×
Home Companies Industry Politics Money Opinion LoungeMultimedia Science Education Sports TechnologyConsumerSpecialsMint on Sunday
×

Fed targeting zero isn’t the same as doing zip

Fed targeting zero isn’t the same as doing zip
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Wed, Dec 17 2008. 10 43 PM IST

Updated: Wed, Dec 17 2008. 10 43 PM IST
Back in November 2002, when Ben Bernanke was a Federal Reserve governor and the US economy was facing a faux deflation crisis, he gave a speech entitled, “Deflation: making sure it doesn’t happen here”.
He probably had no idea that six years later, now in the role of Fed chairman, he’d be fighting the deflation demon for real, with everything he’s got.
In a bold move on Tuesday, the Fed lowered the target for its overnight benchmark rate from 1% to a range of zero to 0.25%. The effective funds rate has been below the target for two months, in part because Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can’t earn interest on the reserves they hold in excess of what’s required by the Fed.
For all those who like to compare slight word variations in the current and previous statements in the hope of divining future Fed policy, Tuesday’s announcement departed from the usual boilerplate.
Specifically the Fed pledged to employ all available tools to rekindle economic growth and ward off deflation; to sustain its already bloated balance sheet at a high level; to purchase large quantities of agency debt and mortgage-backed securities to support the housing and mortgage markets; and to maintain exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for some time.
They are throwing the book at it, says Jim Glassman, senior economist at JPMorgan Chase and Co. There is no end to the options the Fed can use.
Promise made
Banks can now borrow at an interest rate of virtually zero, secure in the knowledge that the Fed isn’t going to raise the funds rate anytime soon. Policy makers expect economic conditions to warrant exceptionally low levels for some time.
Katy bar the door when things change. The Fed’s balance sheet has ballooned 155% in the past year, most of it in the last three months. When confidence and the willingness to take risk return, the Fed will have to demonstrate the same agility it has shown during the crisis and drain the $590 billion (Rs27.9 trillion) of excess reserves banks now hold (prior to the credit crisis, banks held an average of $1-2 billion of excess reserves). It’s these reserves that have the potential to multiply into money.
A promise made by the Fed to hold overnight rates at close to zero is a promise kept only if inflation expectations stay muted.
Before the Fed’s balance sheet shrinks, however, it’s going to get a lot bigger.
Buy it all
There’s a saying in regard to legal contracts: If you write at all, write it all, says Paul Kasriel, director of economic research at the Northern Trust Co. Well, the Fed has finally decided if it is going to buy at all, it will buy it all.
The Fed previously announced its intention to purchase large quantities of agency debt—bonds issued by Fannie and Freddie, for example—as well as mortgage-backed securities, and has bought $8 billion of agencies so far this month. And Bernanke already introduced the possibility of buying longer-term treasurys, an idea reiterated in Tuesday’s statement.
It’s hard to see what the benefit of lower long-term treasury yields would be. Yields on the 5-, 10- and 30-year treasurys are already at record lows of 1.29%, 2.27% and 2.75%, respectively.
The Fed gets hung up on treasurys, Kasriel says. It’s not the term structure of the risk-free curve that’s high. It’s the spread between private lending rates and treasury rates that’s high.
If private lending rates are what need to come down, the Fed can have a much bigger impact if it buys direct.
Besides, lower long-term treasury yields could even be counterproductive. A steeper risk-free curve is better for banks, providing an inducement and a means to bolster profits.
With the Fed effectively guaranteeing a fixed, low funding rate for the foreseeable future, to borrow a phrase from Alan Greenspan, banks can borrow from the Fed and buy intermediate and long-term treasurys. The profit goes to their bottom line. The act of lending—the US government has a huge demand for credit even if no one else does—increases the money supply. Growth in the money supply is an antidote to deflation.
The steep yield curve rescued the banks following the savings and loan crisis in the early 1990s. It will provide solace and succor this time, too—eventually.
It is to hasten that eventuality that the Fed is pulling out all the stops.
Respond to this column at feedback@livemint.com
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Wed, Dec 17 2008. 10 43 PM IST