Rocket Internet should benefit from Swedish transparency
- Improve pricing of risk-based loans, RBI tells banks
- Delhi HC asks IndiGo, GoAir, SpiceJet and DIAL to resolve terminal dispute amicably
- Coolpad raises $300 million from Power Sun Ventures
- The hockey tournament we won’t have in January
- Vodafone tax dispute: Govt calls invocation of second arbitration ‘flagrant’ abuse of law
Paris: Rocket Internet SE’s flight path is getting a little clearer, and investors have a Swedish investment fund to thank.
On Wednesday, the German start-up factory and Kinnevik AB jointly published results for Global Fashion Group, an online retailer they both own. The earnings were mixed: while the loss narrowed, revenue growth slowed in the third quarter.
Rocket shares fell almost 5%. But that shouldn’t discourage the company from releasing more financial data on its other holdings. The detailed and regular approach Kinnevik has long advocated should be welcomed by Rocket shareholders who have long struggled to value the incubator’s holdings in dozens of start-ups.
The disclosure matters. Global Fashion is one of Rocket’s biggest investments after its cluster of food delivery start-ups. It’s also been the poster child for investor concerns that Rocket’s valuations are too stratospheric.
Rocket only re-values companies when they raise money from outside sources. That has some odd consequences: for a period earlier this year, Rocket’s valuation of Global Fashion was three times that of Kinnevik’s since the latter updates its valuations every quarter. After Global Fashion completed a fund-raising round that saw the retailer’s value decline by two thirds, Rocket finally wrote it down in September. Kinnevik had taken the hit earlier.
That painful markdown at least prompted the companies to start publishing more detailed financial statements for Global Fashion.
Wednesday’s release of a further quarter’s financials shows the problems at the business were no one-off. They stem from the challenges of developing online commerce in emerging markets where supply chains and delivery logistics often need to be built from scratch.
Ironically, Kinnevik now values Global Fashion at 1.8 billion euros—more than Rockets’s estimate of 1.03 billion euros. So who is right? There are signs of improvement: the loss before interest, taxes and depreciation narrowed to 32.3 million euros from 54 million euros in the year-earlier period. Cash reserves jumped fourfold to 284 million euros, helped by the funding round and the sale of a money-losing division in India.
But Rocket’s (unusual) pessimism may be justified. The online retailer is still exposed to the depressed markets of Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Brazil. An Initial Public Offering (IPO) will have to wait for results to improve. A trade sale of the whole looks unlikely, although there could be buyers for its operations in some of those markets.
These types of exits are probably the only thing that will really change investors’ minds on Rocket. The company has made a start: in April, it sold Lazada, an Amazon clone in Southeast Asia, to Alibaba in April for $1 billion—more than what Kinnevik had valued it at.
There are signs that some doubters are coming around: the short interest on Rocket has declined to 24% from as much as 40% earlier this year. But the stock is still down 58% since the IPO. Real improvement would require Rocket to deliver on the promise of an IPO of one of its companies before the middle of next year, or more asset sales. In the meantime, it could do worse than adopting more of Kinnevik’s transparency. Bloomberg