Logwritten
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2009 10:39 AM IST

Mumbai: The wage negotiation for close to nine million employees of public sector banks is unlikely to end soon with the government reneging on an earlier promise on a 17.5% wage hike.

A finance ministry official, who does not want to be identified, said the government is instead offering a 13% rise. Bank employees had received a 13.5% wage hike in the last wage pact that expired on 31 October 2007. The Indian Banks’ Association, or IBA, a national bankers’ lobby, brokers the five-year wage deal with trade unions.

According to the ministry official, the government is also not willing to compromise on other issues such as a second pension option or extending the date for implementing the revised pension scheme for new employees.

The talks are not progressing, said a senior IBA official and C.H. Venkatachalam, convener of the United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU), an umbrella organization of nine bank unions.

A UFBU delegation led by Venkatachalam on Tuesday met IBA chairman M.V. Nair, also the chairman and managing director of Union Bank of India, for resuming talks.

Nair did not commit to anything, said Venkatachalam.

“This is something unprecedented. We are going on strike on 6 and 7 August to demand resumption of talks and to expedite the process,” he said.

The finance ministry had earlier agreed to a 17.5% hike for bank employees. IBA, in June, offered a 17% hike to UFBU but the officers’ organizations declined the offer.

IBA and the unions had also agreed to share the burden of a second option on pension to those employees who had not opted for it earlier.

As per an independent actuary calculation, the additional burden from revisiting the pension scheme would have been about Rs6,000 crore. The bank unions and IBA, on behalf of banks, had agreed to share this between themselves.

As per the agreement, 70% of the additional burden would have been shared by banks and 30% by the employees. However, no deal was signed.

The finance ministry official said the government does not want to offer the second pension option now due to ambiguity on the quantum of the additional burden on banks.

The unions also want all new employees joining banks till March 2012 to be covered by the existing pension scheme, while the government wants all employees joining after 31 March 2010 to be covered by the new scheme. Managed by professional fund managers, the pension under the new scheme will depend on the performance of the pension fund.

anup.r@livemint.com

Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
PRADEEP Said:


SIR, AS YOU KNOW THAT BURDEN ON BANK STAFF OF ALL POSITIONS ARE VERY HIGH . SO GOVT MUST BE QUICK TO LISTEN & TAKE ACTION FOR THE MAXIMUM BENEFIT OF THE BANK EMP. & OFFICERS--PRADEEP

Posted On 7/14/2009 10:59:55 PM
subbaraoperi Said:


Sir, The acciuntability and the work load to officers in particular and others in general is stupendous.Generall officers work for more than 9 to 10 hours.In bkg industry work has to be finished on dy to day basis.You cant postpone.They deserve if not better on par 6th pay commission.

Posted On 7/15/2009 12:29:33 PM
ravi Said:


if govt wants to increase by 13 or 15% only then governmant should show the courage to offer VRS open for all the employees. This will give us opportunity to exit from the present situation of inhuman working condition and those who wll be left government may offre 5% also no prblem.

Posted On 7/15/2009 3:47:39 PM
ravinder Said:


Bankers dont need any wage revision and do not expect any handsome increase in their salaries. Now a days Banks are fastly emerging as a Government Sponsored exploitation centeres headed by govt appointed CMDs. A new type of slavery is coming in to existence in banking.Every Bank officer is being exploited by showing the fear of Transfer , inquiry etc.So slaves dont need any wage revision. The job is a neccessity to fill our and our childrens stomach which is important than wage revision.

Posted On 7/16/2009 10:22:48 AM
Bhuvarahan Said:


It is 100% true that bank employees are being exploited to the hilt. Newspapers dont write on how CMDs deal with their Senior Officers leave alone the junior staff. I would put the blame squarely on the Associations which have failed to protect the rights of the staff. Is it not true that reimbursements of conveyance allowance/ newspapers and what not have been stopped without any rhyme or reason and the Bank Unions simply watched it for one CMD to leave and beg the incoming CMD for restoring partially the benefits. PLEASE DO SOMETHING TO MAKE THE ASSOCIATIONS TRUELY ACTIVE.

Posted On 7/17/2009 1:34:49 PM
Re: Ram Said:


Till the retired staff remains on the leadership of the bank unions,bank officers and employees will suffer like anything. this is the beginning. See what they bring in future. Don't you sense that they are willing maximum benefit for retired bank staff on the cost of working staff. As such Goct stand is correct. This is the working staff who is befooled by the retired union leaders.

Posted On 7/25/2009 9:38:47 AM
Santan Said:


The work load on the bank staff keeps on increasing day by day. I was a bank employee of Bank of Baroda, who was victimised by the cruel and anti employee attitude of the management. The Bank unions have no guts and have turned slaves at the hands of the management. Myself being a Steno/typist, worked in Admn Office for 30 years, was posted 70 kms away from my residence at a rural branch, where no post of a Steno/typist existed. Isn't this harrasment and mental torture to extract resignatins? Thanks to Bank of Baroda.

Posted On 7/22/2009 10:47:15 AM
Re: Prashant Said:


My dear friend, how can you forget those old days during 70s when militant unions pressed for undue demands and harassed management personnel in Bank of Baroda as well as other nationalised banks taking advantage of the spineless government in power? Every one has to pay for his misdeeds some day or the other. The former CMD of BOB was himself victimised by management and unions who were hand in gloves. It was only during his tenure that Branch Managers of BOB could muster courage and discipline the staff enjoying full backing of management.It was Shri Khandelwal who reminded Branch Heads about their authority coupled with responsibilities. Incidentally, can you imagine a bank employee enjoying his posting at one centre continuously for 30 years in a public sector organisation? And was the transfer against any of the prevailing agreements with unions? Then why shout when you are affected by it? Did you ever utter a single word against contunuing employees at one place in administration continuously beyond 5 years against the government guidelines of job rotation which were applicable to other staff who had no direct personal contact with top level functionaries? Friends, please take a look at ourselves and our deeds taking personal benefits at others' costs. This has only led to management one day taking rational stand and implementing transfer schemes under its powers and which were perfectly within the ambit of prevailing settlements. Now look at the poor customer service rendered at branches in absence of stern management ably led by the former CMD of the bank.

Posted On 8/5/2009 12:19:56 PM
Vinod Said:


The situation is not going to change unless we are ready to ask our leaders to step down as they do not have any interestexcept to live in their comfort zone. If we are ready to work 10 to 12 hours without asking for our legtimate right why will anybody listen. It is the culture of our Government to listen to the needs of the agitative persons only. The more you can damage the more you will get. We need some leader like Mr. Raj Thakarey or Mr. Bensala. Shame on our leaders.....they have become spineless.

Posted On 8/4/2009 9:28:22 PM
savio Said:


Dear banker friends, Historicaly you people contend your wage revision with below 10% hike. Then, how you dare this time to demand for 20% hike. You people are put in darkness by your old aged leaders who have mixed up your wage revision with their pension issues. You are cheated by your union leaders and still you are happy with your shameless leaders. We feel ashamed to see that employees of those Bank's making more than Rs. 10000 crores profits and those at the Bank's making heavy losses are paid same salary and are historically satisfied with worst industry wide settlements arrived between UBFA and IBA. One small advice to dear bankers, plesae don't be envious and jelous to the smart employees at the Central Govt and other PSUs, who had settled their Wage Revision before Congress faced the General Election.

Posted On 8/5/2009 12:14:28 AM
Prashant Said:


The government needs to accept that the employees of PSBs should be adequately compensated for the skills and risks involved in their jobs today; Else, days are not far off when you will see exodus of talented people to private sector and foreign banks. In 1979, the government had accepted the need for parity between the pay packets of bank officers and class 1 government officers as recommended by 'Pillai Committee.' Now today, where does this parity stand? Will the government 'Babus' allow PSBs earning profits to compensate their employees by paying salaries more than what these Babus earn? Then at least why not allow parity in pay hike? The political wing of the government needs to take a comprehensive view of these issues before succumbing to their secretaries in deciding the matter. When IBA was ready for 17 percent hike and sharing of additional burden due to another option for pension, what was the hitch for them? I would say that all the stakeholders have a share in profits earned by bank. While government and shareholders can stake claim to their shres, allow employees their due share in profit. Will the political government show its courage to allow IBA and unions settle the issue on its merits rather than mingling into their affairs on the advice of burocracy? Please vaoid the strike at ANY COST, else be ready to face the poilitical consequences of the issues.

Posted On 8/5/2009 12:31:33 PM
amresh Said:


Who Cares for the bank employees when the government officails denying hike to employees got the best deal just before the election . Had it not been for the alleged indulgenc eof unions bank employees too could have struck it hard before the elections to bargain a better deal. Irony is Govt doesn't blink twice before awarding 40-50% hike to dept incurring losses or not even generating revenues , while banker demanding a share from the profit(42k crores) are dealt with a tough hand. Will somebody ask why this discrimination. The standing of a bank officails has been reduced to the level of a peon and people are mocking ...

Posted On 9/25/2009 9:53:33 AM