×
Home Companies Industry Politics Money Opinion LoungeMultimedia Science Education Sports TechnologyConsumerSpecialsMint on Sunday
×

Tehri hydel project under scrutiny

Tehri hydel project under scrutiny
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Thu, Jul 15 2010. 11 11 PM IST

Photo: Ramesh Pathania/Mint
Photo: Ramesh Pathania/Mint
Updated: Thu, Jul 15 2010. 11 11 PM IST
New Delhi: A $600 million (Rs2,802 crore) World Bank loan for a 444MW hydropower project in Uttarakhand may be in trouble following allegations over the manner in which it received environmental clearance.
The project is being constructed by state-owned Tehri Hydroelectric Development Corp. Ltd, or THDC.
According to documents reviewed by Mint, the World Bank has asked the Indian government to address allegations about improperly held public hearings for the clearance of the Vishnugad-Pipalkoti dam in Chamoli district. The bank’s action came after it was sent a letter detailing these allegations by Vimalbhai, convenor of the Matu People’s Organization, a Delhi-based activist organization.
Photo: Ramesh Pathania/Mint
These concerns have been raised at a time when there is already considerable scrutiny of hydro projects in the country due to environmental concerns. The ministry of environment and forests (MoEF) had recently spiked plans for hydro power projects on river Bhagirathi, also located in Uttarakhand and a major tributary of the Ganga.
The finance ministry sought the power ministry’s views on the bank’s concerns in a communication on 29 June addressed to Gireesh Pradhan, additional secretary.
While MoEF officials declined to comment, Pradhan did not return phone calls or respond to messages left at his office and on his cellphone.
The project, earlier scheduled to have been commissioned by 2013, is located on the Alaknanda, a Ganga tributary, and is expected to have four units of 111MW each.
The activist body has alleged in its letter that public hearings for the clearance of the project were not in accordance with stipulations, and that the environmental clearance protocol was not followed.
According to the environmental impact assessment (EIA) notification of 1994, amended in 2006, project proponents first have to prepare a report. Copies of this are then to be distributed to the local administration and affected people. An EIA assesses the impact of a project on the environment.
Public hearings are scheduled thereafter. The public hearing of grievances and discussions are noted and sent to MoEF for a final decision. The activist body says there were several gaps in the process actually followed.
“At the first public hearing, no documents were disclosed,” said Vimalbhai, who uses only one name. “Another hearing was held after protests but the same thing (happened).”
A World Bank spokesperson in India indicated in an email that all procedures had been followed: “The wide dissemination was aimed at soliciting feedback on the specific environmental impacts identified in the EIA and on the mitigation measures being proposed. In keeping with World Bank project preparation requirements, THDC invited the public at large, through newspaper inserts and press publications and via its website, to comment on the draft consolidated EIA/EMP, and to participate in a public stakeholders’ meeting, which took place in Pipalkoti on 13 September.”
R.S.T. Sai, chairman and managing director of THDC, said “nothing wrong has been done”. “This is a project loan. We’re yet to enter into any negotiation. The exact details of the loans are yet to be finalized. We don’t know why they’re agitating and why it is coming at this moment. As far as we know, all procedures have been completed. If somebody makes an allegation, it’s for them to prove it. Various procedural steps and criteria laid down have been adhered to. We’ve to see what this fuss is all about”.
The World Bank’s head office, however, responded to Vimalbhai’s letter by asking the finance ministry to “send...comments on submissions made in the email (from Vimalbhai) at the earliest.” It also said the “allegations are very serious” and that “the loan will be scheduled for board approval after issues on the project...are resolved.”
The spokesperson for the World Bank in India declined to comment on this communication and, responding to a question on whether the protest would affect the project’s chances of receiving the loan, said: “The bank proceeds to support a project only after it has satisfied itself that all national and bank policy requirements have been met; adequate consultation and preparation has been done; and effective measures have been put into place to mitigate and manage project risks and any adverse impacts.”
In 1994, the World Bank was forced to withdraw from its plan to fund the Sardar Sarovar project across the Narmada in the face of social and environmental concerns. The 192MW Allain Duhangan hydro project in Himachal Pradesh faced similar protests, but that didn’t hinder approvals for funding by the International Finance Corporation, a World Bank affiliate.
India has a hydropower generation capacity of 36,085MW and plans to add 15,627MW by 2012. Most hydro projects involve some amount of displacement of the local population.
padmaparna.g@livemint.com
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Thu, Jul 15 2010. 11 11 PM IST