Log has written
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009

To understand a culture we must examine its classical roots. No real understanding of Europe or Europeans is possible without understanding Western classical music. In his autobiographical novel Youth, Nobel Prize winner J.M. Coetzee writes of his first encounter with Hindustani music. It comes as he watches Satyajit Ray’s Apu trilogy on successive nights in London. “Hitherto he has found in Western music, in Bach above all, everything he needs,” writes Coetzee, “Now he encounters something that is not in Bach.” And what is this that he discovers in Hindustani music? “A joyous yielding of the reasoning, comprehending mind.”

Hub of harmony: Symphony Orchestra of India performing at NCPA, Mumbai. Abhijit Bhatlekar / Mint

Hub of harmony: Symphony Orchestra of India performing at NCPA, Mumbai. Abhijit Bhatlekar / Mint

He buys a record by Vilayat Khan and it is consistent with the film’s music. He finds the same “hovering exploration of tone sequences, the quivering emotion, the ecstatic rushes... A new continent...”

Coetzee has access to a new culture through this music. It communicates what Western music does not. The question is: How?

Hindustani music is unique in two ways. One: It operates without one of the three elements of music, harmony. It is rich in melody and rhythm but does not harmonize two separate melodies. Because of this, Hindustani music is always a monologue. The singer, or sitar player, as in Pather Panchali, offers an individual’s expression. This makes Hindustani music introverted, giving it the qualities Coetzee discovers. The reasoning mind is set aside because one man does not reason with himself. If not reason, what does Hindustani communicate to its audience? The answer is: Emotion. And it does this especially efficiently for those of us who respond to the culture. One of the few times I feel religious is when I listen to the 36-year-old Jasraj’s muscular ode to Hanuman in Hamsadhwani, on his first LP from 1966.

Two: The primary theme of Hindustani music is melancholy, and loss. There is no optimism in it, and no army ever marched to dhrupad or khayal. Wagner moved Hitler to annex the Sudetenland, and Carl Orff’s O Fortuna makes me want to do the same. Hindustani makes us retreat within ourselves. But it is a melancholy that we are comforted by. The music I go to after having a few is always Hindustani: Aamir Khan (the other one) moving magisterially through Anandi Kalyan, or Rashid Khan, at a higher pitch, more pleading, in Bageshri.

Also Read Aakar’s previous Lounge columns

Europe’s classical music is trying for us to listen to, and very few Indians like it.

READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Fakery Said:


Does anyone else share my sense of outrage after reading this article? The insinuations, the generalizations, etc. seem outright demagogic, even racist. As if only Parsis and Catholics (in India) get harmony and the others don't. That Bandra's core is unavailable to non-Catholics, shouldn'ht that be an outrage too? And so on. Perhaps the simpler answer why Parsis (and Catholics) live Western classical music lies elsewhere. An identification with the white-skinned Westerner than with the culture and traditions that host them and their kin. A disgrace a mouth like the writer's is given voice in Mint.com

Posted On 7/18/2009 3:40:19 AM
Re: Firo Said:


It is your comments about Parsi's ( and Catholics )that are insulting and racist, and should spark outrage. The Parsi contribution to the nation has been incredible, and far out of proportion to their microscopic number's. It was the Parsi's who were the first to beat the British at their own game, in building ships, running banks, international trade, making steel, etc. You may not agree with Aakar's view's about music, but please study some history before passing such comments.

Posted On 7/25/2009 5:01:16 PM
ambuga Said:


I fail to understand the lament of the author that 'western classical music' has few takers in India.The question is ,in part,self answering.It is because it is western-alien to India.I wonder if any commentator in Germany or Britain would ask why Indian classical music has not found it's roots in Europe?.Classical music everywhere is on the wane.I wonder if the author has given any thought as to why Indian classical music itself has become ,for most part,a preserve of the Geriatric population?Bandra and South Mumbai have been the hubs of the affluent-affluent who could afford to indulge in the arts.It's got little to do with harmony or civilization,something as specious as saying that south Indian Bramhins who mostly dominate the carnatic arena are more civilized and disciplined than others. .

Posted On 7/18/2009 6:07:26 PM
Aniruddha Said:


This is strikingly written but highly dubious. Firstly, its an old and untenable musicological cliche that Hindustani classical (I won't venture into Carnatic knowing far less about it) is entirely monophonic and about 'individual' expression. Sans harmony, there can still be heterophony and simultaneity - in Hindustani ... Lire la suiteone talks about the 'lipatna' between tabla bols and the melodic line, for instance; something like sawal-jawab but far more intertwined in elaboration. Dialogue and synchronous elaboration can also, of course, happen between two melodists (like a singer and his/her accompanist) as well... All this points to the existence of a highly complex variety of communicative reason in the music, and not the (essentialist and highly problematic) idea that 'emotion' prevails over reason. Secondly, no genre of music is necessarily or predominantly melancholic... what about the joy and flamboyance evidenced in many acrobatic taans for instance? Overall, I feel that the comparative lack of appreciation for 'Western classical' (itself a vague and retrospectively consolidated category) in India is not about essential cultural differences but might have more to do with sociological and market factors. There are so many genres of music to choose from already... perhaps the space for 'Western Classical' has not really been found, except through indirect but highly visible influences like the universal use of 'western'-style orchestras and harmony in Hindi film music right from the 30s/40s onward!

Posted On 7/18/2009 6:25:10 PM
Francois Said:


Highly frustrating article! The question is asked several times, but what's the answer?

Posted On 7/19/2009 1:26:57 PM
Brownnoser Said:


How can I listen to someone who, in earnestness, claims Bandra and South Mumbai are the most civiilized parts of India? By what metric is that claim made and what does it reveal of author's biases and prejudices? By that token Mylapore, Pune, Gwalior and various other centers of Indian classical music, leave alone the rest of India, are to be dismissed for they aren't civilized enough, cultured enough, Westernised enough....for Mr Patel. Long resident in Palo Alto, having graduated from IIT-Mumbai and very familiar with all of those cities and neighborhoods mentioned above I must admit I spot a brown-nosing brownie condescending to the culture and people that host him and his family and aspiring to be in a Western culture (which for all its merits, will dismiss him for the brown-noser that he is!)

Posted On 7/20/2009 12:09:11 AM
Nick Said:


Maybe this is the only way he can gain the accolades of his western masters.......I wonder at the inferiority complex these journalists suffer from......they seem so ashamed of everything so remotely traditional to India. My question is- WHY STAY HERE IF ITS SO BAD? we dont need the likes of you. And yes.. you can take Ms. Ramani along for company if and when you wish to.

Posted On 7/20/2009 5:15:16 PM
Dsylex Said:


aakar patel is the new sashi tharoor.banal and brown nosed

Posted On 8/1/2009 7:25:11 PM
Anjum Said:


I enjoyed this article because it triggered a number of hypotheses that one can follow up at leisure. There is a fundamental difference between Western and Indian classical music and exploring that helps better understand some structural aspects of the respective societies. I have taken an idiosyncratic look at that (without reference to Parsis) using Goethe's quote as a peg: "I call architecture frozen music." http://thesouthasianidea.wordpress.com/2009/08/02/an-idiot’s-guide-to-music-–-1/ Of course, there remains a lot more to explore about the musical traditions. On Parsis, it is interesting that from Ramachandra Guha's book on cricket one learns that they were also the first to take up the game in India. A simple explanation could just be that they were the elite at that time and the first adopters of all aspects of modernity. And perhaps, they were not so deeply rooted in Indian culture as to find the adaptations impossible - the typical retreat of the Indian into his or her own very rich traditions, especially in the arts.

Posted On 8/4/2009 3:50:52 PM
Shiva Said:


Aakar patel... First of all... U are highly biased and ur comments are really racist without any base. In a nutshell U say indirectly that Hindus are less civilized and savage... I'm sure U have friends in high places... esp anti-Hindus with whose backing U are spouting such venom...

Posted On 8/13/2009 6:52:02 PM
Prostetnic Said:


Aakar Patel, WHY do you wish to annex the Sudetenland while listening to O, Fortuna? Could you please tell me? This question has been tormenting me for a long time.

Posted On 8/31/2009 12:33:07 AM
Casual Said:


Mr. Aakar's lament reads uncannily like Matthew Arnold's impassioned outcry against the Philistines who had no place for the sweetness and (especially interesting) harmony of the Hellenic traditions. Just that he loathed barbaric inclinations in the same Victorians that Mr Aakar must find very difficult to critically weigh against the countrymen whose indegenous traditions he uniformally dismisses.

Posted On 9/16/2009 12:11:23 PM