Logwritten
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009 11:20 AM IST

Vir Sanghvi recently described the political turmoil in the BJP as a colonels’ coup, with the party’s middle echelon ejecting its senior officers. A change of guard does seem to be in the offing: The RSS has intervened to speed up the superannuation of the Jan Sangh gerontocrats, L.K. Advani and Murli Manohar Joshi, and to manage the transition to a younger generation of bigots. The party’s rout in the recent elections has weakened its ability to resist Nagpur’s meddling or to preserve the fig leaf of functional autonomy, and defeat has made it easier to purge the old men who failed to deliver Hindutva’s holy grail, the state.

Trump card: Will Modi alienate the undecided voter? PTI

Trump card: Will Modi alienate the undecided voter? PTI

The fascinating thing about this process is the speed with which the party’s anglophone intellectuals have abandoned their erstwhile friends and patrons. Sudheendra Kulkarni has jumped ship, Swapan Dasgupta has turned on Advani, his erstwhile hero, out of a principled concern for the greater good of the party and Arun Shourie, who thinks on the grand scale, presciently urged the RSS to nuke the party’s ruling establishment and set its house in order.

Shourie is an interesting figure: an ideologue whose persona fuses intemperate polemic with mincing rectitude. He’s unique: There isn’t a person I can think of in contemporary politics who has been a crusading editor, a civil rights activist, a votary of the “hard” state, a forceful minister, a majoritarian demagogue and an inexhaustible compiler of albums of quotations glazed with rage and published as books.

If the BJP was brighter and Shourie less angular, he would be that party’s Manmohan Singh, its Mr Integrity: the foreign-returned, World Bank alum determined to globalize India, the arch modernizer with the middle class credibility to make majoritarianism India’s common sense. The fact that he doesn’t have an electoral base isn’t important: Manmohan Singh has shown us what a Rajya Sabha MP can do. With Vajpayee retired and Advani in the doghouse, the BJP sometimes seems like a party of provincials and operators: Shourie at the helm would have given it the semblance of a fierce, metropolitan respectability.

Also Read Mukul’s previous Lounge columns

But this is unlikely to happen not least because Shourie carries so much published baggage. His book-length attempt to exhume Ambedkar the better to shred his reputation would be a liability in a political world where Ambedkar counts for more than Gandhi or Nehru. So the role he seems to see himself playing is that of the conscience keeper of the Hindu right and, should it capture the state, the guardian of the republic’s morals.

READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Aryan Said:


the writer works for jamia milia islamia university, perhaps he felt he wasnt being secular enough, so the rant against Modi.

Posted On 9/17/2009 9:44:43 PM
Re: Ramesh Said:


Is he? O what a poor condition of a HIndu in India ! He is required to revile at Modi so that he could prove that he is Hindu just for namesake to become the darling of the management and its dominant Muslim students.This is the institution of Batala fame

Posted On 9/18/2009 2:35:56 AM
Re: ali Said:


Dear Ramesh and Aryan, You might have read his articles against Muslim fundamentalists. Being Hindu doesn't mean that you should be a devotee of Mr. Modi. Sameway, I see a lot of Ramesh and Aryan among Muslims too, they feel hating Hindus can make them better Muslims. Have you heard about Prof. Mushihur Hassan, From Jamia, he was targetted by Muslim fundamentalists for being Anti-Muslim. So, for God's sake don't make our country , a counrty of fanatics. Best wishes, A

Posted On 9/18/2009 8:26:42 AM
Re: Prince Said:


Shame on livemint to publish this garbage! Its parent WSJ is a GREAT publication with rational and balanced opinion journal. Live mint in contrast sounds like is hijacked by muslim apologists and communists like rest of the english media in india.

Posted On 9/18/2009 8:52:32 PM
Rajeev Said:


what a stupid article.

Posted On 9/17/2009 10:41:27 PM
abby Said:


Nonsense. Utter nonsense like how Shourie would say. ;) So these are the people protecting secularism? They come across as hardliners themselves!

Posted On 9/18/2009 1:28:10 AM
Ramesh Said:


First how can you call Gujrat riots as pogrom when 33 per cent of killed were Hindus? Why only the killing the Muslims is brought out and the killing of Hindus is ignored.Are Hindus are of lesser God?Pogrom was the killing of Sikhs in 1984 riots when not a single non-sikh was killed.Yet Rajiv Gandhi who presided over ( if Presiding over a riot is a crime) this pogrom continued to be darling of the masses and won 450 seats and why can not MOdi win? Perhaps you are trying to say that Muslima are a fictious minority decisively tilting the scalses in election while the real minority like Sikhs( if they do not like to be called Hindus) can not influence the voting pattern.Our contry is flooded with Muslimphilic and while Arun Shourie is angular( why did you not used better word unbending) because he was influenced by Arya Samaj , you seem to be repaying more than you got from a Muslim institution and perhaps a lot of surreptiously given petrodollars

Posted On 9/18/2009 2:52:35 AM
Ramesh Said:


Give me one good reason why I should care what someone who works at jamia millia islamia says about Shri Modi.

Posted On 9/18/2009 3:09:14 AM
Shan Said:


Who the hell is Mukul Kesavan? another confused so called Hindu? or a muslim in disguise. Well you certainly are a disgrace for Hindus and Indians. Look at the track record of Modi and then comment. Gujarat is the only state which is booming and it is envy for rest of India, being a non-Gujarathi I salute Modi for his achievements. So it really doest not matter if you criticize Modi to gain undue cheap attention, because the last thing Narendra Modi need is praise from people like you. Narendra Modi is a winner, so stop writing crap in paper. Get a life!

Posted On 9/18/2009 3:49:25 AM
PA Said:


After wasting so many words, writer has no juice in his statement. He seems in favor of " guilty without prosecution". He borrows allegations from other English media, ignores other side of facts and serves his hidden masters.He wants us believe in his agenda without question.

Posted On 9/18/2009 5:06:39 AM
Ranganathan Said:


there is no connection between the body of the article and its headlines , thank god the columinist's ability is limited to writing no more than 3 paragrahs for a column.Strongly advise him to join a journalism school or get apprenticed with Arun Shourie

Posted On 9/18/2009 5:12:16 AM
Jagdish Said:


This chap Mukul Keshavan should think twice before penning even a sinle line. Mr. Narendra Mody is a true nationaist unlike UPA psedo secularists and a handful of Indian citizens loyal to India's enemy. We need more narendra Modis. Keshavan, better keep mum. Thanks.

Posted On 9/18/2009 5:39:30 AM
Dharm Said:


If Modi is bad, was Rajiv Gandhi good to oversee and quasi-justify the pogrom against the Sikhs in 1984? Can we let his progeny rule? Indira also inflicted political violence on innocent activist during emergency. Didn't we allow her a second chance in 1980 after having presided over 'violent pogroms and political cleansing? The author, as informed he seems from his rather verbose analysis of current-day politics, may want to introspect on two counts: 1. India needs a media and commentrators who are unbiased. By reminding the readers of only Gujarat without mention of Delhi simply dilutes objectivity and neutrality 2. India needs more security for its people than sermons on secularism. Post 2002, Gujarat has suffered relatively less from terrorism, and witnessed healthy and proportional growth in minority population, as compared to other states of comparable size and development index Let me end by cautioning the nation on what would happen if any of the Nehru-Gandhi progeny ascends to the throne, which is being kept warm by a learned gentleman - India will revert back to having the infamous and anemic 'Hindu' rate of growth. No one's forgotten the intellectual and monetary enslavement of the poor inflicted by the 'Garibi Hatao' slogans and the same is being repeated under NREGA. One can already see the tamasha of austerity drive when the the Prince charming spends Rs. 1cr on a 2-day political sojourn, and the ministers are busy getting fat in corrupt money. I'd rather see a Hindu India with more security and opportunities for growth for the minorities guaranteed by a known devil - Mr. Modi - than emerge as a perpetually servile and underachieving nation full of hypocrits. We need to move on from the Nehruvian model to the one espoused by China, Singapore, UAE, and USA that are perfect examples of enrichment of all despite the namesake demographic domination of a few.

Posted On 9/18/2009 7:04:49 AM
Danesh Said:


Whenever there is an article on Modi, 90% of letter-writers support Modi. We need more Modis to counteract HIndu-haters like Sonia Mano, Manmohan and the whole gang of UPA. The lava of Hindu anger will sweep away these enemies and also traitors within like Kesavan. Just watch. --Danesh Patel

Posted On 9/18/2009 7:31:22 AM
raghu Said:


the writer seems to have concern about Modi having presided over the ethnic cleansing in gujarat. No prooof is provided. IF this he does become PM then he is in good company. Rajiv gandhi presided over the killing of 300 sikhs in Delhi the country did not mind it. He was PM when it happened and Modi was CM when the riots took place. So where is the Logic In Kashmir The Abdullahs and the people who followed have witnessed theethnic cleansing of non-muslims So where is the concern? are Muslims lives more dearer than Non-muslsim lives the writer need to go back to school and get re-educated about logic . We seem in India afraid to criticize if muslims kill non-muslims i suppose it is called secular where as killing muslims as has happened is called ethnic cleansing I dont know what world we are living in It is important to call a spade a spade raghu NY USA

Posted On 9/18/2009 7:59:59 AM
Tushar Said:


1. There have been more leaders who have ALLEGED to have led violent pograms against other religions / sects. In spite of they have thrived. Look at Delhi, Hyderabad, Tamil Nadu. No one says that their leadership threatens India..... Why? 2. Why does author overlook that Modi is one of the best performing CMs in India. 3. CPM, RJD keep quoting that the very fact that they are voted back to power vindicates their stand. (Others including media accepts it through silence) Why same rule does not apply to Modi?

Posted On 9/18/2009 8:01:56 AM
Sumita Said:


We already sanctioned the Gujarat pogrom when the Delhi 1984 anti-Sikh one had state approval and we continued to vote for the Gandhis and the Congress. The point is that every party has blood on their hands. Its not a BJP vs Congress issue at all, its the quality of politics in this country that needs an overhaul. Unfortunately, there was no live TV coverage of the 84 trauma inflicted on hapless citizens in the CAPITAL of the country for FOUR days. Please read the PUCL-PUDR report on this http://www.pucl.org/Topics/Religion-communalism/2003/who-are-guilty.htm Thanks

Posted On 9/18/2009 9:03:44 AM
SAM Said:


Sad analysis, and sad title just self fulfiling for the author! How many times the media has raked in the issue of Godhra train? '87 riots in UP and many umpteen riots. This is nt to justify what happened in Gujaat, bu yes probably except that incidet nothing bad hs happened in Gujarat whih has grown considerably under him. I am sure if Modi is the man chosen for fuure, then definitely his 5 years would be thaousand times better in governance and adminisrtion of last 60 years. You take my words. What when people in 10- 20- or in 100s are dying in vaious small bomb blasts etc? Why not then an icon is picked and taken totask like Modi? Because english educated Indan media has stll not absorbed a strong leader like Modi at helm.I fars of unknown....It can admire Indira or Raeev but it fears Vajpayees ad Modis...Long live democracy ....long live hypocracy!!!

Posted On 9/18/2009 9:12:17 AM
Pradeep Said:


Serioiusly, using flamboyant words doesn't add credibility to a baseless article. Content trumps over nebulous language any day. The content is completely vagrant and does not even correlate to the heading. It's shameful that such ludicrous articles make it to the front page of a leading financial daily. So for the uninitiated - is this a Modi bashing or a Shourie praising ?

Posted On 9/18/2009 9:48:56 AM
Venkatesh Said:


Well said Ali, i really support you on your statement. But does Mukul makes sense on his view? Isn't Gujarat part of India and don't non-Hindus reside there? Gujarat is one of the leading & prosperous state in India and if an able administrator of Modi type leads India, then it should be good news for India & Indians and not as mentioned in the article. Modi is bad news for both, the BJP and India doesnt make sense - looks like Mukul has other reasons for hatred towards Modi.

Posted On 9/18/2009 10:16:09 AM
Tamil Said:


Shri.Modi has done a commendable job in Gujarat and if he becomes PM it will lead India to over all development and prosperity...Unlike our politicians Shri.Modi is not having any family, he is totally devoted himself for our country...I see my great leader late shri.Kamaraj in MR.N.Modi.

Posted On 9/18/2009 10:48:38 AM
chena Said:


Modi is the only hope for a strong and fit India - Congress and its cronies have showed how timid India is to the rest of world - Mukul Kesvan's favorite nation Pakistan has attacked us repeatedly and MM singh and co, have done nothing Australia has bashed Indian students and MM singh has done nothing - china has been entering India and India has done nothing world knows how timid Indian congress rule is - so, Mr. Kesavan we are happy to have mr. Modi rule India

Posted On 9/18/2009 11:15:29 AM
Eswaran Said:


No matter who wins the next elections, India is not going to benefit very much. the reason: a) no party will be able to single-handedly send 272 or more MPs to Parliament; b) will have 272 or more MPS who concur on placing nation above self/religion/caste/regional interest; c) will have the will to do collective good ; and d) no country of India's size and diversity will ever achieve progress through divisive coalitions

Posted On 9/18/2009 11:16:18 AM
Mohamed Said:


Irrespective of where Ali works or what Ali's religious idology is, Modi is a citizen of a democracy where he is guilty only if convicted by a court. The fact is that the Congress and Sonia in particular has tried everything possible to smear his name. If there was proof of Modi's involvement I assure you that Congress would have had him behind bars. Until Ali finds convincing proof, he has better chance revolving around KABA (short for Kabileshwar) and claiming that he is not paying homage to Kabileshwar or Shiva than trying to say Modi is bad for the BJP or India. All I will say is that he has been great for Gujarat and for Gujarati Muslims. Under Modi's stewardship less Muslims have died per year to riots than previous years. Long Live Modi and muslim homage to the great KABA/Shiva!!!!!

Posted On 9/18/2009 11:29:58 AM
S Said:


The writer of this article is Mr.Mukul who is a professor in a University. If the views of a professor are questioned then it is a matter of grave concern. To make his point clear he has derived support from the statement of Mr. Vir Sanghvi while Prof should have his own. In fact there are some journalists in India who are against development. These journalists live in the company of Mr. Vir Sanghvi and do not like any kind of development. They have chosen Mr. Modi as their main enemy because Mr. Modi has provided roads, transport,electricity to every village and house. He has converted all the sick PSU units in Gujarat into a huge income generating units. Journalists in India are called "persons without responsibility" and are afraid of Modi at the centre because Mr. Modi will convert Air India/Indian Airlines and other sick PSUs into a profit making PSU. Scams and frauds may disappear. Now a word of advice. Mr. Mukul is a learned professor at a University. We should have every respect for him.

Posted On 9/18/2009 11:44:10 AM
hindu Said:


Did not the publisher find a better and useful article to publish ? Oh god save this country. Sheer waste of time reading these kinds of article, expecting articles to be of sense

Posted On 9/18/2009 11:55:20 AM
Nikhiel Said:


India needs a good third front to balance out the Congress and the BJP. The Congress has good foundations in secularism although it has a reputation of being quite corrupt, whereas the BJP's foundations are based on hatred and division based on religion but they have a reputation of being less corrupt and good administrators. We need a third front that will balance out both these parties and foster an atmosphere of democracy and not of dynasty politics or hate politics. The Congress has a lot of excellent young leaders though - J Scindia, R Gandhi, Deora, Pilot, Rane, etc., whereas most of the BJP leadership is very old. It would have been great if Naidu could lead a third front.

Posted On 9/18/2009 12:50:02 PM
Anshuman Said:


an article in bad taste.

Posted On 9/18/2009 12:51:48 PM
Suman Said:


Now it has become fashionable to castigate Narendra Modi in everything. The moot point is that foreign press should be boycotted by the Indian people. When none of the courts indicted Narendra Modi, how can this fellow named Mukul Kesavan, write such utter nonsense. Someone should file a suit against this newspaper and this fellow Mukul. Jai Hind!!

Posted On 9/18/2009 1:14:32 PM
Re: yashesh Said:


totally agree. let the law take it's place before blaming anyone. look at gujarats track record in the last 8 years. other states are trying to emulate what mr modi does. only difference is mr modi is way to fast compared to others when it comes to important decision making that impeded growth in the rest of the states and country. imho.

Posted On 9/18/2009 2:34:51 PM
vsgopalan Said:


It has become a fashion on the part of english journalist to attack hindus and its saviours. Can mukul and vir criticise karunanidhi on his remark on Lord Ram. Obviously there will be a suspicion on these guys who are being patronised by the evil forces and anti nationals. Thanks God almost all readers are against this man.

Posted On 9/18/2009 2:25:04 PM
A Said:


Opposite of what this article says is true. We need more people like Mr. Modi.

Posted On 9/19/2009 12:54:57 AM
Prahlad Said:


I think there is no problem with Mr. Modi. Those who think that Modi is bad then Late Jawaharlal Nehru was more dangerous than Mr. Modi, because during Partition of India in 1947, there were high degree of communal riots and ethnic cleansing took place and Indian people suffered like anything. So, history is very cruel, donot try put blame on a smaller one to hide the bigger one.

Posted On 9/19/2009 1:53:30 PM
NAUTAMI Said:


if the writer wanted to break the record for gaining maximum comments to his article he certainly has touched the right topic cause no one can tolerate anything written against mr narendra modi. we love him, gujarat loves him and its time whole of india did too.

Posted On 9/19/2009 2:05:37 PM
DarthVader Said:


Witness the backlash to your vacuous article Mr Kesavan ! (the term 'article' is of course used in the most liberal sense).While it is exceedingly important for civil society to stand up for the rights of the oppressed,when the wailing and the breast-beating is reserved only for a certain set of people (muslims),there is very little to separate it from grotesque Hypocrisy. Its a different point altogether that you have employed cheap tactics to propagate your hoary accusations - namely using a misleading title ; whereas a more accurate title should have been "Contemporary Goebbelsian Tactics in India - An illustrative example". And quoting Shoma Chaudhry of Tehelka (theyre still around ?!) as a credible source ? I think Hafiz Sayeed of LeT would be less biased.Nevertheless the overwhelming majority of your readers dont give a monkeys toss for your intellectual onanisms in the guise of secularism or whatever 'ism' that you subscribe to.So good luck on your next article !

Posted On 9/19/2009 5:13:59 PM
kiran Said:


excellent article mr kesavan -- do keep your honesty and integrity going! am delighted that you have the courage to depict mr modi for the person he is and have illuminated the dread that any fair-minded and secular indian must feel when confronted with a person like mr modi. am equally happy at your describing mr shourie's shortcomings accurately. these gentlemen are so barricaded in their own sense of self-importance that they would willingly sacrifice other human beings to achieve their own objectives! it is sad that our country and the ideals of secularism that we were born with don't cut any ice with them.

Posted On 9/20/2009 1:20:08 AM
Azeem Said:


Why on Earth do we not realize that 'Either we live together as brothers or die together as fools' (Martin Luther King Jr) is not just a quote but a stark reality for us Indians. We must, of course, be ruthless in crushing terrorism, but by marking a whole community of tens of millions to be crushed (which is the Hindutva agenda, whether they say it explicitly or not) is plain crazy. 10 brain washed terrorists (26/11) showed the havoc we face from such crooks, can you imagine pogroms creating hundreds of thousands of Kasabs? The only answer lies in the good(of all communities) uniting against the evil (of all communities).

Posted On 9/20/2009 3:39:46 AM
Satish Said:


Mukul Kesavan suffers from a typical Indian middle class: a fear of 'what will people say'! Does it matter if Arun Shourie is 'angular' or Narendra Modi black brushed by the secularists many of who have since been found to be liars? Shouldn't we worry about what's good for India and for our society and our children? To compare Arun Shourie with Manmohan Singh is an insult to the former. I can't see Arun Shourie bending the way our PM has. In my humble opinion opinion Arun Shourie is a fearless, honest and intelligent man who will always put my and my country's interest ahead of veerything else. Narendra Modi may be a demagogue but is an honest and capable administrator. Either would make a better PM than the one we have. Finally, please remember Rajiv Gandhi ran a bigger pogrom than Modi, and no one said anything to him. Mukul the world has problems of its own...and so called 'world opinion' is a load of rubbish. Let's do what's good for us

Posted On 9/20/2009 10:30:20 AM
Abdussalaam Said:


This comment is meant for all the secularists reading this article. The feedback comments received on this article is proof enough to realize what a minority Indian secularists are in this country. For every Mukul Kesavan in India, there are a hundred Aryan. So stop trying to convince me that Hindu fundamentalists are a small powerless bunch and I have nothing to fear from them.

Posted On 9/23/2009 6:52:20 PM
SANKARAN Said:


Anybody can allege anything against anybody and make it sound convincing if he/she has the support of the media. For the past 7 years, all Modi's detractors have been trying their level best to establish charges against him and have been consistently failing. Meanwhile, his performance as the chief Minister of Gujarat has been exemplary, with even people like the ex- CPM MP from Kerala, Mr. Abdulla Kutty, himself a Muslim applauding Modi's achievements in terms of development. And it is also significant that there had been not a single political or religious violence in Gujarat after the 2002 riots. And to blame the chief minister for a mass riot does not seem justified.

Posted On 9/26/2009 6:20:07 PM
shaan Said:


Why nobody writes about the Jagdish Tytler, Quattorochi, etc? How is Manmohan Singh secular when his govt closed the cases against Tytler and Quattorochi? How is he not corrupt when his party supplied money to MPs to win the trust vote? Why nobody asks these questions?

Posted On 10/25/2009 1:09:15 AM