Dear Aakar, Seems your story is totally biased. You have not been able to understand that as a politician or as a common man, whether LKA should mention about economy in his biography. There may be some missing linkages in the book but that cannot become a judgement for a person or his leadership. Talk about MMS. Though you have talked about his studies, you have not analysed his last five year on TOP POST (Really!!! He will need permission for this from Sonia ji, Rahul ji, Priyanka ji, I don't know names of Priyank's son, Rahul is not married so those names would be added later)of Indian policitcs what was his track record. A economist supported by another strong finance background person for Finance. Economy was booming, was that NDA's action on which congress was getting the fruits, Agri Economy, one can not understand how people can take credit where they do not contribute... Inflation was moving up. FM as well as PM was not able to judge whether it is effects of Global economy and oil or liquidity in Indian system. Liquidity was squeezed when global economy was coming down. Ban on sugar export has started immediately before the drop in international prices. FM was shouhting on all industry leaders to drop prices without looking at its cost structure. On Terrorism, when attack on Mumbai happend (Congress was in power both at State as well as at Centre)these people are termed as responsible. Do some more study and write Column without getting biased, as it is media only which can presents facts and one should not twist for giving favors. Thanks.