Logwritten
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009 4:20 AM IST

New Delhi: The government plans to scrap the top two regulators of higher education in line with the recommendations of the National Knowledge Commission (NKC), the advisory body to the Prime Minister that has repeatedly called for the abolition of the regulatory regime in the education sector.

A senior official of the ministry of human resource development said on condition of anonymity that the government will soon scrap the University Grants Commission, or UGC, and the All India Council for Technical Education, or AICTE. The two regulators, which oversee the functioning of universities and engineering and business schools in India, have often received flak for restrictive policies and sometimes opaque functioning.

The ministry, headed by Kapil Sibal, will instead create an independent National Council for Higher Education (NCHE), which will take over the academic, accreditation and financial functions of the regulators. The move is based on the recommendations of a panel set up by the government to review the functioning of the UGC, established in 1956, and the AICTE, which came into existence in 1987.

The panel, headed by physicist and educationist Yash Pal, was set up to study NKC recommendations on the two regulators. The committee also recommends a self-regulatory regime for universities, including the Indian Institutes of Technology and Indian Institutes of Management.

“Abolition of the regulators would mean restoration of the decision-making powers to the universities. So far, the universities have had to wait for permission from the UGC or the AICTE for even small matters, which could just be introducing an academic course,” Apoorva Anand, member of the committee and a professor at Delhi University, said.

The creation of a single regulator would also do away with the multiplicity of regulatory bodies in the higher education system in India. Besides the UGC and the AICTE, the Medical Council of India and the Dental Council of India, both regulators under the ministry of health and family welfare, oversee the functioning of medical and dental colleges. The Yash Pal panel has called for their abolition too.

In a draft report last year, trade body Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (Ficci) had said the existing regulatory framework constrains the supply of good institutions, excessively regulates existing institutions in the wrong places, and is not conducive to innovation or creativity in higher and technical education.

“Regulators are meant to facilitate growth and innovation rather than regulate. UGC has been using its power to grant funds as a tool of regulation... Both the regulators have too many retired bureaucrats as officials, which have only been facilitating government interference into the functioning of educational institutions,” said C.S. Venkat Ratnam, member of the Ficci education committee and director of New Delhi-based International Management Institute.

The ministry official said the government is moving towards total implementation of the Yash Pal report, which also suggests scrapping of the deemed university status for state and private institutions. The status of deemed universities has allowed them to operate free of government control in admissions, fees and coursework. Sibal, after taking charge, ordered a review of at least 125 institutions that have been granted the status.

Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Gopalakrishnan Said:


This may be the one of the excellant move taken by the Government if it is done. Even small matters requires lot of decision making leads to corruption in the system. Try to have a system whish is more transparent and answerable to people of our country.

Posted On 6/12/2009 5:36:59 PM
nagesh Said:


This is an excellent initiative by the Government to scrap UGC , and AICTE Inspite of facilitating quality education and decision making these regulatory bodies are hindrance for the growth of quality higher education in present era of globalization. India has a great potential in competing with the Developed world in higher education, the proposed National commission of Higher Education should allow functioning of Higher education institutes without any hassles and hindrances.

Posted On 6/22/2009 12:18:23 PM
Re: ashutosh Said:


knoledge about new technical education and norms of new technical education.

Posted On 10/5/2009 12:20:12 PM
Prasad Said:


I would call it excellent decision if implemented. Also, incapable lecturers, readers and professors et.al should also be scrapped from their jobs if they cannot bring revenues to the university. Further, there should be no more reservation quota (other than physically handicapped) for any university jobs. This is because we need quality people to do research/teaching. Stringent rules to be put for granting funds to a project such that it brings back money to country in atleast 3-4 years. Don't fund non-revenue generating projects and to people who never could convert research to money for our country. Thanking you, Prasad

Posted On 6/23/2009 1:09:31 PM
Vinay Said:


I am engaged in engineering education and have personally observed the corrupt functioning of AICTE officials or professor's appointed by the body.Abolishing AICTE and UGC does not mean that we will improve on the quality of higher education. Mushrooming of engineering and other professional institutions is welcome provided they maintain the standards. But the corrupt indianians will eat-up all good moves and intentions. Hope is little but let's hope for betterment.

Posted On 6/23/2009 4:09:38 PM
rajiv Said:


dear hrd minister, there is no doubt about the acumen of intellectuals like prof. yash pal, the recommendations of the committee headed by him, if implemented- shall depend on the political will or shall we read- will of the bureaucracy. it has been rightly mentioned that government officials should act as facilitators not regulators. it is unfortunate that in this country of immense talent a handful of babus selected through a written upsc exam which anyone can cram and pass, run the country- have held the nation to intellectual ransom. when we select the so called elite through an academic test with no aptitude test we can expect but only this. our country deserves much higher rating in the world arena coz, despite the impediments our men and women have excelled on the world stage. yet, how many nobel awards, how many olympic medals, how many reseach publications-our institutions of higher learning are infact closing departments due to lack of research associates or shall we say even our institutions have heads who have been there only coz they did not have the aptitude but the academic qr which they afforded by studying for a certain exam and passed without aptitude. teachers today or even in the past managed to do btc, bed, and completed a course to become eligible to teach, without having aptitude. the scenario today, be it passing a unit test in kindergarten or clearing civil services exam, is shortlisting those who score high and not who have aptitude, lot of brain storming needs to be done to facilitate aptitude testing as our children grow up, remove the learning by rote mechanism by abolishing all exams at all levels, substituting with cumulative and comprehensive evaluation for which teachers with aptitude need to be trained. the tuition centres have taken over the school education which is redundent as most students attribute their academic report to their mentors at the tuition centres and not to their schools where they imbibe the fundamentals of life

Posted On 6/25/2009 10:57:10 AM
rajani Said:


I feel the the proposal to improve higher education system, if implemented soon, would be an innovative step by UPA Government. Corruption and musroomgrowth of private institutions and deemed universities should be abolished.

Posted On 6/25/2009 11:29:48 AM
Amitabh Said:


Implementation of Prof. Yash Pal report would be a nice thing to restrict misuse of powers by UGC and AICTE for petty matters, hope it is implemented for the betterment of the institutes producing quality professionals.

Posted On 6/25/2009 12:02:43 PM
Yerramsetti Said:


It is a great movement from the Ministry side to scrap the top two regulators of higher education (UGC and AICTE) and create an independent National Council for Higher Education (NCHE) instead of. The credit goes to Kapil Sibal, Union Minister of HRD, if implemented. Hope for the best societal need.

Posted On 6/26/2009 10:34:55 AM
ganesh Said:


If implemented to scrap UGC and AICTE, that should be the right decision and well thought out plan. Of course, the Universities concerned must be empowered as decision making authorities. It's always true that those retired occupy high places and do not allow youngsters to come up and rule, on the assumption that they possess inadequate experience. But it is not the reality. The strategic and timely decisions can intelligently be made only by youngsters. Of course, the guidance of elders in need of the hour. I pat the recommendation of the committee.

Posted On 7/4/2009 8:42:00 PM
Ravi Said:


it is the best decision of HRD minister kappil sibal and yashpal comittie.

Posted On 7/10/2009 1:02:08 AM
Rama Said:


This is the best move. Scrapping UGC will be the ending of all confusions and it will lead to better education policy.

Posted On 7/13/2009 2:27:14 PM
Bhargav Said:


The news is very encouraging for the education system in India. A lot of time is wasted in the multiplicity of regulatory norms. Moreover for better courses we need fast decisions and we only hope that NCHE will deliver to our expectations. This is infact one of the best decisions of the HRD ministry in the recent years.

Posted On 7/14/2009 11:30:33 AM
Rajendra Said:


There is no use changing names of regulator only.In every country regulatror has to be there.Otherwise every one in home will start giving degrees by taking money.Those who have money and power of network will exploit it the most.They are already doing it. Top politicians, industrialist and big names attached to fraudulent setups.We should instead make UGC and AICTE accrediting bodies with self assessment guidelines for universities and institutes and stop them from interfering in functioning of Institutes. Research is another area which is fourth rate or even worst in India.In technical education user representation is must. In technology field insisting for PhD type of third rate and marginal use degrees should be dispensed with and business experience of faculty made compulsory abnd basic requirement.Imaging a doctor teaching about heart without going to OT. I have founf several teaxchers of engineering and management having no midea about equipment or field concepts.How advertising actually takes place.How your plans fail and how to ,launch a product.How a DC motor loks like.How a cable is to be selected for factory use? In short education needs strict guideliens for accredition and regulations on fees to be charged by universities and private institutes.The autonomous AICTE approved institutes giving PGDM type diplomas are worst in exploiting system fault and charging huge fees with third rate set up and fraudulent quality norms and charging huge fees like Rs 2 to 4 lacs per year that is almost 5 to 10 times what is allowed by state universities to their affiliated institutes.Why there is so much difference? Either former make huge profits or the latter are spoling quality.Our planners should not act blind and stop exploitation of gullible and helpless millions of students every year.Changing names of regulator without changing corruption metality and regualation system fault wont make any diffrence.Mr Sibal or no Mr Sibal.Mr Yashpal or no Mr Yashpal.

Posted On 8/3/2009 2:28:54 PM