×
Home Companies Industry Politics Money Opinion LoungeMultimedia Science Education Sports TechnologyConsumerSpecialsMint on Sunday
×

DLF again found guilty of abusing dominance

DLF again found guilty of abusing dominance
PTI
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Tue, Aug 30 2011. 07 38 PM IST
Updated: Tue, Aug 30 2011. 07 38 PM IST
New Delhi: A fortnight after penalizing DLF with a hefty sum of Rs630 crore, competition watchdog CCI on Tuesday in another case directed the company to stop formulating and imposing unfair conditions in its agreements with home buyers but did not impose any fine in this case.
After examining a complaint filed by the Park Place Residents’ Association in Gurgaon, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) found DLF guilty of abusing its dominant market position and asked it to modify unfair conditions imposed on its buyers within three months.
Reacting to the CCI order, DLF said, “The company will be filing an appeal with the Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) shortly as the company continues to believe that it has a strong case.”
In its 65-page order, CCI said it has directed “DLF and its group companies... to cease and desist from formulating and imposing such unfair conditions in its agreement with buyers in Gurgaon, (and) to substantially modify unfair conditions imposed on its buyers.. within 3 months of the date of receipt of this order.”
Unlike last order dated 16 August, CCI did not impose any penalty on the realtor.
In an earlier case, DLF was asked to pay a penalty of Rs630.44 crore, which was 7% of its three years’ average annual turnover.
“The Commission had already imposed a penalty on DLF Ltd... The nature of contravention of provisions is identical in its object and effect in the instant cases and emerges from the position of strength of DLF in the same relevant market”.
“Therefore it will not be appropriate to separately impose penalty again,” said the order.
The Park Place Resident’s Welfare Association complained that DLF had diverted from the original stipulations of the agreement without keeping the buyers in loop.
One such diversion was that of increasing the number of floors from 19 to 29 floors.
It was also alleged that the company, being a dominant undertaking, had devised a standard agreement which was one-sided.
Besides, the CCI found that DLF had announced the project before getting necessary conditions and clearances and delayed the completion of the project.
The CCI, which became fully functional in May 2009, draws its power from the Competition Act 2002 to check anti-competitive practices and abuse of dominant market positions.
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Tue, Aug 30 2011. 07 38 PM IST
More Topics: DLF | CCI | Real estate | Fine | COMPAT |