Log has written
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2009

On 27 November 2008, a film crew began work on location in Philadelphia, US, trying to replicate a terrorist attack. Most members of the crew, including the film’s director Rensil D’Silva, were from Mumbai.

Before he arrived on location, he had spent hours in front of CNN watching the Taj hotel under siege—and the surreal paralysis of his city that followed.

New York minute: In New York John Abraham and Neil Nitin Mukesh play Muslim roles.

New York minute: In New York John Abraham and Neil Nitin Mukesh play Muslim roles.

For him, as perhaps for most members of the crew, recreating a terrorist attack that day, in front of high definition cameras, was a disturbing, even eerie, task. Qurbaan (a working title), produced by Karan Johar (Dharma Productions), was suddenly akin to what was unfolding in Mumbai.

The film’s protagonist, played by Saif Ali Khan, an “urban, educated, liberal” Muslim, in love with a Hindu girl (played by Kareena Kapoor), was in the throes of a crisis because of a similar terrorist act. “I will never forget that shoot,” D’Silva says.

I met D’Silva more than six months after that day, at the ad agency where he works as creative director. “But now when I look back, I believe that the film, more so its main characters, are all the more relevant, and more contemporary in the post-26/11 world,” he says.

The film releases in theatres, uncannily, on 26 November. It will be the Eid weekend.

D’Silva’s hero (the screenplay is also by D’Silva), modelled on Muslim guys he interacts with in the city, can be monikered “the new Bollywood Muslim”—defined, unfortunately, more by what he is not, rather than what he is. He is not the decadent, sozzled nawab cavorting with courtesans; not “Khan chacha”, the benevolent other, wearing a Faiz topi, sneaked into the plot as a secular prop; not an underworld don or a don’s sidekick; and not a crazed, wronged jihadi.

Ironically, in an industry dominated by Muslim directors, producers, composers, lyricists, actors and junior artists, a Muslim character that doesn’t fall into any of these categories is rare. One that immediately comes to mind was created in the 1980s: Salim in Salim Langde Pe Mat Ro (1989), directed by Saeed Mirza, which subverted stereotypes for the sake of “mean streets” realism. It portrayed the existential and social frustrations of a young man from a lower economic class in Mumbai who resorted to extortion and petty crimes to defy the society. More recently, Iqbal in Nagesh Kukunoor’s eponymous film— again, a young man on the margins of society—had nothing to do with religious identity.

1  2 3 4 
Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Santhosh Said:


Shah Rukh Khan played a Muslim in a lead role for the first time in 2007. What did he play as in the movie "Hey Raam" then?

Posted On 6/26/2009 2:25:35 PM
Re: Angad Said:


SRK's character in Hey Ram was not for the lead role. His was an important one, but Kamal Haasan had the lead role.

Posted On 6/29/2009 1:46:51 AM
Subbarao Said:


While the negative or positive stereotyping of Muslim character has been going on for a long time, there is no lack of effort on the part of Bollywood media to be, or at least appear to be balanced. This happens by showing that either the Muslim character went bad because of circumstances, police excess or communal riots or the character undergoes change of heart or there is bad Hindu or a good Muslim character to balance. But is ignored is the continued tendency to blame the society or the majority community for the educational and occupational backwardness of Muslims. The contention of Syed Ali Mujtaba fits into the blame every one else category. Even though the Bollywood is full of Khans, Cricket team has had two Muslim captains, IT has Azim Premji, this crowd glorifying victim hood is alive and kicking. Instead of promoting education in science and maths and this tendency to blame all the ills of Muslim society on others tends to shunt Muslim children off to a Madrassa. This not going to help anyone.

Posted On 6/26/2009 9:56:28 PM
Re: DVader Said:


Extremely well put.While every community (including Muslims) have their legitimate set of grievances against society,it is only among Muslims that this tendency assumes gargantuan proportions ; up to the point that larger Indian-Muslim body ends up espousing schizoid views that parcels responsibility of each & every problem onto the 'Kafir' or the 'other'.Even in aftermath of 26/11 no less than a Cabinet rank minister (AR Antulay) gave voice to what millions of Muslims felt - that the Sangh Parivar was behind 26/11 in order to finish off Karkare - an incredibly outrageous theory that was propounded extensively among the Urdu press (which is removed from the mainstream media as it can be).Similarly every other problem (Education/Jobs/Healthcare etc.) is due to the Hindu-majority.Its highly unlikely that the "perennial victimhood" mindset of the community is going to change,which implies India will go through some extremely difficult times in the years to come.

Posted On 6/29/2009 1:46:24 PM
Sameera Said:


Mr. Said, regarding your comment, may I please refer you to the following article: http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0104/p01s04-wosc.html

Posted On 6/29/2009 11:00:49 AM
Re: TRV Said:


There are far too many logical inconsistencies in the article for this to qualify as serious journalism.Let me take one point : The article claims that Muslims' status is almost as bad as that of Dalits.Fair enough.And later on goes on to say that even though Muslims' share of the savings in Banks is 30% they receive only 9% of the total credit (and hence are victims of discrimination).My question is how can Muslims - approx 15% of the population (and that too the lower strata) - own a whopping 30% of the savings in India ? (whether Banks even keep the account-holders religious identity in their records is just one among numerous other queries that boggle the mind).And even if this specious statistic is true,it then implies that a community which owns one-third of the national savings can be anything but poor & marginalized! Very low standards of journalism and a pitifully unbalanced article.

Posted On 6/29/2009 2:51:49 PM
Umair Said:


I think this piece is somewhat simplistic, inasmuch as it doesn't adequately engage with the varieties of representations found in Hindi films.

Posted On 6/30/2009 8:29:02 PM