Insolvency cases: RBI’s Mundra says firms free to move higher courts
Mumbai: With some large stressed firms challenging the Reserve bank of India’s (RBI) directives to banks to initiate proceedings against them under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in high courts, RBI deputy governor SS Mundra on Thursday said nobody can be prevented from approaching the judiciary.
Last week, the Gujarat High Court had dismissed Essar Steel’s plea against RBI to start insolvency proceedings against it. The court refused to grant any relief to the steel major on proceedings initiated against it by the State Bank of India and Standard Chartered Bank at National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) under the IBC, indicating that all issues raised by the company should be considered by the NCLT.
“Freedom of speech is a fundamental right and approaching the higher judiciary is open to everyone,” Mundra told reporters on the sidelines of a Canara Bank function. “If an individual company chooses to use that route, I don’t think that can be prevented, but I am sure that in any judicial system past pronouncements create a kind of future direction and that direction has now become evidently clear,” he said.
Essar Steel had moved the high court seeking the court’s direction to quash and set aside RBI’s direction to the banks to initiate insolvency proceedings against the company through a release dated 13 June. The RBI had last month identified 12 accounts (companies) for insolvency proceedings with each of them having over Rs5,000 crore of outstanding loans, accounting for 25% of the total non-performing assets (NPAs) of banks.
The steel company’s debt has increased to over Rs42,000 crore. Essar’s contention was that this directive was unfair as it was in an advanced stage of restructuring its loans. The Gujarat High Court had also rapped the RBI for its statement in which it had said that the NCLT will take up on a priority basis the insolvency proceedings against companies having high debt.
“The RBI has to be careful while issuing press releases, it must be in consonance with the Constitutional mandate, based on sound principles of law, but in any case should not be in the form of advice, guidelines or directions to judicial or quasi-judicial authorities in any manner what so ever,” the court had said in its order.
Mundra said it was an unintended interpretation (on the part of RBI) and that the Reserve Bank has done the required modification. “I don’t think RBI had ever intended to direct the judiciary as to what should be their priority,” he said. He also said that RBI is looking at the provisioning norms for the cases that have been or will be referred to IBC for resolution.
“That’s something where the mind is being applied now and as you see in this entire process, RBI’s been doing timely communication, so wait for that,” Mundra said. The RBI has asked banks to make a provision of up to 50% for the accounts for which insolvency proceedings have been initiated and make 100% for those face liquidation.