2386

SC refuses to stay Bombay HC’s Deccan Chargers decision

SC bench adds its order won’t affect the arbitration proceedings between Deccan Chargers and BCCI
PTI Mail Me
Comment E-mail Print
First Published: Fri, Oct 19 2012. 12 05 PM IST
A bench headed by Chief Justice Altamas Kabir dismissed the plea of DCHL, promoter of Deccan Chargers, to extend a deadline for furnishing a bank guarantee of Rs100 crore to 25 October. Photo: HT
A bench headed by Chief Justice Altamas Kabir dismissed the plea of DCHL, promoter of Deccan Chargers, to extend a deadline for furnishing a bank guarantee of Rs100 crore to 25 October. Photo: HT
Updated: Sat, Oct 20 2012. 12 01 AM IST
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to stay the termination of the Deccan Chargers team by the Board for Control of Cricket in India (BCCI) from the Indian Premier League (IPL), paving the way for a fresh auction to held on 25 October.
The apex court declined to interfere with Thursday’s Bombay high court decision, which had set aside the status quo order passed by an arbitrator on cessation of its membership in the league. A bench headed by Chief Justice Altamas Kabir dismissed the plea of Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd (DCHL), promoter of Deccan Chargers, to extend a deadline for furnishing a bank guarantee of Rs.100 crore to 25 October.
It accepted BCCI’s submission that the termination of contract with Deccan Chargers came into effect on 12 October, the day the high court had held that the arbitrator had no jurisdiction to grant status quo and declined to grant extension of time for furnishing the bank guarantee.
“The position today stands that the agreement between Deccan Chargers and BCCI is terminated and the effect of extension of time to deposit the bank guarantee will amount to forcing the contract,” said the bench, also comprising justices S.S. Nijjar and J. Chelameswar. “It has been pointed out by the BCCI about the fact of termination of contract which is effective from October 12. In such circumstance we are not inclined to entertain the special leave petition.”
The bench added that its order won’t affect the arbitration proceedings between Deccan Chargers and BCCI. DCHL, which had rushed the appeal against the high court order, had argued through senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi that it should be given a chance to furnish the bank guarantee by 25 October.
Comment E-mail Print
First Published: Fri, Oct 19 2012. 12 05 PM IST
blog comments powered by Disqus
  • Wed, May 15 2013. 06 41 PM IST
  • Wed, May 08 2013. 05 55 PM IST
ALSO READ close

Sahara pulls Pune Warriors India from Indian Premier League

Subscribe |  Contact Us  |  mint Code  |  Privacy policy  |  Terms of Use  |  Advertising  |  Mint Apps  |  About HT Media
Contact Us
Copyright © 2012 HT Media All Rights Reserved