There are some points in this article that I can agree with, and some so inane and irrelevant that I do not find any reason to even think about them. Yes, there is room for improvement at IIMK, and as I student, I will be the first person to admit this. As one of the other comments have pointed out, there is not point in having IIM's in only the metros and tier-I cities, as they are too crowded already. What is shocking is the biased nature of the article, right from the word go. This raises doubts about the credibility of even what might have been truly the case. A magazine like MINT should not stoop to such low standards that we students have to look elsewhere for reliable and objective content.