Going through the article, I was surprised to see such heading "Lesson from IIMK:.......The newly built airport is very impressive, much better and spacious than the one in Delhi". Is the author trying to analyze the airport or IIMK? If this is the case for IIMK, then this article without any relevant data carries no meaning. This article itself shows the grudge of the author against the 3 IIMS(I,K,L)(may be because of that "uneasy relationship"). Can the author justify his points with relevant data when he comments about "data of corporate visitors, management development programmes, industry projects and case studies developed is much worse than some of the second-rung business schools"? I don't know what led the author to say that "Setting up a B-school in a remote place helps nobody except the contractors of that area" unless and until the author himself come and join this institute and have a taste of the system......rather remote place helps the students concentrate in their studies better in situation of pressure and stress. FYI, IIM C is also located far away from the city...just because of better studies and mainly for such kind of compact management programme.I think articles like this based on nothing but only biaseness should be prevented from publishing in reputed journal like Mint.Period.