Logwritten
SUNDAY, MARCH 14, 2010 3:05 PM IST

The consolidated results of Tata Motors Ltd for the year ended March were a rude awakening for the markets, with the stock correcting almost 15% in the two trading sessions that followed. The firm’s shares have risen by 68% since, and so are ripe for another reality check. Jaguar-Land Rover (JLR) has reported another hefty loss of around $200 million (Rs978 crore) before tax and a notional forex gain, and this should be a cause of concern for the markets, that have primarily focused on improved conditions in the domestic market.

The saving grace is that the results are better compared with the January-March quarter, with the firm’s volumes rising by about 10%. While there are no comparable profit numbers for the March quarter, the firm has said the results are better on a quarter-on-quarter (q-o-q) basis because of manufacturing efficiencies, headcount reduction and improvement in working capital.

But the major worrying factor is that retail sales of JLR (different from the company’s factory sales) have been flat q-o-q, with an improvement in some markets such as China and North America being offset by sharp declines in the UK and Russia. While the company is improving efficiency and cutting costs wherever possible, it desperately needs volumes to pick up to near break-even levels. As Ravi Kant, vice-chairman of the company, stated at the press conference to announce the results, “We need help from the markets.”

Meanwhile, a dangerous combination of low capacity utilization and high product development spending are resulting in high cash burn at JLR. JLR’s results between June 2008 and March worked out to an annualized cash burn of around $1.6 billion. Based on the June quarter results alone, the annualized cash burn works out to over $1.7 billion. This is after accounting for product development expenses of around $240 million and normal capital expenditure of $100 million. Note that the acquisition debt sits on the books of a special purpose vehicle and so actual cash burn would be even higher, after accounting for the related interest cost.

At this rate, Tata Motors would need to continue raising capital, and investors should be worried about further value destruction.

Write to us at marktomarket@livemint.com

 
Manu Said:


Only one destiny beckons TATA, become like Suzuki and make JLR like one. Diversify products into trucks (Rover Heavy Duty Trucks competing with CAT, earthmovers, etc. along with commercial freightliners), hatch backs (Jaguar - Hatchbacks to compete in price ranges of Alfa Romeo, Toyota, Honda, Ford in the EU market) and by introducing electric vehicles in EU and US to compete with similar products of Chevy. High nosed and high prestige category can not help JLR sustain as there is no replacement of the Germans (Mercedes, AUDI, BMW and VWs). JLR might have a niche, but niches do not sustain and are fated to die a quiet death like the Ford Mustang (a miracle survivor after the 1908s pollution deathknell), Dodge, Pontiac, etc. TATAs need to take lessons from their own market back home and diversify to such an extent that they sell the Jaguar as cheap as VW Jetta, and Honda Accord!!! Plus outsourcing is also an answer, but there were certain restrictive clauses in the takeover, as I remember rightly. So that is out of question as of now. I sure am all appreciative of Ford the way its come around by dumping JLR and the foolishness of TATAs to have purchased JLR in 2008. Come 2009 they wud have mopped it up in pieces at their desired quotes!!! No wonder Ford, with its business acumen has survived 2 World Wars and one Great Depression and now this Second Depression, despite making trash cars without fuel economy, presentability, or resale value!!! Sadly so TATAs are better car makers but base their takeovers on emotions. Success is the right thing at the right time... isn't it true?!

Posted On 9/1/2009 12:04:05 AM