Active Stocks
Thu Apr 18 2024 13:55:29
  1. Tata Steel share price
  2. 162.05 1.25%
  1. Power Grid Corporation Of India share price
  2. 279.80 1.99%
  1. Infosys share price
  2. 1,427.10 0.87%
  1. NTPC share price
  2. 355.45 -1.06%
  1. Wipro share price
  2. 446.90 -0.38%
Business News/ Market / Stock-market-news/  Sebi may give FPIs bourse membership
BackBack

Sebi may give FPIs bourse membership

Move may be a blow to local brokerages; firms that want to grant special rights to PE investors may also be asked to seek minority shareholder approval

The Sebi board will consider these proposals in its 23 September meeting. Photo: Aniruddha Chowdhury/MintPremium
The Sebi board will consider these proposals in its 23 September meeting. Photo: Aniruddha Chowdhury/Mint

Mumbai: The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) is considering allowing foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) who trade in the Indian markets through brokers to become members of stock exchanges in what could potentially be a big blow to local brokerages. The capital markets regulator is also considering asking companies to seek minority shareholder approval to grant special rights to private equity (PE) investors, a move that is unlikely to be popular with the latter.

The Sebi board will consider these proposals in its 23 September meeting, two people with direct knowledge of the matter said on condition of anonymity.

A Sebi spokesperson did not respond to an email seeking comment sent Friday.

For starters, Sebi is considering allowing so-called category 1 and 2 FPIs to become members of exchanges for debt market trading. Gradually, they will be also be able to execute equity trades, said one of the two people cited above.

Category 1 FPIs include central banks and sovereign wealth funds. Category 2 includes mutual funds and banks.

The move will likely be cheered by FPIs, but only if it doesn’t mean more compliance.

“Some sort of limited broking licence will help in speedy execution of trades and address confidentiality concerns," said Tejesh Chitlangi, partner at law firm IC Legal.

Currently, FPIs trade through brokers, who derive a significant portion of their broking revenues from institutional investors. High competition and the stress of reducing broking fees has already made many of them diversify into ancillary activities such as investment banking and asset management.

“Brokerages will face pressure if the move is allowed. There is no precedence for the move the world over," said the head of a domestic brokerage on condition of anonymity.

To be sure, FPIs can also access the market directly through a mechanism called direct market access, but this remains a non-starter on account of onerous documentation and compliance requirements.

Indeed, registered FPIs say Sebi’s proposal makes sense only if compliance requirements are diluted further, as reduced costs alone may not be enough incentive for them to want to trade directly on exchanges.

“There could be other ramifications such as increased level of compliances. FPI interest is in managing money, not saving on trading cost," said U.R. Bhat, managing director at Dalton Capital Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Rights to PE firms

The second important proposal before the Sebi board is ensuring that protective rights and vetos given to PE firms are approved by minority shareholders.

Sebi has noted cases where PE investors have been granted more rights than their investments warrant, said the first person. In some cases, PE firms have a dominant say in the working of a company with just a minority stake and could restrict promoter/management discretion to a large extent—for instance, in raising fresh capital.

“If the rights awarded to strategic investors are cleared by shareholders then Sebi would have comfort that PE firms are not ‘controlling’ the management," said the first person.

Experts are critical of the move and say PE rights are aligned with those of minority shareholders. PE firms are also savvy investors and can be reasonably assumed to take decisions in the best interest of the company, they add.

It “may result in an own goal", said Sandeep Parekh, founder of law firm Finsec Law Advisors and a former Sebi executive director. “By making PE rights more difficult to enforce, Sebi may take away one of the few counter-balances against misuse of power of the controlling shareholder."

The regulator, in a discussion paper earlier this year, tried to address this issue by suggesting a list of rights that can be construed as control. For instance, it proposed that veto or affirmative rights in matters that are not part of the ordinary course of business or involve governance issues could be considered protective in nature and may not amount to control.

Unlock a world of Benefits! From insightful newsletters to real-time stock tracking, breaking news and a personalized newsfeed – it's all here, just a click away! Login Now!

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Jayshree P Upadhyay
Jayshree heads a team of reporters focussing on legal, regulatory, investigative stories. She has worked for over a decade, reporting on financial scams, legal stories and the intersection of corporate and regulatory issues. She is based in Mumbai and has previously worked with Business Standard, Mint, The Morning Context and Bloomberg TV India.
Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
More Less
Published: 12 Sep 2016, 12:49 AM IST
Next Story footLogo
Recommended For You
Switch to the Mint app for fast and personalized news - Get App