Disney agrees to pay $100 million to end no-poaching lawsuit
- Lok Sabha adjourned till noon amid uproar
- Gujarat elections: Celebrations break out in BJP camp in Gandhinagar
- Deals Buzz: Bain Capital takes $450 million bridge loan to fund Axis Bank deal
- Skymet raises Series C funding from Germany’s InsuResilience Investment Fund
- Honor Holly 4 Review: Close to Xiaomi Redmi 4, but not better
San Francisco: Walt Disney Co. agreed to pay $100 million to resolve claims it colluded with other animation studios to not hire one another’s workers in California, where allegations of no-poaching pacts have plagued technology companies for the better part of a decade.
Disney and three of its units are the last remaining defendants in a class-action lawsuit alleging the studios conspired to suppress wages through a “gentleman’s agreement” to not recruit each other’s workers.
Attorneys for Disney and employees submitted a court filing on Tuesday seeking approval of their settlement.
Comcast Corp.’s DreamWorks Animation SKG previously agreed to a $50 million settlement, while two Sony Pictures units and Blue Sky Studios reached deals totaling $19 million.
Apple Inc., Google, Intel Corp. and Adobe Systems Inc. paid $415 million in 2015 to resolve their part in a similar case that was brought against Silicon Valley technology companies that had been investigated for collusion by the US justice department.
Orly Lobel, a law professor at the University of San Diego, predicted Disney’s settlement will win approval because it satisfies requirements the agreement is fair, reasonable and adequate.
“Given that this was the last holdout, there are already proxies of what should be the lump sum and it seems within the range,” Lobel said.
A $100 million settlement for one large company is proportional to the $415 million agreed to by several technology giants in the previous case, and the much smaller earlier settlements, she said.
A Disney spokesperson didn’t immediately respond to a call after regular business hours seeking comment on the agreement. Bloomberg