Free press not so free any more in Pakistan

Free press not so free any more in Pakistan
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Thu, May 17 2007. 09 04 PM IST
Updated: Thu, May 17 2007. 09 04 PM IST
Islamabad: Legal and political wrangling over the suspension of the chief justice of Pakistan by President Pervez Musharraf appears to be leading to new pressures on the media, news organizations and media watchdog groups say.
Media organizations and rights groups say the government is becoming increasingly intolerant of the independent media’s coverage of the judicial crisis that began in March, when Musharraf suspended chief justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry. Nationwide protests over his removal have paralyzed the country, with more than 40 people killed last weekend. Government officials deny clamping down on the media and say the press enjoys unprecedented freedom.
“There is a negative perception,” said Syed Anwar Mahmood, secretary of the ministry of information and broadcasting last month. He said the media practice self-censorship and the critical coverage of the President appearing in newspapers and on television would’ve been unimaginable under?former?governments.
But journalists here and international media watchdog groups say press freedom has been steadily declining in Pakistan over the past few years.
Reporters Sans Frontières, a France-based watchdog group, has reported a gradual erosion of media freedom in Pakistan over the past four years. According to an index of worldwide press freedom published in October, “despite fairly outspoken media outlets, the country has seen kidnappings of journalists and physical attacks by police or intelligence agents.” Of the 168 countries surveyed in the index, Pakistan’s ranking slipped to 157 in 2006 from 119 in 2002.
Journalists here are barred from reporting independently, without government escorts, from the tribal areas that straddle the Afghanistan border, where supporters of the Taliban hold sway. And journalists who live in those areas have been threatened and kidnapped for their work.
Media organizations say recent coverage criticizing the government’s actions in the judicial crisis has increased Islamabad’s attempts to influence the media. On 9 May, the Supreme Court barred some coverage of the charges against Chaudhry.
“Discussions, comments or write-ups that are likely to interfere with the legal process, ridicule, scandalize or malign the court or any of its judges, or that touch on the merits of the case are strictly prohibited,” the state-run media quoted the court as ruling in a directive it issued. Under Pakistani law, a contempt citation could lead to imprisonment.
A day after that ruling, the Committee to Protect Journalists, a New York-based media watchdog group, urged the Supreme Court to “immediately withdraw the alarming press directive” that it said had been “designed to stifle coverage of a controversial issue involving the court.”
In the past month, lawyers and opposition members who accused Musharraf of trying to subdue the judiciary have clashed with the police in protests across the country. Analysts have described the protests as the most serious crisis faced by Musharraf since he took power in 1999.
Independent television news programmes have covered the protests, but they have been careful not to air footage of people shouting or displaying slogans against the army. The state-run media, on the other hand, has criticized those who support the chief justice for “politicizing a legal issue.”
On 22 April, AAJ, a popular private television channel, was threatened with closure after the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority accused the channel of “inciting violence” through its coverage of the events surrounding the suspension of the chief justice.
The media authority ruled that AAJ had violated a code of conduct bars broadcasters from airing programmes that may incite violence, undermine law and order, show contempt for the courts or criticize the armed forces. On 25 April, a provincial court temporarily suspended the ruling. The matter is still under consideration by the court.
The censuring of AAJ followed a police raid on the Islamabad office of GEO, another popular television channel, in a bid to stop the station’s live coverage of a protest by lawyers. Musharraf apologized after the raid, saying in an interview with GEO, which was broadcast by the channel, that the action had been “a sabotage of whatever we stand for.”
Syed Talat Hussain, director (news & current affairs), AAJ, said, “The judicial crisis has landed them in a thick soup,” referring to the government. “The country’s image has been badly damaged. So, typically, they reacted to the symptoms of their troubles, which is what they see on screen and what they read in print.”
Dawn, the largest independent publisher of English-language newspapers and magazines in the country, said the government had put pressure on it for its critical reporting on the protests. Hameed Haroon, chief executive and publisher of the Dawn Group, wrote in a posting on the company’s website that it had lost two-thirds of its government advertising revenue since December 2006.
Government officials, however, remain adamant that media have greater freedom under Musharraf than in the past, pointing to more than 30 private channels as an indication of a liberal media policy.
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Thu, May 17 2007. 09 04 PM IST