Logwritten
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2009 6:26 AM IST

Bangalore: Science is all about empirical inquiry and objective results, but Indian scientists don’t appear to be divorced from their culture and ethos. The largest ever nationwide survey of Indian scientists shows that they are as comfortable with seeking the blessings of the resident God at Tirumala before a rocket launch as they are with embracing stem cell research.

The study, “Worldviews and Opinions of Scientists in India”, which was released at the United Nations in New York on Thursday, has been conducted by the Institute of the Study of Secularism in Society and Culture (ISSSC) of Trinity College in Connecticut, US, and assisted by the Centre for Inquiry India. It sampled 1,100 participants from 130 universities and research institutes in the country between July 2007 and January 2008.

Among other findings, the study shows that only 8% of Indian scientists express ethical reservations about genetic engineering and stem cell research, and 90% agree with the teaching of traditional Ayurvedic medicine in university courses. A large section, 56%, considers mixed economy as the preferred economic model, whereas 21% favour free market and 9% back socialism. Also, 6% think the village-based system is better while 8% are unsure.

“It’s a very good idea to do sociological studies,” of scientists, says Pushpa M. Bhargava, retired founder-director of the country’s premier research institute, the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology in Hyderabad, and a member of the National Security Advisory Council.

Scientists around the world should have uniform views as they work with the same material, but the fact is that socially, scientists are “badly divided”, says Bhargava, also former vice-chairman of the National Knowledge Commission, which he resigned from in May 2007. “In the West, all good scientists are, politically, to the left of the centre; and in their religion, (they are) total non-believers but in India, it’s the reverse; scientists who track evolution, actually believe in creation,” he says. Bhargava thinks sociological studies such as this will throw light on why this disparity exists.

The survey found that many scientists (44% of the sample) were willing to criticize and confront religious practices if they contradicted accepted scientific theories, but that a sizeable minority (23%) were opposed to this. And 33% agree with occasional confrontation.

“I’ve honestly felt that scientists in India are split personalities; they may oppose in public but pray to Ganesha (the Hindu God of beginnings) before starting the day,” he argues. He thinks this is also about the ethos of the country where a large section of the population believes in a ‘superior power’. “Don’t we start a symposium with a prayer?”

We do, and perhaps for the same reason, on a question of “efficacy of traditional therapies and technologies”, 49% of the scientists surveyed said they believed “prayer was efficacious”. As for invoking blessings before a space flight, it’d have come as a surprise to the pioneers of India’s space programs — Vikram Sarabhai, Satish Dhawan, K. Kasturirangan and others who’ve been known to be non-believers, says Bhargava.

Some of the findings have surprised the investigators too. The fact that Indian scientists do not differentiate much between doing research on cows (a holy animal for most Hindus) and pigs is most surprising to Barry Kosmin, the lead researcher from ISSSC. So is the fact that half the respondents believe in the efficacy of homeopathy and prayer. With 26% Indian scientists having definite belief in God, Kosmin says, they contrast sharply with their American counterparts as only 10% of scientists in the US hold such beliefs.

Is there a lack of scientific temper among Indian scientists in a country where scientists themselves bemoan the low levels of scientific literacy? Yes, says Bhargava, who believes the three Indian academies of science have never taken a stand on any social issue, and that they should engage more with the society. Incidentally, Bhargava gave up membership of all three academies on these grounds in 1994.

The Indian survey is the first in a series by ISSSC which aims to explore the opinions of science professionals in various non-Western countries. Studies in Japan, China, Russia, Israel and Turkey are underway.

READ MORE ARTICLES BY:
 
Krishna Said:


Interesting indeed! About the split personality, what is surprising to me (not pointed in this survey) is not the acceptance of an abstract god but that a good number of scientists accept specific forms of gods, rituals/prayers too. The survey does not bring this out, I could be wrong.

Posted On 6/6/2008 1:43:29 PM
Bhaskara Said:


This is understandable because outside the mainstream European countries there is no theory of knowledge and historical experience of reasoning. Research is generally hit and mis. There is always a conflict between reason and belief which makes many unhappy. It is not hard to learn the "scientific method" from the West instead of their superficial life styles. While European philosophers have been addressing questions, for fore than 500 years, like "the relationship between man and the state" Indian and other Oriental philosophers are still lost in questions like "the relationship between man and God"! There are as many as 99% who still believe in astrology in India and many are scientists!

Posted On 6/6/2008 9:16:01 PM
Re: Shiv Said:


Dear Baskara The commies of our country did not allow you to see the light. Now let me tell you. Most of the science that was done after dark ages were plagiarised from china,arabia and India when Europe was ruling or shipped by scholars to Middle east and then to Europe during mughal era. You can wiki or see other innumerable proofs, Books...unless you want to have low self esteem of your heritage.Again belief in God doesnt make you dull and being aethist doesnt make you bright.

Posted On 6/12/2008 4:03:44 PM
rakesh Said:


Hi Isnt a scientist allowed to have his set of emotional requirements? If he feels his work would be more productive with a few minutes of prayer, I feel he should be allowed to worship however "primitive" and "irrational" his belief or practise may be, this is strange that a scientific still has not be able to explain something as basic as gravity is commenting on a set of practises which they dont even attempt to understand. Is this an ego issue of the community that anything older than 100 years is backward. Why then is turmeric being patented???

Posted On 6/12/2008 3:21:53 PM
Shiv Said:


Hinduism as a religion always encouraged science,maths,medicine,freedom of choice in worship and even aethism! without calling anything heresy. So it coexisted with science unlike other religions and logically follows the scientists dont feel foolish to follow hinduism and practise science at same time. Author is encouraged to be little less Myopic in presenting his views.

Posted On 6/12/2008 3:33:25 PM
Shiv Said:


Hinduism had no conflict with science and encouraged math,science,medicine,surgery,philosophy and even aethism! and did not categorize any act as heresy or attempt to moral police scientific community in history unlike other practises.Hence hinduism hasnt stood in way of science by belief or idealogy and is more of a Personal option, scientists have no conflicts. The author needs to shun a myopic distorted viewpoint as there is always more than what meets the eye.Miles to go!

Posted On 6/12/2008 3:57:35 PM
nagesh Said:


it is such a shame that indian scientists believe in god, which is failed hypothesis by popular scientist Victor J. Stenger.When i came to know that one of ISRO scientist went to tirupathi after successful satellite launch, I lost good impression on indian scientists. 10% american scientists believe in god , but nearly 50% indian scientists believe in god. do indian scientists have brain to think rationally when it comes to god or religion?

Posted On 6/27/2008 1:14:04 AM