Log has written
FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2009

Last week, I read an insightful report by executive search firm Korn/Ferry on officers from the defence forces joining the corporate world. The study revealed that officers brought unique elements from the combat zone into business competition.

A vast majority of officers and men leave with at least two decades of productive careers still ahead of them. Most countries have learnt to exploit this incredible resource, and India is fast catching up. The Indian Army discharges approximately 1,500 officers every year. They range from short-service officers, with about seven years of experience, to those who have completed their pensionable service of around 20 years and are in their 40s.

Some years ago, the army ran an advertising campaign on the exciting life of a combat soldier. It showed an officer barely into his 20s, commanding a tank squadron (1,500 horsepower company car), parachuting from an aeroplane (company jet) and leading a raid into enemy territory (foreign travel). That is just the tip of the iceberg. There are few professions, which hold leaders responsible for the lives of the men under their command, or where they have to lead men into death without ESOPs (employee stock ownership plan), pay hikes or performance bonuses. Also, there is no other profession where men love (or hate) their leaders with such passionate fervour. Where one learns that there are no good units or bad units, just good or bad leaders. Where errors of judgement leave widows and orphans in their wake. This excellent grounding helps officers fit five basic role profiles.

The first is administration. During a typical career, an officer performs the role of managing resources and equipment worth several hundred crores. He is responsible for the well-being and training of his men, planning logistics, controlling deployment and coordinating exercises with other units and services. And he would be adept in process development with a keen sense of what could go wrong.

The second role flows from these experiences into HR and man management. During service, an officer is held accountable for the well-being of his men and their families. He is required to know what makes them tick, their individual strengths, weaknesses and vulnerabilities. Good units groom their officers to know each soldier by his name, learn the language of the troops he commands and motivate them in a manner that they best respond to. He literally has to get inside their heads and skins, and realize that every soldier is an individual, with individual problems and aspirations. Operations is another role where officers take like duck to water. They have spent years executing and making seemingly impossible plans happen. Their ability to multitask, high levels of energy and “can do” attitude makes them excellent operations and project managers. India’s telecom revolution owes a lot to hundreds of signals officers, who helped roll out the grid that connects our country.

Security is a natural extension, ranging from physical and electronic security to high-end specialized roles such as counter-intelligence, fraud investigation, close protection of high value assets, disaster and crisis management. Combat hones a sixth sense of perception and gives them an ability to be cool, calm and composed even in the face of extraordinary crisis.

The last role where many officers have proved their mettle is the holy grail of wealth creation. They have successfully founded and led companies in sectors ranging from consulting to retail. James McKinsey was an army officer and so was Sam Walton. Closer home, defence officers have headed business units, political ministries, and channels. They have been leading correspondents, authors, entrepreneurs, social activists, administrators and thought leaders. The largest real estate developer and the harbinger of affordable airlines in India have both been defence forces officers.

With a decade in the army and the corporate world, I identify with much of this. But the hypothesis remains incomplete without highlighting where defence officers struggle in making the switch—from a cocooned life in the services to the competitiveness of the corporate environment.

First, is finance. In the services, officers learn to optimize the resources for output—but seldom visit the basic rules of finance and worry about rates of return on investment, a skill that is essential to handling P&L (profit and loss account) responsibilities. Next, overbearing hierarchy is an operational requirement in the forces. In the corporate world, this can lead to a group of “yes men”—convenient but not optimal. In his able lieutenants, every senior corporate leader looks for courage that will allow them to speak their mind. Much of the effort has to be put in by reporting seniors—who will let the career service officer realize that challenging a superior is not tantamount to indiscipline.

Marketing and business development also strike me as gaps. But these have less critical implications for most businesses. The defence ministry and several business schools are working to overcome these skill gaps through programmes for officers.

All said and done, it is hard to replace men who have mettle and a winning attitude. I am reminded of an army officer, who was asked one of those favourite interview questions by a business tycoon, “So, what has been the greatest challenge of your life?” The officer reflected for a few moments and said matter-of-factly, “Well, people had been trying to kill me and my men, you know. I guess just surviving with my men, alive, was a challenge alright.” Here’s to old soldiers, who never die!

Raghu Raman is chief executive of corporate risk consulting firm Mahindra Special Services Group that advises companies and organizations on threat assessments and risk mitigation strategies. Respond to this fortnightly column at crosshairs@livemint.com

Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
abhay Said:


Dear Mahindra Congrats for highlighting the loyalty, sincerity, punctuality, test skill, commitment posses by the armed force personnel which they acquired over period of the time in the adverse situation under dynamic leadership of boss. Certainly it will give second thought to the corporate personnel to have look in. they have prove mettle and a winning attitude whenever given opportunity and responsibility .

Posted On 8/28/2009 7:15:05 AM
vinay Said:


A very aptly written article. It greatly provides the insight into the working culture of armed forces and the immense potential of army officers. Rightly so, there is a need to be more cost consciousness in the army. Another field where army officers are making mark is the field of 'Project Management' which is the order of present day infrastructure development. God bless the army men who are nothing but the best

Posted On 8/28/2009 5:41:38 PM
anupama Said:


Its heartning to see that officer as a " complete pacakage" is recognised.They know the nitty gritties of all aspects from "cocktail to cockpit" .......

Posted On 8/28/2009 9:12:48 PM
Cedric Said:


Dear Raghu, A very apt article. Another point I want to highlight is our exposure, in terms of Geography, Types of Jobs and People. Having served the length and breath of the Country in various appointments and having dealt with simpletons to rogues people from North to South or East to West was indeed a challenging but enriching experience.

Posted On 8/29/2009 11:53:08 AM
sanjay Said:


A well conceived and thought out article which can open some closed minds in the corporate about the defence officers, if read in the right spirit. Not much is known about the armed forces in the outside world except that they are physically fit , fire well and party hard but nobody no knows and has even tried to know what goes behind the scene and how the units, brigades and divisions are run and wars are fought and how meticulously planning is carried out for even a small event, leave apart a battle or war and why partying is important as well.The most important facet of the army officer is the multi tasker which is the one lacking in the corporate world. Many in their CVs write that they are multi taskers but they need to take a lesson or two from the armed forces of what a multi tasker is all about. I have been involved in Project management and Operations in corporate for last two and a half years and feel that an armed forces officer suits the best in both these fields . let's not make them only admin, security or HR guys. There is much more in an army man than what is exploited till date. Cheers!!!

Posted On 8/29/2009 5:51:34 PM
Indra Said:


I cannot agree more with Raghu and others and would like to add a few more. I am now looking at absorption of armed forces officers at strategic level. Though it’s not the best to start on a negative note but I prefer to first talk about some weaknesses that act as impediments to full realisation of their potential in the corporate world. I agree with Raghu that most armed forces officers would too readily agree to opinions/suggestions of superiors without challenging it even if they felt otherwise. Within the forces this saves time and helps quick decision making in battle front where split second decisions can be critical. However, in the corporate world this readyness, I presume, would be taken as subservience and lack of intellectual capacity. Secondly, the officers tend to get personal and overtly passionate about their tasks and view points in a discussion. Such discussions loose the constructive purpose of finding an optimal solution and heads into “my last word” syndrome. Likewise officers in uniform tend to exhibit uncalled-for exuberance and readiness to accept challenges and tasks without fully analysing it. In other words the tolerance for ambiguity is very high. It’s a good quality within the forces since its a cohesive organisation with single purpose commitment by all towards the goal; once a decision is taken. In the corporate world it is very different. Not all would lend support to this gentle person’s exuberance unless they are reasonably convinced of its usefulness and feasibility. The armed forces officers have to also to learn to harness support of the group by giving a superior plan rather than on the strength of their superior position. These weaknesses do get offset by some very discernable strengths exhibited by officers who have spent a full career in uniform. The ability to perceive an opportunity’s strategic, operational as well as tactical significance is to my mind a very unique talent possessed by officers in the senior bracket.

Posted On 9/1/2009 1:22:04 PM
sanjay Said:


thanx for simplifying the mystique of faujis`...u could add the facets of clarity of vision..firm decision making against obvious odds..stretching subordinates jussst that much more to optimize output..keeping in touch with first commanding officers..and many oter retired men of honour..( without anny expectations )..giving hte job the very sincere best despite facing an obvious very narrow pyramid of promotions............all the fancy corporate salaries can not buy....WILLING LOYALTY..as displayed by men in uniform..take care n thanx for the good words

Posted On 9/1/2009 9:39:03 PM
Mahip Said:


Great Article--I must tell you of this unauthenticated story i heard about a young one eyed Capt who accosted the visiting General who was lecturing on career planning. Sir what is my future-I lost an eye on duty. Very apologetically --Son -I know your basic apprehension--we will make you a Major! Why stop there-actually my firing has improved -i do not have to close my eye and now i am a marksman! I am also very fit physically and as I go up the promotion ladder-I will not be required to demonstrate my physical prowress!So why stop my promotions? General--Ok I get your point-you have given this challenging point to a Bengali officer and I will come back to you on this! Capt- then ,in all fairness -let me tell you Sir,it was a bengali officer who gave you the problem in the first case!

Posted On 9/6/2009 9:09:18 AM