Log has written
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009

Although there have been very few profitable years in the lifetime of the global aviation industry in both absolute and relative terms, the industry is indeed going through its toughest year ever. Airlines in India posted cumulative losses of about $2 billion (Rs9,400 crore) in the last fiscal ended March. Air India reportedly lost $1.1 billion on revenue of $3 billion and is expected to lose around $1.2 billion this year too if corrective measures aren’t taken. It is also currently in talks with the government for a bailout. The two largest privately owned competitors also lost money last fiscal: Kingfisher Airlines Ltd lost about $350 million on revenue of $1.1 billion, or about 30%; Jet Airways (India) Ltd lost $209 million on revenue of $2.8 billion, or 7%.

Industry experts have been dissecting and diagnosing the problems and have suggested quick fixes for some of them. Overcapacity, overstaffing, high employee costs, high oil prices, high airport fees and inefficient yield management have been some of the obvious areas examined by these analysts. However, there has been relatively little discussion on a major inefficiency that is also the third biggest cost item on an airline’s expense sheet—distribution.

Also Read Srivatsa Krishna’s earlier columns

From the 1960s through 1980s, global airlines invested in the development of global distribution systems (GDS) such as Sabre in the US and Amadeus in Europe. The low-cost carrier (LCC) business model emerged in the 1980s and 1990s, which, along with other operational efficiencies, leveraged the growth of the Internet to push direct sales through the most efficient online distribution channel. In addition, online travel agents (OTAs) emerged.

At the beginning of the 1990s, reservation and sales expenses as a percentage of sales for airlines in the US hovered at around 20%. With the introduction of initiatives such as Web-only fares and by working with direct-connect technologies such as Orbitz, airlines in the US brought distribution costs down to under 10% of sales in the last few years. However, average GDS booking fee per segment in the same period kept increasing by almost 5% year on year.

Tags - Find More Articles On:
READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Niket Said:


But didn't IXIGO just copy KAYAK..so not sure of the real innovation being spoken about here. If you look at the US market, KAYAK hasn't really been able to kill the OTA's...I guess largely because of their brand equity and unified pre-post sales customer experience.Given the growth of Bing's travel vertical, its just a matter of time before Google enters this game and gulps down all these OTAs and Meta Search providers at one shot.

Posted On 11/2/2009 10:34:49 AM
Online Said:


Pls check your data. Cleartrip, Travelguru and Ezeego1 have less than 400 people each. Yatra has just over 500. Only MMT is well over 600 employees. Also, while i respect Ixigo, they did not do marketing because they didnt raise the money needed!

Posted On 11/2/2009 3:36:50 PM
William Said:


It is interesting that this has taken so long given the huge payouts airlines make to online travel agents today. Perhaps the new order will see online bookings go through the iXiGOs of the world, and offline bookings through the large network of good old travel agencies? Or will the online travel agents carve out a niche of value-added travel advice to remain relevant?

Posted On 11/2/2009 4:09:13 PM
Siddharth Said:


Brilliant collection of statistics Srivatsa. I must say I havent seen such a comprehensive collection of facts and figures. Also, the outline of the evolution of the space is well articulated. Airline Distribution is a complex and controversial topic to discuss because of the actors involved, but agents and intermediaries will definitely need to rework their business model rather than depending on commissions from airlines (which will go one day or the other, just like they are gone for 14 international airlines) ixigo is indeed a remarkable company and I am happy to see them growing organically with their strong product, a small team and big passion for the space. Also, I am not sure how airline incentives will react if someday let's say 30% of their bookings start flowing through this channel. ixigo's biggest challenge seems on how to reach critical mass without marketing spend.

Posted On 11/2/2009 10:58:11 PM
Sanjay Said:


@Niket Kayak can become like iXiGO if it removes links/fares from Orbitz/Expedia etc. from within its main organic search results. That's a major difference in models and leverage provided to airlines vs. distributors. @online According to Key Company Statistics published on http://www.linkedin.com/companies/makemytrip.com and http://www.linkedin.com/companies/yatra the two biggest nd most relevant OTAs in India have upwards of 700 people each, so Srivatsa is right in making that comparison.

Posted On 11/3/2009 12:01:11 AM
Avid Said:


Question really is - How does iXiGo make money?

Posted On 11/3/2009 3:56:26 AM
Re: Paras Said:


@Avid: By charging airlines for the traffic it sends to their site. For the airline, its highly qualified traffic - becoz the user has already done his comparison on Ixigo.

Posted On 11/4/2009 10:16:20 AM
Mahesh Said:


What the heck does this line mean "Indian Institute of Technology engineers and Insead MBAs ". Why don't we Indians just judge any effort or idea on its own merits without going into the educational background of the person/s behind it ?. All that matters are good ideas and their effective implementation to achieve the best. Any deviation will only result in second rate effort. Nobody here in the US talks about whether somebody went to Harvard/Stanford or their scores. Only the result matters.

Posted On 11/6/2009 6:58:26 AM
Re: gitu Said:


Mahesh u r so wrong! I've been at santa clara and am now at Stanford and at both places we do talk a LOT abt where someone is from. I worked for mckinsey where too it mattered where you came from and ofcourse what you did eventually.

Posted On 11/6/2009 11:46:15 PM