Pfizer in talks to buy Wyeth for $60 billion

Pfizer in talks to buy Wyeth for $60 billion
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Mon, Feb 09 2009. 09 46 AM IST

Updated: Mon, Feb 09 2009. 09 46 AM IST
Pfizer Inc. is in talks to acquire rival drug maker Wyeth in a deal that could be valued at nearly $60 billion (Rs3 trillion), said people familiar with the matter.
A combination of these two US pharma giants would redraw the boundaries of the global drug industry, which has suffered from flagging product development and high fixed costs. It would also represent a high-stakes gambit for Pfizer, which has been stung in the past by expensive acquisitions.
The two sides have been in discussions for months and a deal isn’t imminent, the people said. Given recent market volatility and overall economic uncertainty, the talks are especially fragile and could collapse, the people warned.
Also See Possible Partners (PDF)
Pfizer spokesman Raymond F. Kerins Jr. said the firm doesn’t comment on “market rumours and speculation”. A Wyeth spokesman said, “We don’t comment on marketplace rumour.” Joining New York-based Pfizer and New Jersey-based Wyeth would create a behemoth with combined revenue of about $75 billion and a line of blockbuster drugs, including Pfizer’s cholesterol drug Lipitor and Wyeth’s paediatric vaccine Prevnar.
Pfizer, the world’s largest drug maker by revenue, would likely use a combination of cash and stock for the acquisition. Details on price haven’t been worked out, but Wyeth has a market cap of about $52 billion and premiums in the sector have averaged around 20%. That would put the value of the deal at above $60 billion.
If completed, a deal could create billions in cost savings through the combination of back-office operations, research and development (R&D), sales and manufacturing. Like other major pharma firms, Pfizer and Wyeth face the looming expiration of patents on their most lucrative products as well as intense competition from makers of generic drugs. In addition, a tougher regulatory environment in the US and overseas has made it more difficult to win approval for new treatments, forcing firms to narrow their research focus.
Those realities have prompted calls for industry consolidation from the investment community. For years, companies have withstood pressure to merge, hoping that new discoveries would allow them to maintain independence. But with drugs generating an estimated $30 billion in sales losing patent protection over the next several years, many analysts have been saying industry consolidation is inevitable.
Unlike other sectors of the economy, the pharma industry has historically been buffered from downturns because patients typically don’t stop seeking treatment for major ailments. While there are growing signs that this recession has triggered a decline in prescription-drug consumption among cash-strapped consumers, major companies nonetheless have streams of cash they can use for acquisitions.
Pfizer alone had nearly $27 billion in cash and equivalents on its balance sheet at the end of 2008, Goldman Sachs estimated in a recent note to investors. Analysts believe that most of that money is outside the US and Pfizer would suffer a tax hit if the company repatriated the funds. Many in the industry have been waiting to see what Pfizer does before pursuing deals of their own.
Pfizer posted a revenue of $48.4 billion and a profit of $8.1 billion in 2007, the most recent year for which data is available. Wyeth’s revenue totalled $22.4 billion and its profit $4.6 billion in 2007.
The stocks of both firms have held up fairly well over the past year against the rest of the market. Pfizer’s shares have fallen about 23% while Wyeth’s stock is down 7.5%. The S&P 500 is off 37% over the same period.
Combining drug companies doesn’t solve the industry’s short-term need for new drugs, but it would allow the industry to slash R&D spending, which accounts for nearly 20% of sales at many firms. With more scale, drug firms would also be better positioned to acquire biotech firms, which many believe will be a source of future treatments.
Many pharma companies have already begun to buy or strike drug-development deals with smaller biotech firms. While promising in the long term, such deals tend to bring too little revenues and profits in the short term to make up for the loss of blockbuster drugs.
Since Jeffrey B. Kindler took Pfizer’s helm in 2006, there have been rumours he would seek a major acquisition. Pfizer has been battling generic competition for some of its top drugs, while its best-selling drug, Lipitor, which accounts for one-fourth of its revenue, loses patent protection in 2011. It has had trouble bringing new products to market.
Kindler has been cutting costs, firing nearly 15,000 employees since January 2007. A person familiar with the matter said Pfizer is planning to cut as many as 2,400 sales jobs in the first quarter of 2009. The chief executive has also been revamping drug research efforts, shuttering laboratories and selling manufacturing plants. Investors and analysts have grown increasingly frustrated that these steps aren’t enough to return Pfizer to the kind of profitability that made it a stock market star in the 1990s and early 2000s. Since Kindler took over, the Pfizer stock is down 34%, against a drop of 20% for the Dow Jones Wilshire Pharmaceuticals Index.
Critics have lambasted Pfizer’s 2006 sale of its consumer business, which included the Listerine, Visine and Lubriderm brands, as well as non-prescription drugs Sudafed and Nicorette. That unit is now helping its buyer, Johnson and Johnson, weather problems in its own prescription drugs business. Of big drug makers, Pfizer has been built through big acquisitions. It gained full control of Lipitor after a $116 billion takeover of Warner-Lambert Co. in 2000. But Pfizer’s deal-making history also suggests the pitfalls of what analysts say is a reliance on big takeovers over strong in-house research and smart licensing.
Pfizer bought Pharmacia in 2003 largely for painkiller Celebrex, but sales plunged after a rival drug, Vioxx, was withdrawn in 2004 over heart risks. Wyeth has had struggles of its own in the past year or two, with sales of its new antidepressant Pristiq taking off slowly and a plunge in sales of heartburn drug Protonix after generic competition came sooner than expected. Midstage trial data of an Alzheimer’s drug the firm is developing with Elan Corp. have also disappointed some investors.
Nonetheless, analysts have named Wyeth as a likely target because the firm has products and businesses that complement Pfizer’s line-up. It’s not clear what role Wyeth CEO Bernard Poussot would play in the combined firm. Wyeth has already established a foothold in biotechnology. It would also bring with it an animal health business and a consumer health unit whose brands include Advil, Robitussin and ChapStick. Those businesses would help offset the cyclicality and risks of the drug business.
wsj@livemint.com
Dana Cimilluca and Sarah Rubenstein contributed to this story.
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Mon, Feb 09 2009. 09 46 AM IST
More Topics: Wyeth | Pfizer | KPMG | Lipitor | Raymond F. Kerins Jr |