Govt should rein in ‘capital dumping’: Ola
Foreign capital should not be used only to offer disruptive pricing, say s Ola COO Pranay Jivrajka
Latest News »
- Govt, industry should team up to minimize disruption due to GST implementation
- GST rollout from 1 July, but confusion still reigns among auto, FMCG firms
- Why didn’t Madhya Pradesh farmers gain from farm growth?
- NIPFP may help compute social obligation costs borne by Indian Railways
- GST is the new normal, but issues still remain: Nykaa’s Sachin Parikh
Though heavily funded by foreign investors such as Japanese SoftBank Group, leading cab aggregator Ola has said the government should bring in regulations to stop “capital dumping”, which is distorting the market.
“There is an urgent need for adequate regulation to curb predatory pricing and capital dumping in the ecosystem in the interest of coexistence of all players in the ecosystem,” Ola’s chief operating officer Pranay Jivrajka said over phone from Bengaluru.
While he did not name the company’s deep-pocketed arch-rival Uber, he said foreign capital should not be used only to offer disruptive pricing.
The comments are interesting as Ola has secured foreign capital worth over $1.2 billion from investors such as SoftBank, DST Global, Accel Partners and Sequoia Capital, among other.
It is scouting for another round of funding from the Japanese company and others.
Ola’s previous fund-raising of $500 million last November was also from SoftBank.
Media reports said Ola, the third most valuable start-up in the country, is looking at raising around $600 million in this round.
Asked about this, Jivrajka said the company is adequately capitalized now; and that as a policy, it does not comment on market speculation. He evaded a direct answer when pointed out that his own company is almost fully funded by foreign capital, saying capital should not be used just to offer disruptive pricing.
“Capital should be used for sustainability,” he added.
On predatory pricing, he said Ola’s prices on an average are 20% higher than Uber’s and, in almost all cities where the American firm is not present, the Bengaluru-based start-up’s operations are profitable.
Broadly welcoming the recently released Maharashtra City Taxi Rules of 2016, Jivrajka said the policy is forward-looking, comprehensive and inclusive in nature.
“We made three recommendations to Maharashtra. The most important is the need for a review of the proposed high licence/permit fee of Rs2.61 lakh for vehicles of 1,400-cc and above as this is bound to fall heavy on drivers as they never factored in this while taking their loan and will add over 30% capital burden for them,” he said.
He said this high cost of permit is not there in any other state. Karnataka, Delhi, Kerala and Chandigrah have come out with regulations for cab aggregators but none of them have such high permit fees, he added. Jivrajka said this high entry cost will be a deterrent to entrepreneurs and would eventually make rides costlier for customers.
Ola also wants a review of the rule that makes it mandatory for an operator/aggregator to have 50% fleet with above 1,400-cc engines.
“Fleet composition should be best left to the choice of drivers which is done according to the demand from consumers,” Jivrajka said, adding Mumbai does not need so many premium taxis.
Ola is present in 102 cities and claims over 450,000 drivers on its platform with cabs, autorickshaws, taxis and bike taxis (in Gurgaon).
Uber, too, had sought a review of these norms while welcoming the rest of policy proposals.
According to Uber, the proposed stipulation that more that 50% of vehicles on ride-sharing platforms should be over 1,400cc would result in disappearance of economical and fuel efficient vehicles from the platform.
“It also takes away the freedom and flexibility of drivers to have the vehicle of their choice, forcing them to buy more expensive cars, which will, in turn. increase fares,” Uber had said, adding that capping pricing prevents market forces from determining lower fares when possible.