Iam a huge fan of differentiation, which is as sound as a management system can be. I have seen it transform companies from mediocre to outstanding.
Companies win when their managers make clear and meaningful distinctions between top-performing and under-performing businesses and people—when they cultivate the strong and cull the weak. Companies suffer when every business and person is treated equally and bets are sprinkled evenly.
When all is said and done, differentiation is just resource allocation. A company has only so much money and managerial time. Winning leaders invest where the payback is highest and cut their losses everywhere else.
If that sounds Darwinian, let me add that I am convinced that along with being the most efficient and most effective way to run your company, differentiation also happens to be the fairest and the kindest way. Ultimately, it makes everyone a winner.
Also See Jack and Suzy Welch Video
Why hate differentiation
Because managers must assess their employees, separate them into three categories in terms of performance—top 20%, middle 70% and bottom 10%—and act on those distinctions, differentiation receives a lot of criticism. Some of these criticisms have some truth in them, but more often than not, they don't! Here's what I mean:
Differentiation is unfair
It is unfair because it’s always corrupted by company politics—20-70-10 just separates the people who ingratiate themselves with their manager from those who don't.
It's true that at some companies differentiation is corrupted by cronyism and favouritism. Luckily, “differentiation abuse” can generally be prevented. Differentiation should be implemented only after a candid, clear-cut performance system, defined goals and timelines, and a programme of consistent appraisals has been put in place.
It is mean and bullying
Differentiation makes weak employees objects of ridicule.
When differentiation is working, people know where they stand. You know whether you have a strong shot at a big promotion or if it's time to start looking for other opportunities. When you know where you stand, you can control your own destiny, and what's more fair than that?
For those managers concerned about firing underperformers who are nice people, keep in mind that protecting underperformers is detrimental to both the company and the underperformers themselves. By not carrying their weight, the underperformers make the pie smaller for everyone, which can cause resentment. It's also unfair, which undermines the atmosphere of trust and candour. The worst thing, though, is that protecting people who don't perform hurts them in the long run since they remain blissfully unaware of the truth about their results.
It undermines teamwork
It also pits people against one another. Differentiation rewards those team members who deserve it. By the way, that annoys only the underperformers. To everyone else, it seems fair. And a fair environment promotes teamwork. Better yet, it motivates people to give their all, and that's what you want.
Discouraging to the 70%
This is because people in the top 20% and bottom 10% know where they are going. But, it is enormously discouraging to the middle 70%, who end up in an awful kind of limbo.
First, differentiation forces companies to manage themselves better. Leaders tend to scrutinize people more closely than they ordinarily would so as to provide more consistent, candid feedback, and it pushes organizations to tackle the problem of how to provide training that will really make a difference.
And while being in the middle 70% may be discouraging for some, it actually revs the engines of many others. For the people in the top 20, for instance, the very existence of a middle 70 gives them yet another reason to pull out all the stops every day. After all, they have to keep improving to keep their high standing!
For a lot of people in the middle 70, improvement is energizing too. Reaching for the top 20 gives them a tangible goal, which in turn makes them work harder, think more creatively and overall, fight the good fight every day. It makes work more of a challenge and a lot more fun.
Favours the extroverts
The world generally favours people who are energetic and extrovert, and not the shy. That’s something you learn young and by the time you get to work, if you are still shy and introvert, there are professions where those characteristics are advantageous. And with differentiation, you can be sure that your results will speak for themselves, loud and clear.
If you want the best people on your team, you need to start differentiating. I don’t know of any management system that does it better—with more transparency, fairness or speed. It isn't perfect, but differentiation, like candour, clarifies business and makes it run better in every way.
Adapted from Winning (HarperBusiness Publishers, 2005), by Jack Welch and Suzy Welch.
Write to Jack & Suzy
Jack and Suzy are eager to hear about your career dilemmas and challenges at work, and look forward to answering some of your questions in future columns. Jack and Suzy Welch are the authors of the international best-seller, Winning. Their latest book is Winning: The Answers: Confronting 74 of the Toughest Questions in Business Today. Mint readers can email them questions at firstname.lastname@example.org. Please include your name, occupation and city. Only select questions will be answered.