaigning for Congress? It surely looks like that.. I am a Mint fan and I am disappointed to see that it has publishes such a factually skewed and biased article put forward in such a bad taste during election season! Mr. Aakar's article may well be summarised as following : Advani is a devil with two horns and Manmohan is god sent angel!

Posted On 4/28/2009 11:09:56 AM
Salil Said:


Aakar, excellent piece. If Satyajit Ray were to make kapurush-o-mahapurush, he wouldn't have to look far for protagonists.

Posted On 4/28/2009 6:25:18 PM
Ankur Said:


The one thing I respected the left liberal media was for its fair-mindedness, respect for facts and restraint in face of provocation. But after reading this article, I must say I am very disappointed, and will stop reading LiveMint from now on. Guess, there is nothing really that separates the demagogues on both the sides. The way in which conclusions have been derived from skewed facts, and broad characterizations have been drawn would have done Goebbels proud. Bravo Aakar, way to go!

Posted On 4/28/2009 7:18:26 PM
mani Said:


The facts are there in this article. But the way it has been written is what is making it biased. The commenter who assumes that anyone against this article is from RSS or pro-bjp is making the same mistake that the author has made- assuming and then concluding based on half the facts. I am against BJP in general but I that dos not mean I want to read articles written by amateurs whose personal vendettas come out in their writing. It would have been an interesting article had facts been given about Singh and esp. not quoted with each sentence sounding like a fan writing.

Posted On 4/28/2009 11:18:44 PM
Jeyanth Said:


Well I agree that the article is biased, but it does throw a lot of light on the real strong hypocritical Mr.Advani. It would have been really an interesting one if the author had brought out more facts to support his theory on Mr Singh. This sentence "He is cold-blooded enough to ignore the corruption of his allied ministers, because he understands it’s unimportant in the long run" is particularly disgusting, the state of affairs in this country is in a pathetic shape because of the repressive policies and corruption of the previous generation politicians... so it is important in the long run Mr Patel!

Posted On 4/29/2009 3:27:31 AM
ruchir Said:


Well it does not make much sense to only pointing out at the negative event (again negative according to ur thought) of ones life and positive of other. Ram mandir is matter of debate and I personally dont subscribe for that. Although I strongly feel that yes hindu deserve temple out there but certainly not at the cost of several lives of innocents. Right or wrong but it also implies manegerial capability of Mr Advani who rose BJP from merely having 2 seats in 84 elections to what it is today. Radical measures are needed today and not merely economics text books. Mr. Singh is a great person but perhaps his party is not so aggresive in taking strong descions which is now quite implicitly known in their rule of 5 yrs.

Posted On 4/29/2009 3:37:09 PM
shocked Said:


I have one word to say : Shameless. It's such a shameless plug for Congress that I'm thinking of withdrawing my subscription. It seems that Mint, particularly Lounge is going the HT way too, of hardcore pro-congress bigotry. I feel an intangible disgust just thinking of what would have prompted Aakar Patel to have written that sort of article, what kickbacks? Ditto for Salil Tripathi. Does Mint not think its readers worthy enough to form their own opinions, political or otherwise? Do you have to continuously enforce your own one-sided (damned, if i may add) political views onto readers? Put in the basest form, Have you too sold your soul like your mother publication HT? I'm ashamed of the fact that I really used to like Mint, till about some 30 minutes back.

Posted On 5/1/2009 11:09:43 PM
personalVendetta Said:


As shocked as I am after reading this article as others in this forum. This looks like a clearly motivated personal vendetta. Have we not already seen the ugly side of congress? Do we have an alternative? I guess so.. Congress has created so many communal dis-harmony by just supporting one community. So as I understand any thing anti-hindu is secular. Have you seen in any democracy people having 2 different sets of rules for different communities? Who did that? Why are we posing a blind eye to all the evil that went loose in congress time? You loose another reader for writing such senseless article.

Posted On 5/21/2009 2:07:21 AM