Logwritten
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 08, 2009 3:38 PM IST

Chakadoba, West Bengal: India has seen several attacks by so-called Maoists since 1 April, the most violent of these being the killing of 19 people in simultaneous attacks across Jharkhand, Orissa, Bihar and Chhattisgarh on 16 April, the day elections to the 15th Lok Sabha began.

Since the late 1960s, the Maoists are said to have killed an estimated 6,000 people. The frequency of their attacks has risen in recent times. Some analysts consider the Maoists India’s biggest threat in terms of internal security. Yet, they remain a shadowy group or loose affiliation of groups, preferring to live in jungles from where they emerge to carry out guerilla attacks, and shunning all forms of publicity.

On his terms: Koteshwar Rao, the 51-year-old Maoist leader, refused to be photographed. Indranil Bhoumik / Mint

On his terms: Koteshwar Rao, the 51-year-old Maoist leader, refused to be photographed. Indranil Bhoumik / Mint

In a rare interview, Koteshwar Rao, a member of the politburo of the Communist Party of India (Maoist), the underground outfit’s highest decision-making body, who is also head of the ultra-left party’s guerilla operations in West Bengal, Jharkhand and Orissa, said the Maoists had joined forces with separatist groups in the North-East such as the United Liberation Front of Asom (Ulfa) in Assam, the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in Manipur.

“We support all outfits fighting state-sponsored oppression—the likes of Ulfa, NSCN and PLA—because our enemy is common. We have recently signed an MoU (memorandum of understanding) with the NSCN, Ulfa and PLA for helping each other in our fight against the state,” Rao said in the interview that took place in the deep interiors of a forest in the West Midnapore district of West Bengal.

Rao has been on the run from law enforcement bodies for 31 years and is guarded by a protective circle of 25 bodyguards. The 51-year-old Maoist leader refused to be photographed and set his own terms for the meeting. Mint’s reporters were asked to arrive at a school in Chakadoba where they waited for around 5 hours. At around dusk, they were escorted to where Rao was—a clearing in the jungle that was reached after a brisk 30-minute walk.

In a conversation that lasted at least 5 hours, Rao, who greeted the reporters with the Maoist “Lal salaam” or red salute, explained the Maoist philosophy. And his group’s ultimate objective. Edited excerpts:

The administration alleges that you ambush people and run away—that you don’t have the courage to fight them…

1  2 3 4 5 
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
C Said:


It is utterly disgusting that a premium business magazine with a very balanced Economic and Political views have to Glorify such terrorists like Koteshwar Rao, who is blatanty threatening about vertically splitting India with the help from ULFA,NSCN,PLA, etc. I wish you had taken some GPRS devices and got these cowards ambushed and wiped out of existence, with the help of the Army's Special Forces. You spent Five Hours with them and it shows that the State Police Forces do not have the kind of Intelligence network like yours!!! If he really wants to fight for the upliftment of the poor he should come out in the open and join the main stream. Otherwise, he wd only misguide the youth and waste a lot of innocent lives of his own cadre as well as those from the Forces. From Nepal to Warangal, we have this menace running thro' Bihar,Chattisgarh,Bengal,Orissa,Jharkhand,Maharashtra and AP.It very well fits into the Grand Scheme of China to vertically split India. They have already made nice inroads in both Pakistan and Myanmar by building super Highways and Defence bases. Gwadar Port near Karachi is an Example. But as a national business paper, you have stooped low by Glorifying such a Pest!!!

Posted On 5/29/2009 9:43:29 AM
Arvind Said:


Good stuff, interesting to read.But your Reporters failed to ask few concrete questions regarding their activities in India: 1).Considering the size of India- do the Maoist have any concrete plan of action or strategy for the entire country or do they want to Play the Robin Hood in some rural under priviled pockets only? 2).Don't they feel that the Maoists are alienated for from the majority of the country?If they don't come to mainstream politics how do they plan to counter the propaganda of the 'state' that has brandished them as outlaws? 3).Do they have any concrete economic plan for development of the nation? 4).isn't it an ambitious and utopian idea to fight the state with their oganisation considering the magnitude of the Government force? 5). Aren't they just sticking to their path as it is a matter of survival for them rather than to solve a serious socio-political question? Hope to see a sequel to this some-time.

Posted On 5/29/2009 1:50:41 PM
Sudip Said:


What is your idea? Are you trying to make a hero outof him?What about the cold blooded killings of the civilians and innocent people?A killing is a killing is a killing and there is no reason to have any sympathy for these so called self proclaimed revolutionaries.

Posted On 5/29/2009 5:18:51 PM
Biplab Said:


Very good story.

Posted On 5/29/2009 8:41:15 PM
indian Said:


thanx for desposing these moist . Now I can confidently say that have no people base and will be wiped out ! sooner is better for everybody as we are only wasting our resources by fighting each other .

Posted On 5/29/2009 11:48:10 PM
Nirmalendu Said:


Though we can sympathize to some extent with their cause it's dangerous that his party is allying with ULFA - an organization notorious for ethnic cleansing, xenophobic terrorism, extortions, killings, devoid of any humanitarian ideology (not to speak of socialism) ! Even in Assam, the ULFA is increasingly isolated among the common Assamese people.It's sad to see that the Maoists decided to ally with them

Posted On 5/30/2009 12:17:09 PM
Subrata Said:


What do they want achieve with terror? Its easy to say state sponsored terrorism, but Naxalites are no less terroists. We have seen the Naxalbari movement, what did it achieve? I think some fundamental questions needed to be asked, rather than a few incidents and a glimpse into his personal life. If he believes in this form of Communism, his views should have been debated with facts of the 21st century. The interview does have a shade of sympathy for the man and glorification of the cause, this does not make much sense to a common man like me. Does that mean that every injustice that happens in life should be faced with violence. Its unfortunate that we still think of such primitive methods to achieve nothing.

Posted On 6/1/2009 5:41:15 PM