Log has written
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2012

Going back to the farm is an indulgence that urban professionals who have made their millions can afford, but such a trend worries us when it involves the poor. And that is just what the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) seems to be doing. Here’s why.

Economic development necessarily involves the movement of people from low-productivity to high-productivity jobs. In most countries, this means that the millions trapped in dead-end farm work move into cities where they get jobs in modern manufacturing or services. That is what happened in Taiwan, South Korea, Thailand and many other countries in the region. Average incomes rise only when average productivity rises—it is as simple as that.

Illustration: Jayachandran / Mint

Illustration: Jayachandran / Mint

However, the rural jobs scheme creates perverse incentives for poor villagers to stay behind to earn a guaranteed basic income for 100 days a year rather than take the risk and venture out to seek more productive employment. Mint reported on Thursday from Bhilwara in Rajasthan that fewer people are moving out, thanks to the money offered by NREGS. A businessman participating in a roundtable organized by this newspaper in Bangalore on Monday complained that workers have moved back to their villages. Farmers point out that NREGS effectively puts a floor under rural wages, leading to labour shortages during harvest time.

The jobs scheme does offer some sort of income support to the poor, at least the money that gets through to them after the pilferage by local elites. The United Progressive Alliance believes that NREGS helped it win the 2009 elections. There is a growing chorus of voices from the voluntary sector that suggests that this scheme can do no harm. In short, NREGS has become a holy cow that cannot be questioned.

This newspaper continues to be critical of many aspects of the scheme. But our most significant worry is that it creates perverse incentives against seeking jobs in modern sectors. We believe that true inclusive growth can only be attained through job creation outside agriculture.

The ruling alliance loves to talk about inclusive growth even though it does little to help create new jobs through building infrastructure or reforming labour laws. Instead, the government is spending thousands of crores of rupees on a scheme that is likely to harm the shift of labour into the modern economy.

Is NREGS an obstacle to modernization? Tell us at views@livemint.com

Tags - Find More Articles On:
blog comments powered by Disqus
Commexes may see consolidation
Overcrowding is leading to stiff competition, undercutting of fees and raising the threat of taxation...
Jet flouted safety norms; will take action: DGCA
The regulator has summoned the airline’s chief of flight safety and the chief of operations on...
Dhanlaxmi Bank’s untold story: why the CEO had to go
The honeymoon did not last long as the trade union turned increasingly restless for fear of losing its...
Political economy of selective usage
It is important to recall the political economy of the usage of subsidies and sops
MAT may be withdrawn if govt’s test is made mandatory
MAT may have to be withdrawn from AICTE institutes, but AIMA will focus to customize it for private