Log has written
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009

New Delhi: Presenting her third railway budget and the first of the new government that took over in May, rail minister Mamata Banerjee surprised many people when she flagged the sharp fiscal deterioration in the department—a flashback to her first stint at the job, when Indian Railways hit a financial crisis forcing it to default on its annual dividend payments to the Union government.

Banerjee said that her ministry would soon bring out a “white paper”, or study, explaining the state of the department’s finances.

Drawing down: Mamata Banerjee. Rajkumar / Mint

Drawing down: Mamata Banerjee. Rajkumar / Mint

While Banerjee hasn’t set a deadline for the presentation of the white paper, the minister has already blown a hole in the claim of her predecessor, Lalu Prasad, that he had rescued the railways from fiscal ruin and also set it on the path of a sustained recovery.

In fact, as Mint had reported on 6 June, portions of Banerjee’s budget speech that were edited out provided data to back the new rail minister’s claim.

One such paragraph said that the balances in several railway funds parked with the Reserve Bank of India were projected to decline from Rs22,279 crore in 2007-08 to Rs8,361 crore by 2009-10.

Also See Tracking Trains (Graphics)

“To fund our massive network expansion programme, completion of capacity enhancement works and timely replacement of overaged assets, the Plan Expenditure has been sustained in the two years of 2008-09 and 2009-10 through draw-down from our accumulated fund balances, which may not be possible in the future,” the version of the speech which was not read said.

The Lalu Prasad years

The story of the railways till Prasad took charge was that of a bloated and direction-less public sector undertaking. However, the five years Prasad was at the helm saw a dramatic turnaround in the organization’s basic financial metrics. When he took charge, the railways was spending Rs91 to earn Rs100—often referred to as the operating ratio, or the proportion of expenses to income. Just before he demited office in 2009, the railways was spending Rs88.30 to earn Rs100, leaving the country’s biggest transporter with a tidy surplus. In his interim budget, Prasad projected that this would slip, but marginally to Rs89.90.

But, as Banerjee found out, the projections were conservative and she has now estimated that the number will rise to Rs92.50—the worst since 2002-03.

The debate, consequently, has shifted to how Prasad effected the improvement.

According to Sudhir Kumar, the officer on special duty who is credited with spearheading the strategy to transform the railways, it was managed by “focusing on what works”. In his book Bankruptcy to Billions: How the Indian Railways Transformed (co-authored with Shagun Mehrotra), Kumar claims that the organization went from near banktruptcy to $6 billion (Rs29,640 crore) in surplus.

Lalu Prasad could not be reached for comment and Kumar did not respond to a call made to his office.

Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
A Said:


The article is rather immature.Firstly, I dont think you have understood the meaning of bust?.Even with Rs 8000 crores in surplus earnings the railways can hardly be called bust?.I think you are merely using a catchy phrase without understanding its true meaning.Please note when you use technical terms you should be careful about the meaning and correct usage.Secondly, is this document to which you are referring an authentic copy of the budget speech. You should only be using authentic material placed before Parliament.In other words you should be relying on authentic figures and not on data which you please to use.The second part of your article is even more ludicrous.You have paid only minimal stress on the unpreceedented growth in GDP enjoyed in the last five years.If you had borthered to run a long run time series regression between the performance of the railways(dependent variable) and state of the economy, turnaround strategy etc(explanatory variabless)your analysis would have been better.Your article is simply firing arrows in all directions without arriving at any meaningful conclusion.

Posted On 7/14/2009 9:36:51 AM
Rohit Said:


Though the tone of the article is that Lalu Prasad (LP) did something wrong and Mamata Bannerjee (MB) is out correcting it, in my opinion, leaders at the helm have different styles and thought processes. LP and MB seem to have different ways of looking at the same thing. While one wants to comply with a long term profitability, the other may see light in short terms gains to meet long term ones. Every CEO operates the same company differently. It doesn't mean that one way is right and other one wrong. I agree wit a previous comment, the article is mis-titled and not in the right spirit of business.

Posted On 7/14/2009 1:13:18 PM
Anil Said:


Even mamata is trying to make cheap popularity. garibraths was a gr8 move of laly. only that since criterion for the pair of cities which will be linked by garibath was not transparent and was not rational not all people are equally benefitted. for example there is garibrath bewtwween mumbai-jabalpur pune-nagpur why is there no garibarath between mumbai-nagpur, mumbai-bangalore. perhaps best move will be to replace ac 3 tier coaxches with garibarath ac 3tier coaches and increse their number to atleast 4 on every train( around 20% reduction in fare) so that garibrath movement will spread. in the similar vein arther than mamata starting intercity double decker ac expresses between some pair of cities a beytter move is to replace the traditional ac chair car in trains to Double decker ac coaches with 30% reduction in fare. one of the most failed move was that of samprkkranti express . these are not fast upto the mark and moreover some samparkkranties like Yeshwantpue- h. nizamuddin take a longer route and nonstop a foolosh strategic mangement, beofre starting any yuya express( again a wrong m and cheap popularity move) it will be nice to streamline and merge some samparkkrantis with swarnajayantis, replace garibarths with garibarth coaches on all trains , increse the frequency of bandra -nizamuudin garibrath to daily( a really gr8 train started by lalu in contrst to youva or durantos), increse frequecies of rajdhanis ( and make them garibraths) rather than durantos( even durantos will have to stop for operational reasons) as far as better operations mangement is concerned. every railway minister tries to start some speciifc brand like shatabdis, samaprkkrantis durabnntos. tjhe really people oriened was garibaraths , and samparkkrantis/yuvas double decker ac intercitiy trains are populist moves incresing sporadicness of schedules and creating a chaos in schedules and operations.

Posted On 7/14/2009 5:45:43 PM
IRCTC Said:


The on lining booking system really is boon for people like use, now we don't have to wait for hours in a long line and Using IRCTC we can book tickets from the comfort of our home.i have had a good experience with the site so far.

Posted On 7/31/2009 11:50:55 AM