Washington: It’s a new dawn for transport, lodging—and pretty much every service under the sun—and it’s all about “sharing”.
The so-called sharing economy gained traction across the globe in 2015 as Uber upended the taxi business, Airbnb disrupted the hotel sector and a host of online and mobile start-ups let people moonlight as chefs or handymen.
Many see great promise in the collaborative economy, starting with the people flocking to it as way to turn their car or apartment, spare time or hobby, into a source of revenue—with far great flexibility than a conventional job.
A PriceWaterhouse study estimates that the “sharing” or “peer-to-peer” economy will explode from roughly $15 billion in worldwide revenues at the end of 2014 to $325 billion by 2025.
But critics worry the rising sector is an unregulated Wild West with few safeguards for either workers or consumers, and the trend has raised hackles from incumbents fearing for their survival—cue the taxi driver protests against Uber seen around the world.
Posting on the Uber forum under the handle DaveM, one driver describes a summer gig on Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, as idyllic.
“I’m making good money. If I put in the hours I can get 18 rides a day,” he writes. “Beach all day drive at night=happiness.”
But user tales of woe collected on a website called AirbnbHell, tell another side of the story.
One lodging guest recounts: “When I got to the house and met the folks they seemed cool. When I went out for dinner, they stole all my stuff and locked me out. To make it worse, they sent me an email saying God bless, Jesus loves you.”
Facilitated by smartphones and geolocation technology, the sharing model offers consumers vastly expanded choices and often lower prices.
Spearheaded by giants like Uber, present in at least 67 countries, and Airbnb which operates in 190 countries including Cuba, peer-to-peer platforms have the potential “to radically upend both how we consume goods and how we work to afford them”, said the PwC report.
Notable platforms include Task Rabbit (running errands), Hourly Nerds (computer consultants), Thumbtack (home repairs), Bon Appetour (home-cooked meals) and Washio (laundry). Services such as Instacart, Postmates and Grubhub deliver meals or groceries.
“I see this as one stage in a progression representing how digital technologies are changing how we organize work, which has been going on for 30 years,” said New York University (NYU) professor Arun Sundararajan, who specializes in the subject.
In the US alone, some 18 million workers now earn a significant portion of their income outside of traditional employment, according to MBO Partners. And a study by financial software group Intuit found that 80% of large corporations plan to increase their use of a “flexible workforce” in coming years.
Sundararajan says his research suggests people in digital labour markets often earn more than in traditional jobs.
“The evidence I have seen is that wages tend to go up when the work is related to physical presence,” as is the case with transportation, delivery or home services, he said. With services that can be outsourced to distant locations, such as web design or translation, wages often fell.
The people who stand to benefit most, said the NYU professor, are those struggling to make ends meet, and who are at or below median income.
“These are people who can afford to take a vacation because they can rent their place on Airbnb, who can afford their car payments because they drive for a ridesharing service.”
Backers say the sharing platforms are largely self-regulating: users review providers for quality, providing incentives for good service while weeding out the bad ones.
But that view is not universal, with Edith Ramirez, chairwoman of the US Federal Trade Commission, arguing recently that “targeted regulatory measures may be needed to ensure that these new business models have appropriate consumer protections”.
While many willingly embrace the job flexibility, meanwhile, the lack of a social safety net has raised concerns as traditional employment increasingly gives way to short-term “gig” work.
Increasingly vocal critics worry that the protections of the traditional employer-worker relationship, hard-won over the course of decades, could be lost in the process.
“This trend shifts all economic risks onto workers. A downturn in demand, or sudden change in consumer needs, or a personal injury or sickness, can make it impossible to pay the bills,” says former US labour secretary Robert Reich on his blog.
“It eliminates labour protections such as the minimum wage, worker safety, family and medical leave, and overtime. And it ends employer-financed insurance—Social Security, workers’ compensation, unemployment benefits, and employer-provided health insurance.”
New ideas are springing up to address the problem of job security, with start-ups joining labour activists to endorse efforts for a “flexible safety net” for this new type of worker.
A research report by Cornell University’s Seth Harris and Princeton’s Alan Krueger endorses the notion of a new classification of “independent workers” with portable social benefits.
Proponents of the sharing economy argue however that the sector is moving so quickly that it would be a mistake to impose new regulations without careful consideration.
“It’s not clear that we have found the new models of labour that will dominate in the 21st century,” Sundararajan said.
“We have to be cautious about rushing into regulation.”